McMenamin v. Evesham Mun. Utilities Authority, B--4

Decision Date23 September 1969
Docket Number5 and 6,B--4
Citation107 N.J.Super. 42,256 A.2d 801
PartiesFrancis B. McMENAMIN and Rose M. McMenamin, his wife, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. EVESHAM MUNICIPAL UTILITIES AUTHORITY, a public body corporate and politic under N.J.S.A. 14, in the Township of Evesham, Burlington County, New Jersey, Defendant-Appellant.
CourtNew Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division

Reported at 104 N.J.Super. 161, 249 A.2d 21 (Ch.Div.1969).

William B. Colsey, III, Mount Holly, for appellant (Powell & Davis, Mount Holly, attorneys).

Joseph S. Georgiana, Camden, for respondents (Capehart & Scatchard, Camden, attorneys).

Before Judges SULLIVAN, CARTON and HALPERN.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment herein is affirmed for the reasons stated by Judge Wick in the Chancery Division, 104 N.J.Super. 161, 249 A.2d 21 (1969).

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Oliver v. Hyle
    • United States
    • Oregon Court of Appeals
    • 27 Agosto 1973
    ...124 N.J.Eq. 305, 1 A.2d 854 (1938); McMenamin v. Evesham Municipal Util. Authority, 104 N.J.Super. 161, 249 A.2d 21, affirmed 107 N.J.Super. 42 256 A.2d 801 (1969); United States v. Springwood Village, Inc., 168 F.Supp. 885 (DCNY 1958); Miller v. Wilkes-Barre Gas Co., 206 Pa. 254, 55 A. 974......
  • Browning-Ferris Industries of North Jersey, Inc. v. City of Passaic
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • 26 Julio 1989
    ... ... , Passaic, for amicus curiae Municipal Utilities Authority of the City of Passaic ... Randolph Township Mun. Utils. Auth., 163 N.J.Super. 501, 514, 395 A.2d ... See, e.g., McMenamin v. Evesham Mun. Utils. Auth., 104 N.J.Super ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT