McMenamin v. Evesham Mun. Utilities Authority, B--4
Decision Date | 23 September 1969 |
Docket Number | 5 and 6,B--4 |
Citation | 107 N.J.Super. 42,256 A.2d 801 |
Parties | Francis B. McMENAMIN and Rose M. McMenamin, his wife, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. EVESHAM MUNICIPAL UTILITIES AUTHORITY, a public body corporate and politic under N.J.S.A. 14, in the Township of Evesham, Burlington County, New Jersey, Defendant-Appellant. |
Court | New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division |
Reported at 104 N.J.Super. 161, 249 A.2d 21 (Ch.Div.1969).
William B. Colsey, III, Mount Holly, for appellant (Powell & Davis, Mount Holly, attorneys).
Joseph S. Georgiana, Camden, for respondents (Capehart & Scatchard, Camden, attorneys).
Before Judges SULLIVAN, CARTON and HALPERN.
The judgment herein is affirmed for the reasons stated by Judge Wick in the Chancery Division, 104 N.J.Super. 161, 249 A.2d 21 (1969).
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Oliver v. Hyle
...124 N.J.Eq. 305, 1 A.2d 854 (1938); McMenamin v. Evesham Municipal Util. Authority, 104 N.J.Super. 161, 249 A.2d 21, affirmed 107 N.J.Super. 42 256 A.2d 801 (1969); United States v. Springwood Village, Inc., 168 F.Supp. 885 (DCNY 1958); Miller v. Wilkes-Barre Gas Co., 206 Pa. 254, 55 A. 974......
-
Browning-Ferris Industries of North Jersey, Inc. v. City of Passaic
... ... , Passaic, for amicus curiae Municipal Utilities Authority of the City of Passaic ... Randolph Township Mun. Utils. Auth., 163 N.J.Super. 501, 514, 395 A.2d ... See, e.g., McMenamin v. Evesham Mun. Utils. Auth., 104 N.J.Super ... ...