McMichael v. U.S., s. 87-1634
| Decision Date | 25 August 1988 |
| Docket Number | Nos. 87-1634,s. 87-1634 |
| Citation | 856 F.2d 1024 |
| Parties | Carl McMICHAEL, et al., Appellee, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellant. to 87-1640, 87-1707. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit |
Ralph Johnson, Washington, D.C., for U.S.
Bettina Brownstein, Little Rock, Ark., for Highland Resources.
Bernard Whetstone, Little Rock, Ark., for Mitchell, Moody, Kelly and Stancile.
James Bruce McMath, Little Rock, Ark., for McMichael, Bartlett, Madison and Harrison.
Before JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge, BRIGHT, Senior Circuit Judge, and MAGILL, Circuit Judge.
The motion of the United States to vacate the judgment in favor of plaintiff-appellee Billy Harrison is before the court. The motion is based on the failure of the notice of appeal to include Harrison's name and the issuance of the recent opinion of the Supreme Court in Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Company, et al., --- U.S. ----, 108 S.Ct. 2405, 101 L.Ed.2d 285 (1988). This issue was presented to the court before. See Harrison v. United States, 715 F.2d 1311 (8th Cir.1983). Pursuant to the opinion issued at that time, an order was entered that the notice of appeal be amended to include Billy Harrison. Materials have been filed with the court revealing that the parties have stipulated the amount of damages of some of the appellees, expressly stating that the government's right to appeal a liability issue was not waived. Ordinarily a procedural change in the law, such as announced in Torres, is not given retroactive application. Particularly under the circumstances presented in this case, we decline to do so. The motion to vacate the judgment as to plaintiff-appellee Billy Harrison is denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Minority Employees of the Tennessee Dept. of Employment Sec., Inc. v. State of Tenn., Dept. of Employment Sec.
... ... Van Hoose v. Eidson, 450 F.2d 746 (6th Cir.1971) ... It is evident to us that Torres spoke to factual circumstances concerning the adequacy of a notice of appeal which were ... We, therefore, cannot agree with McMichael v. United States, 856 F.2d 1024, 1025 (8th Cir.1988), that Torres announced a "procedural change in ... ...
-
Rosario-Torres v. Hernandez-Colon
... ... denied, 485 U.S. 960, 108 S.Ct. 1222, 99 L.Ed.2d 423 (1988). The appeals presently before us are borne aloft on the same winds of political change ... Page 316 ... There ... Spurgeon, 861 F.2d 181, 183 & n. 3 (8th Cir.1988) (distinguishing McMichael v. United States, 856 F.2d 1024 (8th Cir.1988), which declined to apply Oakland Scavenger ... ...
-
In re Graham
... ... is not given retroactive application." McMichael v. United States, 856 F.2d 1024, 1025 (8th Cir.1988). See also G.H. McShane Co. v. McFadden, ... ...
-
Santos-Martinez v. Soto-Santiago
... ... Appellants also tell us that after the notice of appeal was filed, Felicita Charriez Rosa decided to withdraw from the ... McMichael v. United States, 856 F.2d 1024, 1025 (8th Cir.1988) (declining to apply Torres retroactively) ... ...