McNab v. Kok, 97-35481

Decision Date25 March 1999
Docket NumberNo. 97-35481,97-35481
Citation170 F.3d 1246
Parties99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2157, 1999 Daily Journal D.A.R. 2820 Loren Edward McNAB, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Cynthia KOK; Hardy Myers, Attorney General of the State of Oregon, Respondents-Appellees.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit

Wendy Rae Willis, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Portland, Oregon, for the petitioner-appellant.

David B. Thompson, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, Oregon, for the respondents-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon; Robert E. Jones, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-96-06010-REJ.

Before: SNEED, KOZINSKI, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Loren Edward McNab, a former Oregon prisoner, appeals the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253. We review de novo a district court's dismissal of a habeas corpus petition, see Morales v. Calderon, 85 F.3d 1387, 1389 n. 6 (9th Cir.1996), and we affirm.

McNab filed a habeas corpus petition challenging Oregon's sex offender registration requirements. On appeal, McNab contends that the district court erred by dismissing his petition for lack of jurisdiction on the basis that McNab was not "in custody" within the meaning of section 2254(a). This contention lacks merit.

We have held that Washington's and California's sex offender registration statutes do not place a petitioner in custody because these statutes do not place "a significant restraint on ... physical liberty" by restricting the registrant's freedom to move about. Williamson v. Gregoire, 151 F.3d 1180, 1183-84 (9th Cir.1998) (Washington), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 119 S.Ct. 824, 142 L.Ed.2d 682 (1999); see Henry v. Lungren, 164 F.3d 1240, 1241-42 (9th Cir.1999) (California). Like their counterparts in California and Washington, sex offenders subject to registration in Oregon are free to move to a new place of residence so long as they notify law enforcement officials of their new address. Compare Cal.Penal Code § 290 (West 1998) and Wash. Rev.Code § 9A.44.130 (West 1998) with Or.Rev.Stat. §§ 181.595 & 181.596 (West 1997). Accordingly, because Oregon's sex offender registration requirements place no greater restraint on personal liberty than those of California and Washington, the Oregon law does not place McNab in custody within the meaning of section 2254(a). See Henry, 164 F.3d at 1241-42; Williamson, 151 F.3d at 1184.

AFFIRMED.

1 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for...

To continue reading

Request your trial
62 cases
  • Virsnieks v. Smith
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit
    • 2 Abril 2008
    ...custody requirement); Henry v. Lungren, 164 F.3d 1240, 1241-42 (9th Cir.1999) (same result under California's statute); McNab v. Kok, 170 F.3d 1246, 1247 (9th Cir.1999) (Oregon's statute); Williamson v. Gregoire, 151 F.3d 1180, 1184-85 (9th Cir.1998) (Washington's statute). In Gregoire, a f......
  • Umbarger v. Michigan
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Michigan
    • 5 Febrero 2013
    ...779, 781 (6th Cir. 2002) (Ohio sexual-predator designation); Erwin v. Edwards, 22 F. App'x 579 (6th Cir. 2001) (same); McNab v. Kok, 170 F.3d 1246, 1247 (9th Cir. 1999) (Oregon statute); Henry v. Lungren, 164 F.3d 1240, 1241-42 (9th Cir. 1999) (California statute); Williamson v. Gregoire, 1......
  • Preik v. Dist. Attorney of Allegheny Cnty., Civil Action No. 10 - 1612
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Pennsylvania
    • 12 Agosto 2011
    ...sex offender statute); Henry v. Lungren, 164 F.3d 1240, 1241-42 (9th Cir. 1999) (California sex offender statute); McNab v. Kok, 170 F.3d 1246, 1247 (9th Cir. 1999) (Oregon sex offender law); Coleman v. Arpaio, Civil No. 09-6308, 2010 WL 1707031, at *3 (D.N.J. Apr. 27, 2010) (collecting cas......
  • Fulbright v. Biltort
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Kansas
    • 27 Agosto 2018
    ...and Texas registration statutes); Leslie v. Randle, 296 F.3d 518, 522-23 (6th Cir. 2002) (Ohio registration statute); McNab v. Kok, 170 F.3d 1246, 1247 (9th Cir. 1999) (Oregon statute); Henry v. Lungren, 164 F.3d 1240, 1241-42 (9th Cir. 1999) (California statute); Williamson , 151 F.3d at 1......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT