McNeal v. Patterson

Decision Date28 April 1938
Docket Number6 Div. 262.
Citation236 Ala. 50,180 So. 773
PartiesMCNEAL v. PATTERSON ET AL.
CourtAlabama Supreme Court

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County; E. M. Creel, Judge.

Bill to foreclose a mortgage by Nettie Mae McNeal, a minor, by Maud McLure Kelly, as guardian of said minor, against Elijah Patterson and others, as Trustees of Friendship Baptist Church in Hooper City. From a decree sustaining demurrers to the bill, complainant appeals.

Reversed and remanded.

Basil A. Wood, of Birmingham, for appellant.

Harrison Kendrick and O. B. Cornelius, both of Birmingham, for appellees.

BROWN Justice.

The bill is filed by a minor through and by her guardian against the defendants "as Trustees of Friendship Baptist Church in Hooper City," to foreclose a mortgage executed by the defendants to a former guardian to secure an indebtedness which the bill alleges, including interest and taxes assessed against said property, "totals to-wit, $500.00 as of to-wit, September 27, 1937."

The bill avers:

"That the prior guardian of this ward named in the mortgage was J. B. Stephens, who died during to-wit, 1935.
"That on to-wit, December 11, 1936, respondents as trustees of the said church executed a mortgage covering the following described real estate as shown by a copy thereof hereto attached as Exhibit 'A.' "

Said Exhibit A appears to have been executed on December 11, 1926 and acknowledged by the respondents on December 7, 1926, as "officers and trustees of the Friendship Church * * * being duly authorized, by a vote of the majority of all the members of said church at a called meeting of the members of said church held on the 6th day of December, 1926, after notice of said meeting was served on all of the members of said church, to execute this mortgage to secure this loan, warranted free from all incumbrance and against any adverse claims."

The bill was filed October 5, 1937.

The defendants filed two demurrers to the bill, the first taking the points:

"I. For that the bill of complaint does not allege sufficient facts which in a Court of Equity entitles the complainant to the relief prayed for.
"II. For that the averments in said bill of complaint prove that the complainant is guilty of laches to such a degree as to defeat the complainant's prayer for relief in this cause."

The other assigned as grounds:

"1. The date of the execution of the alleged mortgage is not described with sufficient certainty.

"2. The allegations as to the date when the purported mortgage was executed are inconsistent and repugnant.

"3. It does not appear with sufficient certainty whether these defendants are sued in their individual capacity, or solely as Trustees."

The demurrers were sustained, and the appeal is from that decree.

The last note, according to the recitals in the mortgage, matured September 15, 1928. The demurrer, first above mentioned, was therefore not well taken. The first ground was, in effect, the general demurrer for want of equity. Alabama Lime & Stone Co. v. Adams, 222 Ala. 538, 133 So. 580.

The second ground was without merit, as it appears that the bill was filed well within the twenty years of the maturity of the last note. Hendley et al. v. First National Bank of Huntsville, 234 Ala. 535, 176 So. 348.

The defendants, as the averments of the bill show, are sued as trustees of the named church, and it...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Cook v. Whitehead
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Alabama
    • April 5, 1951
    ...general demurrer, 'there is no equity in the bill.' Alabama Lime & Stone Co. v. Adams, 222 Ala. 538, 133 So. 580, 581; McNeal v. Patterson et al., 236 Ala. 50, 180 So. 773; Equity Rule 14, Code 1940, Tit. 7 Appendix. The same is true as to the second ground of demurrer, which reads: 'That t......
  • Winston v. Winston
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Alabama
    • March 5, 1964
    ...are confined to the special grounds assigned. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. v. Cowley, 164 Ala. 331, 50 So. 1015; McNeal v. Patterson, 236 Ala. 50, 180 So. 773. In both law and equity cases, we have held that grounds of the demurrer that the complaint or the bill 'is vague, indefinite......
  • Haisten v. Ziglar
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Alabama
    • March 26, 1953
    ...statutory form which challenges the equity of the bill, and Ground 2 is but the general demurrer in different language. McNeal v. Patterson, 236 Ala. 50, 180 So. 773. The written instrument not being witnessed or acknowledged as required by law, is ineffective to pass the legal title, as gr......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT