McOllister v. State

Decision Date12 June 1913
Citation62 So. 767,183 Ala. 8
PartiesMcOLLISTER v. STATE.
CourtAlabama Supreme Court

Appeal from Circuit Court, Colbert County; C.P. Almon, Judge.

Tom McOllister, alias, etc., was convicted of crime, and he appeals. Affirmed.

Almon, Andrews & Peach, of Sheffield, for appellant.

R.C. Brickell, Atty. Gen., and W.L. Martin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

MAYFIELD, J.

The bill of exceptions in this case must be stricken on motion of the Attorney General. The time within which bills of exceptions must be presented to the trial court and signed by him is fixed by statute. Code, § 3019. They are required to be presented within 90 days from the day on which judgment is entered. The true date of presenting is required to be evidenced by the trial judge and by his signing his name to such indorsement.

The judgment in this case was entered on October 19, 1912, and the indorsement of the trial judge shows that it was presented to him on January 18, 1913. It was therefore not presented within the time prescribed by the statute and must be stricken on motion of the Attorney General, as is authorized by section 3020 of the Code. Cassell's Mill v. Strater Bros., 166 Ala. 274, 51 So. 969, and cases cited; Smith v. State, 166 Ala. 24, 52 So. 396; Edinburgh Co. v. Canterbury, 169 Ala. 444, 53 So. 823; Smith v. Smith, 173 Ala. 547, 55 So. 1009.

The record in this case has been carefully examined and searched for error as required by section 6264 et seq. of the Code, but no error has been found. It therefore results that the judgment of the lower court must be affirmed.

Affirmed.

DOWDELL, C.J., and ANDERSON and DE GRAFFENRIED, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Harper v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • June 1, 1915
    ... ... 388; ... Rainey v. State, 9 Ala.App. 51, 64 So. 168. The bill ... in this case was presented on the 92d day after entry of the ... judgment of conviction, and the motion of the Attorney ... General to strike the bill must prevail. McGay v ... State, 183 Ala. 41, 63 So. 70; McOllister v ... State, 183 Ala. 8, 62 So. 767 ... The ... indictment on which the defendant was tried embraces a charge ... of murder in the first degree, a capital felony, and the ... record does not show compliance with the statute requiring ... the case to be specially set for trial and ... ...
  • Fuller v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • June 5, 1923
    ... ... purpose of reviewing such questions as are presented by the ... motion. Sherman v. State, 15 Ala. App. 175, 72 So ... 755; Cassel's Mill et al. v. Strater Bros. Grain ... Co., 166 Ala. 274, 51 So. 969; McCary v. A. G. S. R ... R. Co., 182 Ala. 597, 62 So. 18; McOllister v ... State, 183 Ala. 8, 62 So. 767; Harper v. State, ... 13 Ala. App. 47, 69 So. 302 ... The act ... of the Legislature regulating the manner of taking appeals in ... criminal cases provides: ... "That appeals in criminal cases must be taken at the ... time of sentence or ... ...
  • Sherman v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • June 30, 1916
    ... ... motion for new trial, may be considered a part of the record ... to review the questions presented by the motion ... Cassells' Mill et al. v. Strater Bros. Grain ... Co., 166 Ala. 274, 51 So. 969; McCary v. A.G.S.R.R ... Co., 182 Ala. 597, 62 So. 18; McOllister v ... State, 183 Ala. 8, 62 So. 767; Harper v. State, ... 69 So. 302 ... The ... recent act regulating the manner of taking appeals in ... criminal cases provides: ... "That appeals in criminal cases must be taken at the ... time of sentence or confession of judgment [15 Ala.App ... ...
  • Bickley v. Hays
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • June 12, 1913
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT