McQueen v. State, 4 Div. 764.

Decision Date02 March 1943
Docket Number4 Div. 764.
Citation13 So.2d 59,31 Ala.App. 101
PartiesMcQUEEN v. STATE.
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

Rehearing Denied March 23, 1943.

E.O. Baldwin, of Andalusia, for appellant.

Wm N. McQueen, Acting Atty. Gen., and John J. Haynes, Asst Atty. Gen., for the State.

BRICKEN Presiding Judge.

The unfortunate tragedy involved in this prosecution was the result of a head-on collision between a 1929 roadster, driven by this appellant, and a 1939 Chevrolet automobile driven by the deceased, named in the indictment, Nathaniel Livings. Appellant was alone, in the decrepit car (as described) but in the car with Mr. Livings the testimony shows, were Mrs Livings, his wife and six other ladies. Deceased, his wife and a Mrs. Ballard were riding on the front seat of the Chevrolet car, and five ladies on the back seat. The detailed evidence of the res gestae disclosed, as stated, that Mr Livings was killed in the accident, and that three of the lady occupants of the car were also killed. The surviving four ladies were each badly wounded and crippled. The accident happened on the 2nd day of October, 1941, between 5:30 and 6 in the afternoon on the public highway (paved) between Andalusia and Opp, in Covington County. It appears from the evidence that this appellant was on his way to Andalusia, and the Livings car was traveling in the opposite direction, going East, toward the home of the occupants.

At the October, 1941, term of the circuit court, the grand jury found, and regularly returned into open court, an indictment against this appellant. The indictment contained three counts which charged him with the offense of manslaughter in the first degree. Said indictment, omitting formal parts and endorsements, reads as follows:

"1. The Grand Jury of said County charge that before the finding of this indictment James McQueen, alias Highpockets, unlawfully and intentionally, but without malice, killed Nathaniel Livings by running over him with an automobile.

"2. The Grand Jury of said County further charge that before the finding of this indictment James McQueen, alias Highpockets, unlawfully and intentionally, but without malice, killed Nathaniel Livings by striking him with an automobile.

"3. The Grand Jury of said County further charge that before the finding of this indictment James McQueen, alias Highpockets, unlawfully and intentionally, but without malice, killed Nathaniel Livings by driving an automobile into and upon a Chevrolet automobile in which the said Nathaniel Livings was riding in such a manner as to wreck the said Chevrolet automobile and thereby caused the death of said Nathaniel Livings, against the peace and dignity of the State of Alabama."

The cause was tried on August 6, 1942.

Before pleading to the merits the defendant filed demurrer to count 3 of the indictment. Said demurrer was properly overruled by the trial court. Hyde v State, 230 Ala. 243, 160 So. 237. The law is that an indictment must state the facts constituting the offense in ordinary and concise language, in such manner as to enable a person of common understanding to know what is intended. Words used in a statute to define an offense need not be strictly pursued in the indictment; it is sufficient to use other words conveying...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Associated Industries of Alabama, Inc. v. State, 3 Div. 316
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • April 8, 1975
    ...him to prepare his defense. Stinson v. State, 28 Ala.App. 559, 190 So. 303, certiorari denied 238 Ala. 272, 190 So. 305; McQueen v. State, 31 Ala.App. 101, 13 He whose conduct is defined as criminal is one who 'willfully' fails to do any of the acts denounced by the Corrupt Practices Law, a......
  • Philyaw v. City of Birmingham
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • May 28, 1951
    ...him to prepare his defense. Stinson v. State, 28 Ala.App. 559, 190 So. 303, certiorari denied 238 Ala. 272, 190 So. 305; McQueen v. State, 31 Ala.App. 101, 13 So.2d 59, certiorari denied 244 Ala. 251, 13 So.2d 61; Grattan v. State, 71 Ala. 344. The question of the sufficiency of the complai......
  • Jackson v. State, 8 Div. 61
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • May 13, 1952
    ...him to prepare his defense. Stinson v. State, 28 Ala.App. 559, 190 So. 303, certiorari denied 238 Ala. 272, 190 So. 305; McQueen v. State, 31 Ala.App. 101, 13 So.2d 59, certiorari denied 244 Ala. 251, 13 So.2d 61; Grattan v. State, 71 Ala. 344. The question of the sufficiency of the complai......
  • Cusimano v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • March 16, 1943
    ...12 So.2d 418 31 Ala.App. 99 CUSIMANO v. STATE. 7 Div. 685.Alabama Court of AppealsMarch 16, 1943 ... Appeal ... & McCord, of Gadsden, for appellant ... Wm ... N. McQueen, Acting Atty. Gen., and John W. Vardaman, Asst ... Atty. Gen., for the ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT