McSwean v. McSwean
Decision Date | 21 October 1920 |
Docket Number | 4 Div. 889 |
Citation | 204 Ala. 663,86 So. 646 |
Parties | McSWEAN v. McSWEAN. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Rehearing Denied Nov. 18, 1920
Appeal from Circuit Court, Dale County; J.S. Williams, Judge.
Bill by Elizabeth McSwean against R.L. McSwean to declare null and void a conveyance executed by her because of a failure to observe a condition subsequent. Decree for respondent, and complainant appeals. Affirmed.
H.L Martin, of Ozark, for appellant.
Riley & Stokes and Sollie & Sollie, all of Ozark, for appellee.
This bill was for the cancellation of a deed containing a condition subsequent, the nonobservance of which resulted in a forfeiture of estate at the election of the grantor. First Nat. Bank v. McIntosh, 79 So. 121 L.R.A.1918F, 353.
The pertinent conditions of the instant conveyance exhibited with the bill are:
What then is the meaning of the condition "to take care of, support, clothe, maintain and do whatever else may be necessary to make me reasonably comfortable during" the grantor's life? The expressions "take care of," "support," "clothe" and "maintain" are used in their ordinary acceptation as applicable to the condition, degree, and circumstances in life of the parties. The immediately succeeding clause, "whatever else may be necessary to make me reasonably comfortable during" grantor's life, under the ejusdem generis rule, will apply only to things or objects of the same general nature or classes enumerated. State v. W.U. Tel. Co., 196 Ala. 570, 72 So. 99. Such is the analogy of Eskridge v. Ditmars, 51 Ala. 245, where, with respect to "articles of comfort" in the husband's "support of the household," it was held that "comfort" was synonymous with "maintenance" and embraced food, raiment, suitable habitation, medicines, and medical and surgical assistance.
It may be well to say that the provision in the conveyance, "it is further agreed and understood that should I depart [this life] without having this deed of conveyance declared null and void by a proper proceeding in court or otherwise, this shall be conclusive that the said R.L. McSwean has faithfully carried out the condition of this deed of conveyance," was not the creation of a tenancy at will. Without a forfeiture of the other conditions of the conveyance, the conveyance may not be declared null and void. The...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hodge v. Joy
...that the rule of presumption was given application in chancery cases. Brassell v. Brassell, 205 Ala. 201, 87 So. 347; McSwean v. McSwean, 204 Ala. 663, 86 So. 646; Ray v. Watkins, 203 Ala. 683, 85 So. 25; v. Grey, 199 Ala. 152, 74 So. 62. This action of the parties in so taking the testimon......
-
Merchants' Nat. Bank of Mobile v. Hubbard
...L. & P. Co. v. Avant, 202 Ala. 404, 80 So. 497, 3 A. L. R. 384; Perry v. Southern Express Co., 202 Ala. 663, 81 So. 619; McSwean v. McSwean, 204 Ala. 663, 86 So. 646; City of Montgomery v. Smith, 205 Ala. 557, 88 671; authorities in State v. Goldstein, 207 Ala. 574, 93 So. 308; Central of G......
-
Erswell v. Ford
... ... 52, has been applied in courts of equity. Andrews ... v. Grey, 199 Ala. 152, 74 So. 62; Ray v ... Watkins, 203 Ala. 683, 85 So. 25; McSwean's Case, ... 204 Ala. 663, 86 So. 646; Brassell v. Brassell, 205 ... Ala. 201, 87 So. 347; Hodge v. Joy, 207 La. 198, 92 ... So. 171. However, we ... ...
-
Grissett v. State
...trial, where the evidence is ore tenus, is not affected by Acts 1915, p. 722. Hackett v. Cash, 196 Ala. 403, 72 So. 52; McSwean v. McSwean, 204 Ala. 663, 86 So. 646; Mallory S. S. Co. v. Druhan, 16 Ala. App. 438, So. 636. Observing this rule, we cannot say the court erred in overruling the ......
-
Drafting trusts that include broad invasion powers.
...of considering a remaindermen's interests when a "happiness" standard is used), 307 F. 2d 821, 825 (1962). (47) See Cooper v. Tallahala, 86 So. 646 (48) U.S. v. Powell (as to a "happiness" standard), 307 F. 2d 821, 825 (1962) (49) Security-Peoples Trust Company v. U.S., 238 F. Supp. 40, 48 ......