McWhorter v. Dunn
Decision Date | 22 January 2019 |
Docket Number | Case No. 4:13-CV-02150-RDP |
Parties | CASEY A. McWHORTER, Petitioner, v. JEFFERSON S. DUNN, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections, Respondent. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Northern District of Alabama |
CASEY A. McWHORTER, Petitioner, v. JEFFERSON S. DUNN, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections,1 Respondent.
Case No. 4:13-CV-02150-RDP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA MIDDLE DIVISION
January 22, 2019
Petitioner Casey A. McWhorter has petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging his 1994 capital murder conviction and death sentence in Alabama state court. McWhorter alleges that a variety of constitutional violations require reversal of his conviction and/or sentence. The parties have fully briefed McWhorter's claims. (Docs. 14, 20). After careful consideration of the record, the pleadings, and the applicable provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 2254, the court finds that McWhorter has not shown that he is due an evidentiary hearing, and he is not entitled to habeas relief. Accordingly, and for the reasons stated below, his petition for a writ of habeas corpus is due to be denied.
I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY .................................................................................................... 6
II. THE OFFENSE OF CONVICTION ..................................................................................... 8
III. THE SENTENCE .................................................................................................................. 9
IV. THE SCOPE OF FEDERAL HABEAS REVIEW .......................................................... 12
1. General principles ....................................................................................................... 14
2. Overcoming procedural default ................................................................................. 17
a. The "cause and prejudice" standard .................................................................... 18
i. "Cause" ............................................................................................................... 19
ii. "Prejudice" ......................................................................................................... 20
b. The "fundamental miscarriage of justice" standard .......................................... 21
1. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(e)(1) ................................................................................................. 22
2. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d) ...................................................................................................... 23
a. The meaning of § 2254(d)(1)'s "contrary to" clause ........................................... 25
b. The meaning of § 2254(d)(1)'s "unreasonable application" clause ................... 26c. The meaning of § 2254(d)(2)'s clause addressing an "unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the state court proceeding" .................................................................................................. 28
d. Evaluating state court factual determinations under 28 U.S.C. §§ 2254(d)(2) and (e)(1) ................................................................................................................ 29
1. The performance prong .............................................................................................. 34
2. The prejudice prong ................................................................................................... 36
3. Deference accorded state court findings of historical fact and decisions on the merits when evaluating ineffective assistance of counsel claims ................ 37
V. McWHORTER'S CLAIMS .................................................................................................. 39
1. The Parties' Arguments .............................................................................................. 39
2. Analysis ........................................................................................................................ 40
1. The Parties' Arguments .............................................................................................. 53
2. Analysis ........................................................................................................................ 57
1. Inadequate Investigation and Failure to Present Mitigating Evidence ................. 59a. The Parties' Arguments ........................................................................................ 61
b. Analysis .................................................................................................................. 65
2. Failure to Object to McWhorter's Being Transported to and from the Courtroom in Handcuffs ............................................................................................ 87
a. The Parties' Arguments ........................................................................................ 87
b. Analysis .................................................................................................................. 91
3. Failure to Object to the Trial Court's Preparation of a Sentencing Order Prior to the Sentencing Hearing ................................................................................ 92
a. The Parties' Arguments ........................................................................................ 92
b. Analysis .................................................................................................................. 93
4. The Rule 32 Court's Exclusion of Evidence Does Not Warrant an Evidentiary Hearing in this Court .................................................................................................. 95
a. The Parties' Arguments ........................................................................................ 95
b. Analysis .................................................................................................................. 97
1. The Parties' Arguments ............................................................................................ 100
2. Analysis ...................................................................................................................... 101
a. Procedural Default .............................................................................................. 101
b. Merits ................................................................................................................... 106
1. The Parties' Arguments ............................................................................................ 109
2. Analysis ...................................................................................................................... 128
1. The Parties' Arguments ............................................................................................ 140
2. Analysis ...................................................................................................................... 145
1. The Parties' Arguments ............................................................................................ 148
2. Analysis ...................................................................................................................... 156
1. The Parties' Arguments ............................................................................................ 161
2. Analysis ...................................................................................................................... 164
VI. CONCLUSION .................................................................................................................. 166
I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY
In May 1993, McWhorter was indicted in the Marshall County...
To continue reading
Request your trialSubscribers can access the reported version of this case.
You can sign up for a trial and make the most of our service including these benefits.
Why Sign-up to vLex?
-
Over 100 Countries
Search over 120 million documents from over 100 countries including primary and secondary collections of legislation, case law, regulations, practical law, news, forms and contracts, books, journals, and more.
-
Thousands of Data Sources
Updated daily, vLex brings together legal information from over 750 publishing partners, providing access to over 2,500 legal and news sources from the world’s leading publishers.
-
Find What You Need, Quickly
Advanced A.I. technology developed exclusively by vLex editorially enriches legal information to make it accessible, with instant translation into 14 languages for enhanced discoverability and comparative research.
-
Over 2 million registered users
Founded over 20 years ago, vLex provides a first-class and comprehensive service for lawyers, law firms, government departments, and law schools around the world.
Subscribers are able to see a list of all the cited cases and legislation of a document.
You can sign up for a trial and make the most of our service including these benefits.
Why Sign-up to vLex?
-
Over 100 Countries
Search over 120 million documents from over 100 countries including primary and secondary collections of legislation, case law, regulations, practical law, news, forms and contracts, books, journals, and more.
-
Thousands of Data Sources
Updated daily, vLex brings together legal information from over 750 publishing partners, providing access to over 2,500 legal and news sources from the world’s leading publishers.
-
Find What You Need, Quickly
Advanced A.I. technology developed exclusively by vLex editorially enriches legal information to make it accessible, with instant translation into 14 languages for enhanced discoverability and comparative research.
-
Over 2 million registered users
Founded over 20 years ago, vLex provides a first-class and comprehensive service for lawyers, law firms, government departments, and law schools around the world.
Subscribers are able to see a list of all the documents that have cited the case.
You can sign up for a trial and make the most of our service including these benefits.
Why Sign-up to vLex?
-
Over 100 Countries
Search over 120 million documents from over 100 countries including primary and secondary collections of legislation, case law, regulations, practical law, news, forms and contracts, books, journals, and more.
-
Thousands of Data Sources
Updated daily, vLex brings together legal information from over 750 publishing partners, providing access to over 2,500 legal and news sources from the world’s leading publishers.
-
Find What You Need, Quickly
Advanced A.I. technology developed exclusively by vLex editorially enriches legal information to make it accessible, with instant translation into 14 languages for enhanced discoverability and comparative research.
-
Over 2 million registered users
Founded over 20 years ago, vLex provides a first-class and comprehensive service for lawyers, law firms, government departments, and law schools around the world.
Subscribers are able to see the revised versions of legislation with amendments.
You can sign up for a trial and make the most of our service including these benefits.
Why Sign-up to vLex?
-
Over 100 Countries
Search over 120 million documents from over 100 countries including primary and secondary collections of legislation, case law, regulations, practical law, news, forms and contracts, books, journals, and more.
-
Thousands of Data Sources
Updated daily, vLex brings together legal information from over 750 publishing partners, providing access to over 2,500 legal and news sources from the world’s leading publishers.
-
Find What You Need, Quickly
Advanced A.I. technology developed exclusively by vLex editorially enriches legal information to make it accessible, with instant translation into 14 languages for enhanced discoverability and comparative research.
-
Over 2 million registered users
Founded over 20 years ago, vLex provides a first-class and comprehensive service for lawyers, law firms, government departments, and law schools around the world.
Subscribers are able to see any amendments made to the case.
You can sign up for a trial and make the most of our service including these benefits.
Why Sign-up to vLex?
-
Over 100 Countries
Search over 120 million documents from over 100 countries including primary and secondary collections of legislation, case law, regulations, practical law, news, forms and contracts, books, journals, and more.
-
Thousands of Data Sources
Updated daily, vLex brings together legal information from over 750 publishing partners, providing access to over 2,500 legal and news sources from the world’s leading publishers.
-
Find What You Need, Quickly
Advanced A.I. technology developed exclusively by vLex editorially enriches legal information to make it accessible, with instant translation into 14 languages for enhanced discoverability and comparative research.
-
Over 2 million registered users
Founded over 20 years ago, vLex provides a first-class and comprehensive service for lawyers, law firms, government departments, and law schools around the world.
Subscribers are able to see a visualisation of a case and its relationships to other cases. An alternative to lists of cases, the Precedent Map makes it easier to establish which ones may be of most relevance to your research and prioritise further reading. You also get a useful overview of how the case was received.
Why Sign-up to vLex?
-
Over 100 Countries
Search over 120 million documents from over 100 countries including primary and secondary collections of legislation, case law, regulations, practical law, news, forms and contracts, books, journals, and more.
-
Thousands of Data Sources
Updated daily, vLex brings together legal information from over 750 publishing partners, providing access to over 2,500 legal and news sources from the world’s leading publishers.
-
Find What You Need, Quickly
Advanced A.I. technology developed exclusively by vLex editorially enriches legal information to make it accessible, with instant translation into 14 languages for enhanced discoverability and comparative research.
-
Over 2 million registered users
Founded over 20 years ago, vLex provides a first-class and comprehensive service for lawyers, law firms, government departments, and law schools around the world.
Subscribers are able to see the list of results connected to your document through the topics and citations Vincent found.
You can sign up for a trial and make the most of our service including these benefits.
Why Sign-up to vLex?
-
Over 100 Countries
Search over 120 million documents from over 100 countries including primary and secondary collections of legislation, case law, regulations, practical law, news, forms and contracts, books, journals, and more.
-
Thousands of Data Sources
Updated daily, vLex brings together legal information from over 750 publishing partners, providing access to over 2,500 legal and news sources from the world’s leading publishers.
-
Find What You Need, Quickly
Advanced A.I. technology developed exclusively by vLex editorially enriches legal information to make it accessible, with instant translation into 14 languages for enhanced discoverability and comparative research.
-
Over 2 million registered users
Founded over 20 years ago, vLex provides a first-class and comprehensive service for lawyers, law firms, government departments, and law schools around the world.