Mead v. State, 5 Div. 12
| Citation | 475 So.2d 645 |
| Decision Date | 11 June 1985 |
| Docket Number | 5 Div. 12 |
| Parties | Wesley MEAD v. STATE. |
| Court | Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals |
Wesley Mead, pro se.
Charles A. Graddick, Atty. Gen. and H.P. Nelson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Wesley Mead, an inmate at Staton Correctional Facility, being of the opinion that he is not being credited with 224 days served in jail while awaiting disposition of his cases, petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus. In response, the state filed an exhibit with the trial court, called an "Inmate's Summary," which shows that Mead is serving time for an assault in the first degree and an assault in the second degree. Various other things are shown on the computer printout; some are intelligible, some are not. Some may only be guessed at. Contrary to the allegations of the state, the computer printout does not show in the English language that credit for 224 days has been given to Mead. When we all become experts in computers, then perhaps a coded printout will take the place of a response to a habeas corpus petition. A petition for writ of habeas corpus is a proper procedure to test whether the state has properly calculated the amount of time the inmate must serve in prison. Habeas corpus is in the nature of a civil remedy. Rule 8(b), Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure, states:
This exhibit, relied upon by the state as a defense, does not state in plain terms the matters that ought to be stated. The effect of the failure to deny is that the averments of the claim are deemed admitted. Rule 8(d), Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure. We do not believe it will impose too great a burden on the Board of Corrections to respond in grammatical language. The petition has sufficient merit to warrant a hearing in which it may be demonstrated whether or not this inmate has received credit for the time spent in jail before sentencing Accordingly this case is reversed and remanded to the circuit court for that court to conduct a hearing on this issue.
on the offense, as is required by the United States Constitution.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
All the Judges concur.
ON RETURN TO REMAND
On remand to the circuit court a proper affidavit was filed by the state showing appellant has been credited with his jail...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Ex parte Deramus
...spent 13 months in jail awaiting trial and that this time had not been credited to his sentence. The Court, quoting Mead v. State, 475 So.2d 645, 645 (Ala.Crim.App.1985), noted that "`[a] petition for writ of habeas corpus is a proper procedure to test whether the State has properly calcula......
-
Breach v. State, CR-95-1354
...a proper procedure to test whether the State has properly calculated the amount of time the inmate must serve in prison." Mead v. State, 475 So.2d 645 (Ala.Cr.App.1985). See Hardy v. State, 534 So.2d 328 (Ala.Cr.App.1986); Boutwell v. State, 488 So.2d 33 (Ala.Cr.App.1986). Where a person is......
-
Carlile v. ALABAMA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS
...his release date, this court cannot tell from it whether he has in fact received the proper amount of good time due him. Mead v. State, 475 So.2d 645 (Ala.Cr.App.1985). Since the rest of the record sheds no further light upon the method of appellant's pre-parole IGT compilation, we deem it ......
-
Johnson v. State, CR-94-1214.
...proper procedure to test whether the State has properly calculated the amount of time the inmate must serve in prison." Mead v. State, 475 So.2d 645 (Ala.Cr.App. 1985). See Hardy v. State, 534 So.2d 328 (Ala.Cr.App.1986); Boutwell v. State, 488 So.2d 33 We hold that the appellant's petition......