Mears v. Warden of Md. Penitentiary, 28
Decision Date | 21 October 1959 |
Docket Number | No. 28,28 |
Citation | 155 A.2d 72,220 Md. 682 |
Parties | Wade Hampton MEARS, Jr. v. WARDEN OF the MARYLAND PENITENTIARY. Post Conviction |
Court | Maryland Court of Appeals |
Before BRUNE, C. J., and HENDERSON, HAMMOND, PRESCOTT and HORNEY, JJ.
In his application for leave to appeal from the denial and dismissal of his petition for post conviction relief, the applicant assigned two reasons for allowing his appeal. He contends (i) that the evidence on which he was convicted of a violation of the narcotics law was obtained by means of an illegal search and seizure in violation of his constitutional rights and (ii) that--other than the alleged prohibited evidence- --there was no evidence legally sufficient to sustain a conviction.
The contention concerning the legality and constitutionality of the search and seizure although available on appeal if preserved below cannot be raised under post conviction procedure. Banks v. Warden, Md.1959, 151 A.2d 897. The second contention, which is without merit in any event, was not raised below.
Application denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ralph v. Warden of Md. Penitentiary, 24
...in a P.C.P.A. proceeding. Hall v. Warden, 224 Md. 662, 168 A.2d 373, cert. den. 368 U.S. 867, 82 S.Ct. 78, 7 L.Ed.2d 65; Mears v. Warden, 220 Md. 682, 155 A.2d 72; Banks v. Warden, 220 Md. 652, 151 A.2d Contention (c), with reference to alleged illegal arrest, search and seizure, not having......
-
Warrington v. Warden of Md. Penitentiary
...these cannot be raised in a post conviction case (illegal arrest and search, Brooks v. Warden, 218 Md. 650, 145 A.2d 569; Mears v. Warden, 220 Md. 682, 155 A.2d 72; insufficiency of the evidence and inadequacy of counsel, Banks v. Warden, Md., 155 A.2d 697). Judge Byrnes found the fourth to......
-
Rayne v. Warden, Md. Penitentiary
...(11) That he, a Negro, was tried before an all-white jury. Contention (1) is not available in a proceeding of this nature. Mears v. Warden, 220 Md. 682, 155 A.2d 72. Just what the petitioner claims under (6) is not perfectly clear. It seems, however, to be another attempt to raise a very si......
-
Hall v. Warden, Md. Penitentiary, 48
...Md. 134, 156 A.2d 453. See also Rayne v. Warden, 223 Md. 688, 690, 165 A.2d 474; Rice v. Warden, 221 Md. 604, 156 A.2d 632; Mears v. Warden, 220 Md. 682, 155 A.2d 72; Banks v. Warden, 220 Md. 652, 151 A.2d 897, holding that the illegality of a search and seizure may not be raised in Post Co......