MED. GEN. CON., INC. v. CHIEF JUDGE OF THIR. JUD. CIRCUIT
Citation | 840 So.2d 1008 |
Decision Date | 13 February 2003 |
Docket Number | No. SC01-1398., No. SC01-1396 |
Parties | MEDIA GENERAL CONVERGENCE, INC., et al., Petitioners, v. CHIEF JUDGE OF the THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, Respondent. Charles J. Crist, Jr., et al., Petitioners, v. Chief Judge of the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit, Respondent. |
Court | United States State Supreme Court of Florida |
Gregg D. Thomas, Carol Jean LoCicero and James J. McGuire of Holland & Knight LLP, Tampa, FL; Thomas E. Warner, Solicitor General, and T. Kent Wetherell, II, Richard A. Hixson, and Matthew J. Conigliaro, Deputy Solicitors General, Tallahassee, FL; and Patricia R. Gleason, General Counsel, Office of the Attorney General, Tallahassee, FL, for Petitioners.
C. Steven Yerrid and Richard C. Alvarez of the Yerrid Law Firm, Special Counsel to the Office of the Chief Judge, Tampa, FL, for Respondent.
W. Robert Vezina, III, Mary Piccard Vance, and Frederick J. Springer of Vezina, Lawrence & Piscitelli, P.A., Tallahassee, FL; and W. Dexter Douglass and Thomas P. Crapps of the Douglass Law Firm, P.A., Tallahassee, FL, for the Florida Conference of Circuit Court Judges, Amicus Curiae.
We have for review a decision of the Second District Court of Appeal, which certified a question to be of great public importance. See Media Gen. Convergence, Inc. v. Chief Judge of the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit, 794 So.2d 631, 636 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)
.1 We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. Because the Second District's certified question is broader than the actual dispute in this case, we rephrase and divide the question to address the documents that were the subject of the dispute in this case:
For the reasons that follow, we answer the first rephrased certified question in the affirmative, and the second rephrased certified question in the negative. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in this opinion, we quash the Second District's decision and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Petitioners Media General Convergence, Inc., and Media General Operations, Inc., were, respectively, the owner of television station NewsChannel 8/WFLA-TV ("WFLA") and the publisher of The Tampa Tribune newspaper ("the Tribune").2 This review proceeding involves requests WFLA and the Tribune made to Judge F. Dennis Alvarez, Chief Judge of the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit,3 for access to records involving "information about complaints of sexual harassment and/or sexually inappropriate comments or behavior made against Hillsborough Circuit Judge Edward Ward." These records requests will be referred to as the "Judge Ward records."
Although Chief Judge Alvarez did not produce any records to the petitioners and no records were produced under seal to the Second District, we are able to determine additional material facts based on the appendices filed by both parties before the Second District and made a part of the record in this case. These appendices include records supplied by the Judicial Qualifications Commission ("JQC") to the petitioners.
The records released by the JQC indicate that Chief Judge Alvarez learned of complaints regarding Judge Ward's behavior toward other circuit court judges and judicial assistants, and received information regarding this behavior. The records received or generated by Chief Judge Alvarez include affidavits executed by two judicial assistants regarding behavior by Judge Ward that the judicial assistants considered inappropriate;4 e-mails between Judge Ward and one of the judicial assistants, as well as e-mails between Judge Ward and another circuit judge; and memoranda by Chief Judge Alvarez's employee memorializing Chief Judge Alvarez's discussions during a meeting with Judge Ward involving the complaints against him and the follow-up meeting with the judicial assistant and the judge for whom she worked.
Some time after the petitioners' initial request for the Judge Ward records, the JQC found probable cause to believe that Judge Ward had sent sexually explicit emails and made inappropriate overtures to two female Hillsborough County Circuit Judges and two female judicial assistants. The JQC filed formal charges against Judge Ward on March 1, 2000, and on that same day, the Tribune renewed its request in writing to Chief Judge Alvarez for "any and all documents and materials relating to complaints and/or allegations of inappropriate conduct" concerning Judge Ward. However, the Tribune did not indicate in its request that the JQC had found probable cause in the Judge Ward case. On March 2, 2000, WFLA requested the Judge Ward records telephonically.
Responding to the requests by separate letters dated March 6, 2000, Chief Judge Alvarez stated that "any records in my custody pertaining to your request have already been furnished to the [JQC] pursuant to its request." Furthermore, Chief Justice Alvarez explained:
On that same day, WFLA and the Tribune made a second request for access to the following documents:
any correspondence, electronic correspondence, documents or other records made or received by the Chief Judge's Office or the Court Administrator's Office concerning fraternization, romantic relationships or sexual contact between any Hillsborough County Circuit Court or County Court Judge, and any personnel assigned to any courthouse located in Hillsborough County, whether such personnel are employed by the state of Florida, Hillsborough County, the Hillsborough County Sheriff's Office, or some other private or governmental entity.
These records will be referred to as the "fraternization records." Chief Judge Alvarez denied the request for the fraternization records, explaining that "[t]o the extent that any judicial records you have requested exist, please be advised that such records would be confidential and exempt from public accessibility under Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.051(c)(3)(A)."6
After Judge Alvarez denied access to both sets of records, WFLA and the Tribune filed a petition for a writ of mandamus in the Second District, seeking an order compelling Chief Judge Alvarez to disclose the requested records.7 The Second District denied the petition but certified a question of great public importance. See Media Gen. Convergence, 794 So.2d at 636
. The Second District majority first explained that whether the documents at issue were public depended on "whether they are `judicial records' within the meaning of Florida Rule of Judicial Procedure 2.051." Id. at 633. The Second District concluded as follows:
Id. Furthermore, the Second District concluded that to the extent the requested documents constituted public records, the documents would be exempt from disclosure under rule 2.051(c)(8), which exempts from public disclosure records "deemed to be confidential by court rule." Id. at 635.
In a dissenting opinion, Acting Chief Judge Fulmer concluded that the records at issue constituted judicial records subject to public disclosure. See id. at 636 (Fulmer, A.C.J., dissenting). Judge Fulmer explained that the majority construed the public records provisions too narrowly, and that "[t]he administrative responsibilities of a chief judge are not so rigid as to enable this court to predetermine exactly what...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
In re Amendments to Rules of Jud. Admin., SC05-173.
... ... Circuit Judge, Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Miami, FL, for ... , FL, on behalf of Media General Operations, Inc.; Jonathan D. Kaney, Jr., General Counsel, First ... v. Chief Judge of the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit, 840 ... Op. Atty. Gen. Fla. 80-57 (1980); Wootton v. Cook, 590 So.2d ... ...
-
Rhea v. Dist. Bd. of Trs. of Santa Fe Coll.
... ... Boca Burger, Inc. v. Forum, 912 So.2d 561, 567 (Fla.2005). In ... Hernandez v. Tallahassee Med. Ctr., Inc., 896 So.2d 839, 841 (Fla. 1st DCA ... , 863 So.2d 149, 151 (Fla.2003); Media Gen. Convergence, Inc. v. Chief Judge of the th Judicial Circuit, 840 So.2d 1008, 1013 (Fla.2003). A citizen's ... ...
-
Rhea v. Dist. Bd. of Trs. of Santa Fe Coll.
... ... THEREOF IF FILED An appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County. Victor L. Hulslander, ... Boca Burger, Inc. v. Forum , 912 So. 2d 561, 567 (Fla. 2005). In ... Hernandez v. Tallahassee Med. Ctr., Inc. , 896 Page 6 So. 2d 839, 841 (Fla ... 2d 149, 151 (Fla. 2003); Media Gen. Convergence, Inc. v. Chief Judge of the ... ...
-
Palm Beach Newspapers, Inc. v. Limbaugh
... ... An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Monroe County, Sandra Taylor, Judge ... I, § 24(a), Fla. Const.; see also Media Gen. Convergence, Inc. v. Chief Judge, 840 So.2d ... ...