Medical West Bldg. Corp. v. E. L. Zoernig & Co.
| Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | As the defendant was obviously aware, the situation which gave it the right to cancel its lease was the plaintiff's termination of Richard Zoernig's services as building manager. Although defendant points out that the correspondence from plaintiff's |
| Citation | Medical West Bldg. Corp. v. E. L. Zoernig & Co., 414 S.W.2d 287 (Mo. 1967) |
| Decision Date | 10 April 1967 |
| Docket Number | No. 51952,No. 1,51952,1 |
| Parties | MEDICAL WEST BUILDING CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. E. L. ZOERNIG & COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent |
Guilfoil, Caruthers, Symington, Montrey & Petzall, Rexford H. Caruthers, Gerald M. Smith, Darold E. Crotzer, Jr., St. Louis, for appellant.
William C. Maier, Charles R. Judge, Dubail, Judge & Kilker, Arnot L. Sheppard, Gentry, Bryant & Sheppard, St. Louis, for respondent.
WELBORN, Commissioner.
This is an action by Medical West Building Corporation, owner, for damages for breach of lease by E. L. Zoernig & Company, tenant. A jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for $17,220 damages, plus $3,616.20 interest. Upon motion of the defendant, the trial court set aside the verdict and entered judgment for defendant. Plaintiff has appealed.
Medical West Building Corporation was the owner of an office building located in St. Louis County. E. L. Zoernig & Company leased a suite of offices in the Medical West Building for a term of five years, from March 1, 1957 to February 28, 1962, at a rental of $400 per month. The Security Loan & Discount Corporation, in which the Zoernig Company had a financial interest and of which Richard J. Zoernig was the executive officer, had a ten-year contract with the owner to manage the building.
In February, 1958, O. S. Rudman and Ann Rudman acquired from Zoernig the majority stock of the Medical West Corporation. As a part of the transaction, the Rudmans agreed to cause Medical West to employ Richard J. Zoernig as building manager. The agreement referred to the Zoernig Company lease and then provided:
'If at any time during the term of the present lease or the renewal thereof as aforesaid, the employment of Richard J. Zoernig as Building Manager is terminated by the corporation, then the lessee shall have the right to cancel the remaining term of said lease without penalty provided notice of such cancellation is given within ninety (90) days following the effective date of termination of such employment.'
Medical West and Richard Zoernig entered into a management agreement for a one-year term, beginning February 15, 1958, with right of renewal.
In March, 1958, the new owners decided to alter the policy regarding parking facilities provided for tenants and their patients or customers. This action eventually produced the litigation reported in Bryan v. Medical West Building Corporation, Mo.App., 345 S.W.2d 389. Richard Zoernig disagreed with the new policy and declined to circulate the notice of it to the tenants.
On March 25, 1958, a meeting, called by Rudman, was held. In attendance were about fifteen tenants, who were also stockholders of Medical West, Mr. Rudman, and Selig Oxenhandler, a real estate broker who had participated in the negotiations leading to Rudman's stock purchase. Oxenhandler, although not a stockholder, had been elected vice-president of Medical West. An attorney for Medical West and an attorney for some of the tenants were also present.
According to Rudman, the tenants voiced numerous protests about Zoernig's management of the premises, including inadequate cleaning, lack of attention to complaints and varying rental charges. According to Rudman, the parking issue was discussed merely by way of explanation to the stockholders of the corporation's financial problems. Oxenhandler stated that various complaints of the tenants were aired, but that parking was discussed only insofar as the tenants were complaining that employees of tenants were occupying an excessive amount of parking space.
Testifying as a witness for the defendant, the attorney representing the stockholders stated that the parking issue was the only matter discussed at the meeting. According to him, Rudman explained the corporation's financial position and the necessity of charging for parking. A spokesman for the tenants replied that they were entitled to free parking under their leases and intended to insist upon it, regardless of the 'supposed bad condition of the finances of the corporation.' The witness stated that nothing was settled at the meeting.
The next day, Rudman and Oxenhandler met with Zoernig and told him of the complaints against him which had been voiced at the meeting. According to Rudman, Zoernig was upset, resentful of the tenants' lack of appreciation for his efforts and said that he did not wish to have anything more to do with them. Rudman quoted Zoernig as saying '(You can) have the management.' Oxenhandler testified that Zoernig was disgusted with the tenants' attitude and 'didn't care whether or not he continued to take care of the thing or do or have anything to do with most of them because * * * he felt that those that complained the most were those he did the most for.' Oxenhandler also stated that before the meeting concluded, Zoernig instructed his secretary to turn the keys over to Oxenhandler that afternoon.
Zoernig's version of the meeting was somewhat different. According to him, Oxenhandler had previously begun to take a hand in the management of the building and Zoernig had done nothing after Oxenhandler began to take over the management duties. Zoernig testified that, when Rudman and Oxenhandler came to his office, Zoernig denied that he stated he wanted to quit as manager.
Rudman stated that immediately after the meeting with Zoernig he asked Oxenhandler to take over the management of the building. Oxenhandler got the keys from Zoernig's secretary that afternoon and later sent out the April 1 rent notices. Subsequently, the management files were turned over to Oxenhandler by Zoernig's secretary.
On March 27, 1958, Oxenhandler presented to Zoernig for his signature a typewritten letter addressed to Medical West, stating: 'I, Richard J. Zoernig, wish to be relieved of my responsibility as building manager of the Medical West Building effective as of March 31, 1958.' Zoernig refused to sign the document.
On March 29, Oxenhandler asked Charles Judge, an attorney for the Zoernig Company and one of the original stockholders of Medical West: 'Why doesn't Richard Zoernig give up the management of the building?' Judge replied: 'If you give him a little time, have a little patience, he may come to that conclusion and be willing to step down on the basis of E. L. Zoernig moving out of the building.' Oxenhandler, according to Judge, replied: 'I believe something like that can be worked out.'
On April 11, 1958, Oxenhandler, as vice-president of Medical West, advised Richard L. Zoernig of the receipt of the records and keys. In the letter he stated: 'This action on your part is construed by this company to be your voluntary relinquishing of your duties of building manager and therefore terminates your Management Contract as of April 1, 1958.'
On April 15, 1958, on behalf of Richard Zoernig, Judge addressed a letter to Oxenhandler in which he stated:
'If it is the desire of the Corporation to negotiate a termination of this Management Contract I will be glad to discuss this matter with you.'
On April 24, 1958, Gideon Schiller, of the law firm of Ackerman, Schiller & Lake, and acting on behalf of Medical West, wrote Judge as follows:
'Should you care to discuss the matter with me please give me a call at your convenience.'
On June 4, 1958, Judge, as attorney for Zoernig & Company, addressed a letter to Mr. Rudman as President of Medical West Building Corporation. In this letter he stated:
'Under the terms of the agreement entered into on February 3, 1958 by and between Richard J. Zoernig, Emil L. Zoernig and Charles R. Judge, first parties and O. S. Rudman and Ann Rudman, second parties, pertaining to the sale of controlling stock of Medical West Building Corporation, it was provided that if the employment of Richard J. Zoernig as building manager of Medical West Building were terminated, the lessee of Suite 203 shall have the right to cancel the remaining term of its lease without penalty upon notice given within ninety (90) days following the effective date of termination.
...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
UAW-CIO Local No. 31 Credit Union v. Royal Ins. Co., Ltd.
...may arise under certain circumstances from silence or inaction as well as from words or actions." See also Medical West Building Corp. v. E. L. Zoernig & Co., 414 S.W.2d 287 (Mo.1967). However, it is equally clear that mere innocent silence or inaction will not work an estoppel, Mahen v. Ta......
-
Peerless Supply Co. v. Industrial Plumbing & Heating Co.
...the provisions of Civil Rule 55.10, V.A.M.R., and the burden of proof is upon the party asserting it. Medical West Building Corporation v. E. L. Zoernig & Company, Mo., 414 S.W.2d 287; Emery v. Brown Shoe Company, supra; Kitchen v. McCullough, Mo.App., 428 S.W.2d 907. Every fact essential t......
-
Ronollo v. Jacobs
...v. Wilks, 357 S.W.2d 908, 913 (Mo.1962). The party asserting an estoppel bears the burden of proving it. Medical W. Bldg. Corp. v. E.L. Zoernig & Co., 414 S.W.2d 287, 293-94 (Mo.1967). Every fact essential to create estoppel must be established by clear and satisfactory evidence. Peerless S......
-
Smith v. Old Warson Development Co.
...trial. The trial court should have ruled the alternative motion for new trial. Civil Rule 72.02, V.A.M.R. In Medical West Building Corp. v. E. L. Zoernig & Co., Mo., 414 S.W.2d 287, the court stated: '* * * Litigants who elect to take advantage of the privilege of combining a motion for jud......