Medlock v. Aycock
| Decision Date | 28 June 1915 |
| Docket Number | (No. 5961.) |
| Citation | 86 S.E. 455,16 Ga. App. 813 |
| Parties | MEDLOCK . v. AYCOCK, Sheriff, et al. |
| Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
On Rehearing, Oct. 1, 1915.
(Syllabus by the Court.)
6. Instructions.
The fifth, sixth, and seventh grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial, complaining of certain excerpts from the charge of the court, are without merit.These excerpts, when considered in connection with the entire charge, are not objectionable for any of the reasons assigned, and were not prejudicial to the defendant.
Error from City Court of Madison; K. S. Anderson, Judge.
Action by R. B. Aycock, Sheriff, and others, for use, etc., against C. O. Medlock.Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.Affirmed.
M. C.Few, of Madison, for plaintiff in error.
E. H. George, of Madison, for defendants in error.
BROYLES, J. Judgment affirmed.
On Rehearing.
After a careful consideration of the motion for rehearing and of the argument on rehearing, the court adheres to its original decision.
Judgment affirmed.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
5 cases
-
Rd.Way Express Inc v. Mcbroom
...against such a demurrer, and any defects therein which can be cured by amendment must be reached by special demurrer." Medlock v. Aycock, 16 Ga.App. 813, 86 S.E. 455. In Medlock v. Wood, 4 Ga.App. 368, 61 S.E. 516, the court said: "The answer of a defendant will resist a general demurrer or......
-
Roadway Express v. McBroom
... ... any defects therein which can be cured by amendment must be ... reached by special demurrer." Medlock v ... Aycock, 16 Ga.App. 813, 86 S.E. 455. In Medlock v ... Wood, 4 Ga.App. 368, 61 S.E. 516, the court said: ... "The answer of a defendant ... ...
-
Spindel v. National Homes Corp.
...for defendant in error. FRANKUM, Judge. "To be subject to general demurrer, a petition must be utterly lifeless.' Medlock v. Aycock, 16 Ga.App. 813, 86 S.E. 455.' Gunby v. Turner, 194 Ga. 378, 381(2), 21 S.E.2d 640; Johnson v. John Deere Plow Co., 214 Ga. 645, 647(1), 106 S.E.2d 901. While ......
-
Customers Loan Corp. v. Jones
...v. Monroe, 45 Ga.App. 496, 165 S.E. 302), and a petition is not subject to general demurrer unless it is lifeless. Medlock v. Aycock, 16 Ga.App. 813, 86 S.E. 455.' Proof of violation and proof of compliance are matters addressed to a fact finding body and cannot be determined as a matter of......
Get Started for Free