Meigs v. London Assur Co.
| Decision Date | 03 February 1905 |
| Docket Number | 15. |
| Citation | 134 F. 1021 |
| Parties | MEIGS v. LONDON ASSUR. CO. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit |
Samuel Dickson, for plaintiff in error.
G. W. Pepper, for defendant in error.
Before DALLAS and GRAY, Circuit Judges, and BRADFORD, District Judge.
The able argument which has been submitted on behalf of the plaintiff in error has had our careful attention, but it has failed to convince us that any error was committed by the Circuit Court in its decision of this case. The learned judge carefully considered it in an opinion which, we think, completely vindicated his conclusion. 126 F. 781. Upon that opinion, therefore, the judgment is affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Ideal Pump & Manufacturing Co. v. American Central Insurance Co.
... ... Lumbermen's Ins. Co. (Wash.), 88 P. 128; Montana ... Stables Co. v. Union Assur. Co. (Wash.), 101 P. 882; ... Guthrie Laundry Co. v. Northern Assur. Co. (Ok.), 87 ... P. 649; ... 337, 73 N.E. 34; Shepard v ... Germania Fire Ins. Co. (Mich.), 130 N.W. 626; Meigs v ... London Assur. Co. (C. C. A.), 134 F. 1021 ... ... ... ...
-
Kelly v. New England Mut. Life Ins. Co.
... ... Christy (C. C. A.) 294 F. 208. This is clearly the holding in this circuit. Meigs v. London Assur. Co. (C. C.) 126 F. 781, affirmed (C. C. A.) 134 F. 1021. In apparent conflict are ... ...
-
American Central Ins. Co. of St. Louis, Mo. v. McHose
...forbids a waiver of any of its provisions except in writing, parol evidence to establish an oral waiver is not admissible. Meigs v. London Assurance Co., 134 Fed. 1021 (C. C. A. 3rd), affirming (C. C.) 126 F. 781; Fidelity-Phenix Fire Ins. Co. v. Queen City Bus & Transfer Co. (C. C. A.) 3 F......