Meily v. Knox

Decision Date27 October 1915
Docket NumberNo. 10075.,10075.
Citation269 Ill. 463,110 N.E. 56
PartiesMEILY et al. v. KNOX et al.
CourtIllinois Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Error to Appellate Court, First District, on Appeal from Superior Court, Cook County; M. L. McKinley, Judge.

Certiorari to review a judgment of the Appellate Court affirming the decree of the superior court, dismissing for want of equity a bill by Eugenia Meily and others against Robert S. Knox, executor, and others. Judgment affirmed.S. C. Irving, of Chicago, for plaintiffs in error.

Foreman, Levin & Robertson, of Chicago, for defendants in error.

DUNN, J.

[1] The superior court of Cook county, after a hearing, dismissed for want of equity a bill brought for the purpose of having the will and codicil of Sarah J. Tucker construed and the legacies provided in the third clause of the will and codicildeclared to be valid and directed to be paid by the executor. The complainants appealed to the Appellate Court for the First District, which affirmed the decree, and a writ of certiorari has been allowed to bring the record before this court for review.

Mrs. Sarah J. Tucker executed her will on March 2, 1909. The third clause is as follows:

‘Third.-I give and devise unto my sisters, Mary Wood, Nellie Mildren, Bessie Knox, Annie Detweiler, Lottie Poland and Emily Villa, and unto my brother, William J. Cooke, share and share alike, my property located in Lima, Allen County, Ohio, and more particularly described as follows [description of property], to be sold by them and out of the proceeds thereof of to pay the following bequests, so far as the proceeds will go, in the order indicated:

(a) To my stepson, Chester Tucker, of Lima, Ohio, two thousand dollars ($2,000.)

(b) To my stepdaughter, Mrs. George H. Meily, (née Eugenia Tucker,) of Lima, Ohio, one thousand dollars ($1,000.)

(c) Two thousand dollars ($2,000) for the erection of a monument on my lot in Oakwood Cemetery.

(d) Fifteen hundred dollars ($1,500) to be expended to place a memorial window in the Episcopal church founded by my beloved husband in said Lima, Ohio.

(e) One thousand dollars ($1,000) to be invested by the trustees of the Oakwood Cemetery of Chicago, Illinois, for the purpose of defraying the expenses of keping my lot in said Oakwood Cemetery in good order and condition.’

There was a residuary clause, disposing of all the residue of her property, and her nephew, Robert S. Knox, was named as executor. The next day after executing the will Mrs. Tucker executed a codicil, which is as follows:

‘Codicil.-I, Sarah J. Tucker, of Chicago, declare this to be my first codicil to my last will executed on March 2, 1909:

‘1. Devise all of the real estate of which I may die seised, and all of the shares of capital stock in, Chicago Railways, American Smelting, United States Steel owned by me at my death, to my sister Lottie Poland, as trustee, with full power to sell same or any part or any interest therein, convey perfect title to said property or any part; and I do hereby direct my said trustee to distribute the proceeds realized from the sale of any or all of said property equally between my sisters and brother named in my last will and testament, the proceeds realized from the sale of the Lima, Ohio, property, however, to be subject to the specific bequests provided in and by my said last will and testament in paragraph 3 thereof.

‘I do hereby reaffirm my last will of March 2, 1909, except only as modified and controlled by this my first codicil, dated March 3, 1909.’

On December 2, 1909, the testatrix sold the property in Lima, Ohio, and received therefor...

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • State v. Underwood
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • 24 Enero 1939
    ... ... allowed attorneys' fees or costs. 69 C. J. 902; ... Strauss v. Strauss, 12 N.E.2d 701; Holly v. Knox ... (Ill.) 110 N.E. 56; Hartnett v. Langan, 222 ... S.W. 403. The trial court was in error in undertaking to ... require the trustee to file a ... ...
  • Oglesby v. Springfield Marine Bank
    • United States
    • Illinois Supreme Court
    • 14 Noviembre 1946
    ...if a testator, subsequent to the execution of the will, conveys the land, there is no res upon which the will may operate. Meily v. Knox, 269 Ill. 463, 110 N.E. 56;Yott v. Yott, 265 Ill. 364, 106 N.E. 959. This principle likewise has no application for, as previously held, Emma G. Oglesby d......
  • In re Mary L. Barrows' Estate
    • United States
    • Vermont Supreme Court
    • 6 Octubre 1931
    ...292 Pa. 470, 141 A. 294, 295; Gelbach v. Shively, 67 Md. 498, 10 A. 247, 248; Meily v. Knox, 191 Ill.App. 126, 137, 138, affirmed 269 Ill. 463, 110 N.E. 56; Ford v. Cottrell, 141 Tenn. 169, 207 734, 736, 737; In re Martin, 25 R.I. 1, 54 A. 589, 594, 595. The subject of the gift is not the r......
  • Stowell v. Lynch
    • United States
    • Illinois Supreme Court
    • 27 Octubre 1915
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT