Meisner v. United States, 5367.
Citation | 295 F. 866 |
Decision Date | 28 February 1924 |
Docket Number | 5367. |
Parties | MEISNER v. UNITED STATES. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Western District of Missouri |
George B. Reinhardt, of Kansas City, Mo., for plaintiff.
C. C Madison, U.S. Atty., and H. L. Donnelly, Asst. U.S. Atty both of Kansas City, Mo., and John M. George, Atty. U.S Veteran's Bureau, of Washington, D.C.
This is a suit to recover on a policy of war risk insurance. The plaintiff is the beneficiary named by the deceased soldier Robert R. Parks. The case was tried in part upon an agreed statement of facts, which, in so far as is material to this discussion, contains the following recitals:
Robert R. Parks was born May 4, 1890. In the month of November 1914, Mr. and Mrs. Henry Grafke were engaged in farming near Kansas City, in the state of Kansas. The plaintiff is their daughter, and resided with her parents prior to November, 1914, up to and including June, 1918, and thereafter. In the month of November, 1914, the said Robert R. Parks came to the home of Mr. and Mrs. Grafke, and while there he worked about the farm, but received no stipulated compensation for his services; that from November, 1914, to April 10, 1917, he remained continuously with Mr. and Mrs. Grafke and worked about the farm, without any agreement for wages or any other compensation for his services. He ate at the same table with the other members of the family. He was never married, had no living parents, brothers, or sisters, or any living relatives by blood, known to him during said period. He entered the military service of the United States in the city of Chicago, Ill., on April 18, 1917. January 18, 1918, he executed his application for insurance in the sum of $10,000, naming the plaintiff his sole beneficiary, and describing her in said application as his cousin. The policy was subsequently issued as of that date. Robert R. Parks lost his life on June 6, 1918, during an air raid in France, while he was in the military service of the United States. All of the premiums due the United States on said insurance policy were paid in full up to the time of his death.
In addition thereto at the trial the recital of facts in the petition was admitted as part of the agreed facts submitted to the court. These recitals are as follows:
Plaintiff claims under subdivisions 4a and 5a of the amendment to section 22 of the War Risk Insurance Act, approved December 24, 1919 (41 Stat. 371 (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, Sec. 514mmm)), which read as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Funk, No. 05AP-230 (OH 4/27/2006)
...v. United States (C.A.10, 1947), 162 F.2d 79, 85. See, also, Banks v. United States (C.A.2, 1959), 267 F.2d 535; Meisner v. United States (W.D.Mo.1924), 295 F. 866; Miller v. United States (C.A.8, 1942), 123 F.2d {¶72} With the foregoing authorities in mind, we must review the evidence addu......
-
Brown v. Brown
...Black's Law Dictionary 320 (3d ed. 1933). See also Albright v. Albright, 116 Ohio St. 668, 157 N.E. 760, 763 (1927); Meisner v. United States, 295 F. 866, 868 (W.D.Mo.1924). Since the language we now consider can only arise in a domestic relations context, the interpretation we here place o......
-
Leyerly v. United States, 3456.
...of intention, to be shown by the acts, conduct and declaration of the person alleging to stand in that relationship. Meisner v. United States, D. C., 295 F. 866; Miller v. United States, 8 Cir., 123 F.2d It will be presumed of course that the natural mother last bore the parental relationsh......
-
Niewiadomski v. United States
...also several district court opinions arising under similar provisions of the War Risk Insurance Act of World War 1. In Meisner v. United States, D.C.W.D.Mo., 295 F. 866, the Court held that the fact that the insured was an adult did not prevent the beneficiary from standing in loco parentis......