Melendez v. State, 68--1007

Decision Date03 February 1970
Docket NumberNo. 68--1007,68--1007
Citation231 So.2d 251
PartiesElias Gonzalez MELENDEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Hughlan Long, Public Defender, and Alan Becker, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Melvin Grossman, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C.J., and BARKDULL and HENDRY, JJ.

HENDRY, Judge.

The appellant was defendant below, having been charged with unlawful sale of narcotics and unlawful possession of narcotics. He entered a plea of not guilty, and the trial began at 10:30 A.M., October 15, 1968, in the Criminal Court of Record in and for Dade County. At that time, due to communication difficulties between the offices of defense counsel and the State Attorney, the appellant himself had not been notified to be in attendance at the court. A decision was made by the trial judge to proceed, and a recess was taken until 12:30 P.M., the same day, after which the following proceedings were had:

'THE COURT: Call the first six jurors.

'(Thereupon, the jurors were called and examined on their voir dire, but not yet sworn.)

'THE COURT: I just want to explain to the jury that Mr. Cohen was good enough to go ahead and select the jury without the defendant being here.

'I want to explain to you that the defendant was not aware that the trial was going to start today.

'In any event, you will be sitting as jurors in this case and we are now going to recess for lunch and I instruct you now, that you are not to discuss this case among yourselves, nor with anyone else.

'If, during the time we are at recess, if anyone approaches you to discuss this case at all, which I am sure they will not do, I tell every jury the same thing: if anybody approaches you or if you hear anybody discussing the case of Elias Gonzalez Melendez, please make this fact known to the Court when we reconvene.

'Anything else, any other instructions, either of you have?

'MR. COHEN: No sir.

'MR. GROSS: None.

'THE COURT: All right, everybody be back promptly at 1:30 P.M.

'(Thereupon, court recessed for lunch.)

'AFTERNOON SESSION

'(Whereupon, court reconvened at 1:30 P.M.) 'THE COURT: Let the record reflect the presence here now of Mr. Cohen and Mr. Melendez, the defendant.

'I want to ask a couple of questions. You are Elias Gonzalez Melendez?

'THE DEFENDANT: Yes, sir, I am.

'THE COURT: You were not here this morning and Mr. Cohen and the State went ahead and selected a jury. We have not sworn that jury in yet and I just want to know if you want to confer with Mr. Cohen after the jurors are brought into the courtroom, to see if there is anyone there that you do not want to serve on his jury.

'Have you discussed this with him earlier?

'MR. COHEN: No, not yet.

'THE COURT: I want to find out if there is anybody that he would want to excuse.

'MR. COHEN: All right.

'THE COURT: All right, bring the jury in.

'(Thereupon, the jury entered the courtroom.)

'MR. COHEN: We will accept the jury.

'THE COURT: Let me ask for the record, then you are relying on your counsel having picked the jury?

'THE DEFENDANT: Yes.

'THE COURT: And you are waiving any objection to the fact that it was selected while you were not here?

'Be sure that he understands. I want to be sure he is waiving any objection to the jury having been selected before he was here.

'THE DEFENDANT: Yes, sir.

'MR. COHEN: Yes, sir, he understands.

'THE COURT: And he hereby ratifies the selection of the jury?

'MR. COHEN: Yes, sir.

'THE COURT: All right, then let us proceed. The Clerk will swear the jury.

'(Thereupon, the jury was sworn to try the case.)'

It is the appellant's contention that the waiver of the objection appearing in the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • State v. Melendez
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Florida
    • February 3, 1971
    ...petition for writ of certiorari, we are asked to review the decision of the District Court of Appeal, Third District, Melendez v. State, 231 So.2d 251 (Fla.App.3rd, 1970), which reversed the conviction of defendant, respondent herein, on grounds he did not freely and voluntarily waive his r......
  • Melendez v. State, 68-1007
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • April 2, 1971
    ...PEARSON, C.J., and BARKDULL and HENDRY, JJ. ORDER ON MANDATE PER CURIAM. Whereas, the judgment of this court was entered on February 3, 1970 (231 So.2d 251) reversing the judgment and sentence of the Criminal Court of Record for Dade County, in the above styled cause; Whereas, on review of ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT