Melon v. State
| Decision Date | 25 August 1977 |
| Docket Number | No. 11560,11560 |
| Citation | 90 N.M. 787,568 P.2d 1233 |
| Parties | Arnold MELON, Petitioner, v. STATE of New Mexico, Respondent. |
| Court | New Mexico Supreme Court |
This matter coming on for consideration by the Court upon petition for writ of certiorari, and the Court having considered said petition and being sufficiently advised in the premises;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that petition for writ of certiorari be and the same is hereby denied. The Court agrees with the statement and conclusion of the Court of Appeals that in Eller v. State, 90 N.M. 552, 566 P.2d 101, this Court did not intend to abandon its prior decisions which hold that new issues may not be raised on appeal, regardless of whether they have been listed in the docketing statement.
This Court in Eller, supra, limited its application to the ") and to exceptions in extreme cases under the rules announced in Olguin v. State, 90 N.M. 303, 563 P.2d 97 (1977); Linam v. State, 90 N.M. 302, 563 P.2d 96 (1977); and Vigil v. State, 89 N.M. 601, 555 P.2d 901 (1976).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Record in Cause No. 3101 be and the same is hereby returned to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Parrillo
...nor had the opportunity to rule upon. Laguna Dev. Co. v. McAlester Fuel Co., 91 N.M. 244, 572 P.2d 1252 (1977); see Melon v. State, 90 N.M. 787, 586 P.2d 1233 (1977). We note the first amendment weakness of subsection C of § 30-3-1, N.M.S.A.1978, sua sponte, merely to alert the Legislature ......
-
Espanola Housing Authority v. Atencio
... ... because it is inconsistent with § 23-1-8, N.M.S.A.1953, which provides a three-year limitation period for tort actions against the county or state. Section 23-1-23 has previously been challenged as special legislation, but in Hoover v. City of Albuquerque, 58 N.M. 250, 270 P.2d 386 (1954) this ... ...