Menge v. City of Manchester
Decision Date | 28 September 1973 |
Docket Number | No. 6574,6574 |
Citation | 113 N.H. 533,311 A.2d 116 |
Parties | John A. MENGE v. CITY OF MANCHESTER et al. |
Court | New Hampshire Supreme Court |
Sulloway, Hollis, Godfrey & Soden and Michael R. Callahan, Concord, for plaintiff.
J. Francis Roche, City Solicitor, for defendants.
This is a petition for injunctive relief under RSA ch. 91-A(Supp.1972)'right to know law' against the defendants, city of Manchester, and John F. McGranahan, William W. Lynch, and Paul R. Martineau, members of the Manchester Board of Assessors.Trial by the Court, a Flynn, J., who made findings of facts, rulings of law and granted plaintiff the relief sought.Defendants' exceptions were reserved and transferred by the trial court.
The trial court made the following findings of fact which are not disputed.
'The plaintiff, a professor of economics at Dartmouth College, is conducting through the college's Public Affairs Center a tax study which is expected to be concluded by the middle of this December.The plaintiff seeks to have the defendants release to him for this study a computerized tape of certain field record cards compiled by the city of Manchester for use in arriving at its real estate tax assessments.
The plaintiff claims that the information on this tape is vital for his study and that he is entitled to have access to it as a public record under RSA 91-A:4.The defendants maintain that the information contained on this tape is not a public record, but, even if it were, it is exempt from disclosure under RSA 91-A:5 subd. IV in that the tape contains 'confidential, commercial or financial information . . . whose disclosure would constitute invasion of privacy.'
Office.Most of the data in these field record cards was transferred to a property tax information sheet and was caused by the Assessors to be put on a computerized tape by the Merchants Bank, of Manchester.It cost the city of Manchester the sum of $12,500.00 to put this data on a tape.The annual upkeep cost for this tape amounts to $3500.00.
Office for the purpose of examining same.Mr. May was advised by the defendant, John F. McGranahan, Chairman of the Board of Assessors, that these records were put on tape by the Merchants Bank and were at the Bank.Mr. May then approached Francis X. McCarthy, Manager of Data Processing at the Merchants Bank, about obtaining this tape.Mr. McCarthy told Mr. May that he could reproduce the original tape but that he would first have to obtain permission from the Board of Assessors.Having a little time on his hands, Mr. McCarthy made a duplicate of the original tape pending clearance from the Board of Assessors.Before giving clearance, Mr. McGranahan requested a letter from the plaintiff asking for this information.Such a letter was sent by the plaintiff to Mr. McGranahan on July 17, 1972.On August 1, 1972, Mr. McGranahan wrote to the plaintiff indicating that this information would not be available but that he could look at the real estate warrant.
Office.If the tape were made available, the data could be quickly fed into a computer at Dartmouth College, and nobody in the Assessors' Office would be disturbed.Providing the tape to the plaintiff would not endanger the safety of the records or interfere with the duties of the Assessors who have the custody of the original field cards.
RSA 91-A:4 (Supp.1972) provides that every citizen has the...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Kestenbaum v. Michigan State University
...willingness "to provide the identical information in the form of a computer printout or microfiche."); Menge v. City of Manchester, 113 N.H. 533, 311 A.2d 116 (1973) (Plaintiff held entitled to computerized tape indicating ownership, description, and value of all real property within the ci......
-
Higg-A-Rella, Inc. v. County of Essex
...563, discounted privacy concerns and required provision of a computer copy of a county tax-assessment roll. In Menge v. City of Manchester, 113 N.H. 533, 311 A.2d 116, 119 (1973), which also involved a computerized property tax roll, the New Hampshire Supreme Court came to substantially the......
-
U.S. v. Mitchell
...(1948).That the tapes are not writings does not take them outside the common law right to inspect. See, e. g., Menge v. City of Manchester, 113 N.H. 533, 311 A.2d 116 (1973) (right to copy magnetic computer tape); Oritz v. Jaramillo, 82 N.M. 445, 483 P.2d 500 (1971) (same); cf. 28 U.S.C. § ......
-
Union Leader Corp. v. Town of Salem
...to "confidential" and "financial information." See Chambers v. Gregg, 135 N.H. 478, 481, 606 A.2d 811 (1992) ; Menge v. Manchester, 113 N.H. 533, 537-38, 311 A.2d 116 (1973) ; Mans v. Lebanon School Bd., 112 N.H. 160, 162-64, 290 A.2d 866 (1972).We first adopted the balancing test in Mans. ......