Menon v. Dux

Decision Date09 June 2004
Citation269 Conn. 913,852 A.2d 743
CourtConnecticut Supreme Court
PartiesHEMA MENON v. ANN DUX.

The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 81 Conn. App. 167 (AC 23563), is denied.

Hema Menon, pro se, in support of the petition.

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • State v. Dews
    • United States
    • Appellate Court of Connecticut
    • January 25, 2005
    ......Furthermore, even if the error is so apparent and review is afforded, the defendant cannot prevail on the basis of an error that lacks constitutional dimension unless he demonstrates that it likely affected the result of the trial." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Menon v. Dux, 81 Conn.App. 167, 172, 838 A.2d 1038, cert. denied, 269 Conn. 913, 852 A.2d 743 (2004) . .         The defendant claims that the court, sua sponte, should have stricken the shower testimony and offered a limiting instruction as to its use. The defendant did not object to this ......
  • Estate of Haburey v. Town of Winchester
    • United States
    • Appellate Court of Connecticut
    • May 23, 2014
    ...might reasonably have reached its conclusion.” (Emphasis in original.) Menon v. Dux, 81 Conn.App. 167, 174, 838 A.2d 1038, cert. denied, 269 Conn. 913, 852 A.2d 743, cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1003, 125 S.Ct. 623, 160 L.Ed.2d 463 (2004). The defendants attempt to employ an exacting standard, co......
  • Perugini v. Giuliano
    • United States
    • Appellate Court of Connecticut
    • March 25, 2014
    ......Furthermore, having expressly agreed to the court's decision, the plaintiff cannot now seek to attack the order on appeal. See Menon v. Dux, 81 Conn.App. 167, 170–71, 838 A.2d 1038 (claim unpreserved where appealing party expressly acquiesced to court's evidentiary ruling at trial), cert. denied, 269 Conn. 913, 852 A.2d 743, cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1003, 125 S.Ct. 623, 160 L.Ed.2d 463 (2004). Accordingly, we decline to review ......
  • In re Clark
    • United States
    • Appellate Court of Connecticut
    • May 27, 2014
    ......See, e.g., Perugini v. Giuliano, 148 Conn.App. 861, 870–71, 89 A.3d 358 (2014) (court declines to review unpreserved claim that trial court erred in suspending deposition when at trial appellant agreed to terms of court's order regarding suspension); Menon v. Dux, 81 Conn.App. 167, 170–71, 838 A.2d 1038 (claim unpreserved where appealing party expressly acquiesced in court's evidentiary ruling at trial), cert. denied, 269 Conn. 913, 852 A.2d 743, cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1003, 125 S.Ct. 623, 160 L.Ed.2d 463 (2004). Accordingly, we decline to review ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT