Meredith v. Arden

Decision Date10 November 1976
Docket NumberNo. 8421,8421
Citation555 P.2d 1241,92 Nev. 620
PartiesThomas K. MEREDITH and Rose N. Meredith, Appellants, v. Virgie L. Spekker ARDEN and John Arden et al., Respondents.
CourtNevada Supreme Court
OPINION

PER CURIAM:

This action was dismissed for failure to prosecute within five years. NRCP 41(e). The complaint was filed August 18, 1965. Nine and three-quarters years elapsed without the action coming to trial. Now appellant claims the trial court abused its discretion in granting the motion to dismiss.

This court holds once again that a period of delay between the filing of the complaint and trial which exceeds five years mandates dismissal. Under NRCP 41(e) dismissal is required without regard to any exercise of discretion on the part of the trial judge. In the absence of a written stipulation extending the time for trial, the trial court properly granted the motion. Monroe, Ltd. v. Central Telephone Co., 91 Nev. 450, 538 P.2d 152 (1975); Trail v. Faretto, 91 Nev. 401, 536 P.2d 1026 (1975); Lighthouse v. Great W. Land and Cattle, 88 Nev. 55, 493 P.2d 296 (1972); Lindauer v. Allen, 85 Nev. 430, 456 P.2d 851 (1969).

Affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Massey v. Sunrise Hosp.
    • United States
    • Nevada Supreme Court
    • 4 d4 Setembro d4 1986
    ...to trial within five years of commencement are dismissed pursuant to motion. Such action is mandatory. E.g., Meredith v. Arden, 92 Nev. 620, 621, 555 P.2d 1241, 1242 (1976). The "three-year" provision, however, extends the "five-year" rule when an appeal is taken. Such an extension is neces......
  • Johnson v. Harber
    • United States
    • Nevada Supreme Court
    • 9 d3 Agosto d3 1978
    ...pursuant to NRCP 41(e) for failure to bring to trial a claim within five years of filing the complaint is mandatory. Meredith v. Arden, 92 Nev. 620, 555 P.2d 1241 (1976); Monroe, Ltd. v. Central Telephone Co., 91 Nev. 450, 538 P.2d 152 (1975); Trail v. Faretto, 91 Nev. 401, 536 P.2d 1026 (1......
  • Rudder v. Union Pac. R. Co., 8771
    • United States
    • Nevada Supreme Court
    • 17 d4 Fevereiro d4 1977
    ...We disagree. We have frequently, and consistently, considered and rejected similar arguments. See, for example, Meredith v. Arden, 92 Nev. 620, 555 P.2d 1241 (1976), and cases cited Affirmed. ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT