Merrill v. Floyd
Decision Date | 30 June 1892 |
Docket Number | 23. |
Citation | 50 F. 849 |
Parties | MERRILL v. FLOYD. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — First Circuit |
William A. Macleod and Robert D. Trash, for plaintiff in error.
Benjamin F. Butler and T. Henry Pearse, for defendant in error.
Before GRAY, Circuit Justice, and PUTNAM and NELSON, Circuit Judges.
The original action was brought on September 6, 1889, by Floyd against Merrill, for fraudulent representations as to the condition of a corporation in which both parties owned shares, whereby the defendant induced the plaintiff to sell his shares to the defendant for much less than their value. The answer denied all the allegations of the declaration. On February 2, 1892, the counsel for both parties signed and filed a stipulation in writing in these words:
'It is agreed by counsel for plaintiff and defendant in the above-entitled case that the same be marked, 'Jury waived' tentatively.'
The case was thereupon tried by ALDRICH, J., who, on March 10th filed the following 'findings of fact and verdict:'
On April 16, the judge denied a motion 'The defendant thereupon tendered a bill of exceptions to the findings and rulings at the trial, upon the ground that there was no evidence to support the findings of fact, as well as upon the ground that upon those findings of fact the defendant was not liable; and this bill of exceptions was allowed and filed. On the same day, a motion by the plaintiff that 'judgment be entered on the verdict in this cause non obstante the exceptions' was granted and judgment was entered for the plaintiff for the sum of $3,458 and costs. On April 26th the defendant sued out this writ of error. The defendant in error has now moved to dismiss the writ of error, because no exceptions were taken at the trial, but...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Rush v. Newman
... ... Dustin, 112 U.S. 604, ... 608, 5 S.Ct. 296; and 'jury waived tentatively,' and ... 'finding of facts and verdict,'--Merrill v ... Floyd, 2 C. C. A. 58, 50 F. 849. In the absence of a ... statute authorizing it, the finding of issues of fact by the ... court is not a ... ...
-
United States v. Carr, 366.
... ... Bond v. Dustin, supra; Andes v. Slauson, ... 130 U.S. 435, 438, 9 Sup.Ct. 573; Railway Co. v. Henson, ... 7 C.C.A. 349, 58 F. 531; Merrill v. Floyd, 2 ... C.C.A. 58, 50 F. 849; Walker v. Miller, 8 ... C.C.A. 331, 59 F. 869 ... It is ... apparent from the judgment entry that ... ...
-
Murphy v. Milford, A. & W. St. Ry. Co.
...28, 49 L.Ed. 219, decided on November 28, 1904. Such being the fact, the practice has been fully settled in this circuit in Merrill v. Floyd, 50 F. 849, 2 C.C.A. 58, decided on June 30, 1892, in Smith v. Weeks, 53 758, 3 C.C.A. 644, decided on January 10, 1893, and in Greene v. United Shoe ......
- Merrill v. Floyd