Merrit Martin v. William Waddell
Decision Date | 01 January 1842 |
Citation | 10 L.Ed. 997,16 Pet. 367,41 U.S. 367 |
Parties | MERRIT MARTIN and others, Plaintiffs in error, v. The Lessee of WILLIAM C. WADDELL, Defendant in error |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
[Syllabus from pages 367-369 intentionally omitted] ERROR to the Circuit Court of New Jersey. The defendant in error, the lessee of William C. H. Waddell, instituted, to April term 1835, in the circuit court of the United States for the district of New Jersey, an action of ejectment, against Merrit Martin and others, for the recovery of certain land covered with water, situated in the Raritan bay, below high-water mark, in the state of New Jersey. The defendants appeared to the suit; and at April term 1837, the cause was tried by a jury, who found a special verdict, on which judgment was afterwards entered for the plaintiff; from which judgment, the defendants prosecuted this writ of error.
The case was argued by Wall and Wood, for the plaintiffs in error; and by Ogden and Wright, for the defendant.
The special verdict found, that on the 12th day of March 1664, certain letters-patent, duly executed, were granted by Charles II., then King of England, to James, Duke of York; and set forth the letters-patent at large. The letters-patent stated, that the king——
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Provo City v. Jacobsen
... ... true line of ordinary high-water mark." Martin ... v. Busch, 93 Fla. 535, 112 So. 274, 283 ... "When ... [111 ... Utah 60] Martin v. Waddell, 41 U.S. 367, 16 ... Pet. 367, 10 L.Ed. 997; Pollard's Heirs v ... ...
-
Sterling v. Jackson
... ... PEALER, Judge ... Trespass, ... q. c., by William C. Sterling against Charles A ... Jackson, for breaking and entering ... waters. Martin v. Waddell, 16 Pet ... 367; Smith v. Maryland, 18 How ... ...
-
Tangier Sound Watermen's Assoc. v. Douglas
...that as it is the owner of the subaqueous bottomlands to the navigable waters within its jurisdiction, Martin v. Waddell's Lessee, 41 U.S. (16 Pet.) 367, 410, 10 L.Ed. 997 (1842); McCready v. Virginia, 94 U.S. 391, 394, 24 L.Ed. 248 (1876); State Land Board v. Corvallis Sand & Gravel Co., 4......
-
Annie Kean v. Calumet Canal Improvement Company
...powers as the original states. A list of the cases in which this doctrine is stated is appended in the margin. Martin v. Waddell (1842) 16 Pet. 367, 410, 10 L. ed. 997, 1012; Pollard v. Hagan (1845) 3 How. 213, 11 L. ed. 566; Goodtitle ex dem. Pollard v. Kibbe (1850) 9 How. 471, 13 L. ed. 2......
-
Navigable Waters
...and its exemption of water transfers and diversions from §402, see infra Chapter 1, Section III.A.3. 17. Martin v. Waddell’s Lessee, 41 U.S. 367, 407-14 (1842), traces this history back to the Magna Carta. 18. Pollard v. Hagen, 44 U.S. 212 (1843). he U.S. Constitution did not grant the shor......
-
CHAPTER 1 THE OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF LANDS ACT TURNS FIFTY -- A Premature Look at the First Half-Century of the OCSLA
...Pollard inland-water rule to the 3 mile ocean belt. See Pollard's Lessee v. Hagan, 3 How. 212 (1845); see also Martin v. Waddell's Lease, 16 Pet. 367,410 (1842). United States v. California, 381 U.S. 139 (1965) • Action by the United States against California, begun in 1945, to determine do......
-
The Local Public Trust Doctrine
...alongside judicial decisions interpreting MERA.”) (emphasis in original). 66. Ill. Cent. , 146 U.S. 387. 67. Martin v. Waddell’s Lessee, 41 U.S. 367 (1842). 2021] THE LOCAL PUBLIC TRUST DOCTRINE 11 Shively v. Bowlby . 68 These cases all recognize and employ the public trust doctrine. Some h......
-
Three cases/four tales: commons, capture, the public trust, and property in land.
...Fish Co., 570 P.2d 401 (Or. App. 1977); and Washington v. Mach, 594 P.2d 1361 (Wash. cr. App. 1979). (220) See, e.g., Martin v. Waddell, 41 U.S. 367, 411 (1842) (holding that in granting partially submerged land to the Duke of York, the King was powerless to abbrogate the common law right t......