Metro. Life Ins. Co. v. Lodzinski
Decision Date | 17 October 1938 |
Docket Number | No. 215.,215. |
Citation | 124 N.J.Eq. 357,1 A.2d 859 |
Parties | METROPOLITAN LIFE INS. CO. v. LODZINSKI et al. |
Court | New Jersey Supreme Court |
Appeal from Court of Chancery.
Suit by the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company against Magdalena Lodzinski and others to cancel life policies by reason of fraud in the procurement thereof. From a decree of the Court of Chancery, 1 A. 2d 856, striking the bill to cancel one life policy, the complainant appeals.
Decree reversed to the end that Court of Chancery enter decree canceling policy.
McCarter & English and Conover English, all of Newark, for appellant.
Nathan Reibel, of Elizabeth, for respondent Magdalena Lodzinski.
The complainant filed a bill in chancery to cancel two policies of life insurance by reason of fraud in the procurement thereof. The first policy was issued February 21, 1933, and the second policy was actually issued December 24, 1934. As to the first policy, the learned Vice Chancellor who heard the case dismissed the bill so far as it related to that policy for the reason that the action was not commenced in time. It was held in this court on appeal that the action was timely. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Lodzinski, 122 N.J.Eq. 404, 194 A. 79, and we also affirmed the Vice Chancellor in his conclusion that the second policy was procured by fraud, and was properly cancelled. The court of Chancery in the retrial of the action, so far as it related to the voidability of the first policy for fraud, struck the bill. It quite properly reviewed the facts and law in the following manner: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ettelson v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.
...17 A. 119. See, also, Kozlowski v. Pavonia Fire Ins. Co., Err. & App., 116 N.J.L. 194, 183 A. 154. 13 Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Lodzinski, Err. & App., 124 N.J.Eq. 357, 1 A.2d 859; Prudential Ins. Co. v. Cafiero, 126 N.J.Eq. 33, 7 A.2d 882; ?tna Life Ins. Co. v. Sussman, 111 N.J.Eq. 358......
-
Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Md. v. Hudson United Bank
...114 A.2d 857; Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Tarnowski, 130 N.J.Eq. 1, 3, 20 A.2d 421 (E. & A.1941); Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Lodzinski, 124 N.J.Eq. 357, 359, 1 A.2d 859 (E.& A.1938); Russ v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 112 N.J. Super. 265, 274, 270 A.2d 759 (Law Div. 1970); Formosa v. ......
-
Russ v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.
...as legal fraud, even after the death of the insured. Among the many cases in point so holding are Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Lodzinski, 124 N.J.Eq. 357 1 A.2d 859 (E. & A.1938); Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Tarnowski, 130 N.J.Eq. 1, 20 A.2d 421 (E. & A.1941); Metropolitan Life......
-
Massachusetts Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Manzo
...857 (1955); Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Tarnowski, 130 N.J.Eq. 1, 3, 20 A.2d 421 (E. & A.1941); Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Lodzinski, 124 N.J.Eq. 357, 359, 1 A.2d 859 (E. & A.1938). Viewed in isolation, this rule may sometimes yield a seemingly harsh result. The rule must be considered......