Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Buckley

Decision Date14 December 1967
Docket NumberCiv. A. No. 3993.
PartiesMETROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE CO., Plaintiff, v. Onedia BUCKLEY et al., Defendants.
CourtU.S. District Court — Southern District of Mississippi

W. Calvin Wells, Jr., Jack W. Brand, Wells, Thomas & Wells, Jackson, Miss., for plaintiff.

Jackson H. Young, Jackson, Miss., J. A. White, Durant, Miss., Bernard W. N. Chill, Jackson, Miss., for defendants.

OPINION OF THE COURT

DAN M. RUSSELL, Jr., District Judge.

Metropolitan Life Insurance Company filed its bill of interpleader pursuant to 28 U.S.C., Sections 1335, 1397, and 2361, setting forth that it had received conflicting claims to the proceeds of a $7,000.00 insurance policy issued to one Joe W. Buckley, a U. S. Post Office employee in Chicago, Illinois, pursuant to the Federal Employee's Group Life Insurance Act of 1954, 5 U.S.C., Section 2091 et seq. The group certificate, a part of Group Policy No. 17,000-G, provides, in the event no beneficiary is named, for the proceeds to be distributed as follows:

1. To the widow or widower.
2. To the child or children in equal shares, with the share of any deceased child distributed among the descendants of that child.
3. To parents in equal shares or the entire amount to the surviving parent.
4. The duly appointed Executor or Administrator of deceased's estate.
5. The next-of-kin under the laws of the state of deceased's domicile.

Plaintiff set forth the conflicting claims of Onedia Buckley, a resident of Holmes County, Mississippi, as Administratrix of the Estate of Joe W. Buckley, deceased, having been appointed by the Chancery Court of Holmes County; of Amanda Buckley, a resident of Chicago, as grandmother of the deceased; and of Claudette Bostic, a resident of Chicago, as mother and next friend of Brenda Bostic, Stephanie Bostic, and Deborah Bostic, alleged minor children of the deceased. The proceeds of the policy were paid into the registry of the Court, and Metropolitan was discharged of any further obligation herein, upon payment to it of $300.00 in attorney fees and the sum of $79.76 in costs, the Court retaining jurisdiction to adjudicate the claims.

The cause was submitted to the Court on a stipulation, admission of documents, the testimony of Claudette Bostic, and on briefs.

By stipulation, it was agreed, and the Court so finds, that Joe W. Buckley, died, intestate, on April 7, 1966, in Chicago, Illinois; that Buckley was single at the time of his death and had never married; that Onedia Buckley is the stepmother of deceased, her children are half-brothers and half-sisters to the decedent, and that she duly qualified as Administratrix of decedent's estate in Cause No. 11032, pending in the Chancery Court of Holmes County, Mississippi; that Amanda Buckley is the paternal grandmother of the deceased; that Claudette Bostic is the natural mother of Brenda Bostic, Stephanie Bostic and Deborah Bostic, having never been married to the deceased; that Joe W. Buckley was the child of Joseph Buckley and Essie Whitfield, who had a common law marriage at a time when such was recognized in Mississippi; and that deceased died without having designated a beneficiary.

In an affidavit of Onedia Buckley, claimant adverse to Claudette Bostic, affiant stated that on February 8, 1952, in Durant, Mississippi, she married deceased's father, Joe Willie Buckley, after his first wife died. At that time and for many years following the death of his mother, deceased lived with his grandmother, Amanda Buckley, another claimant, in Chicago, but would occasionally visit in Mississippi. The fact that deceased's mother died in 1938, and, that the deceased thereafter went to live with his grandmother, Amanda Buckley, in Chicago, and attended school there, is substantiated by another affidavit of a disinterested person on file.

Other documents, in addition to the testimony of Claudette Bostic, show that Claudette Bostic separated from her husband, Geraldine Bostic, on or about 1958. There was no divorce. Thereafter Claudette Bostic became the mother of Brenda, Stephanie and Deborah in Chicago. Claudette Bostic testified that following her separation from Geraldine Bostic, she lived with Joe W. Buckley throughout the birth and early years of these three minors. She offered in evidence an acknowledgement of paternity of Brenda, born September 16, 1962, sworn to by Joe W. Buckley on September 27, 1962, a similar acknowledgement of paternity of Stephanie, born August 28, 1963, sworn to by Joe W. Buckley on August 14, 1964, and a birth certificate from Cook County, Illinois, of the birth of Deborah Buckley, born April 15, 1965, and on which the name of the father is shown as Joe Willie Buckley, post office clerk in Chicago. Claudette Bostic testified that the deceased claimed these three children as dependents for income tax purposes, and that she had submitted the paternity acknowledgements to the Cook County Department of Public Aid for the purpose of receiving assistance, but that she received none as the deceased supported said children.

Claudette Bostic admitted the children are illegitimate, and it may be said that her testimony is otherwise self-serving. However, from...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • State v. Clawges
    • United States
    • West Virginia Supreme Court
    • June 5, 2013
  • Green v. Green, 10003.
    • United States
    • D.C. Court of Appeals
    • October 27, 1976
    ...434 S.W.2d 7 (Mo.App.1968). 8. See Brantley v. Skeens, 105 U.S.App.D.C. 246, 266 F.2d 447 (1959). See also Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Buckley, 278 F.Supp. 334 (S.D.Miss.1967). 9. See Patton v. Lee, 394 F.Supp. 501 (W.D. Ky.1975); Butcher v. Pollard, 32 Ohio App. 2d 1, 288 N.E.2d 204 (197......
  • Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. Willis
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • November 30, 1970
    ...3 Cir., 368 F.2d 791, cert. denied Thompson v. Thompson, 388 U.S. 914, 87 S.Ct. 2127, 18 L.Ed.2d 1355; Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Buckley, D.C., 278 F.Supp. 334. In United States v. Philippine National Bank, 110 U.S.App.D.C. 250, 292 F.2d 743, 744, we find the following: 'The provis......
  • Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. Dulek
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Nebraska
    • December 19, 1980
    ...368 F.2d 791, 794 (3d Cir. 1966); Manning v. Prudential Insurance Company, supra, 330 F.Supp. at 1200; Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Buckley, 278 F.Supp. 334, 337 (S.D.Miss.1967). Cf. Copple v. Bowlin, supra, 172 Neb. at 374-75, 110 N.W.2d at 122 (Inheritance law limiting rights of illegit......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT