Metzel v. Robinson
| Decision Date | 30 April 1958 |
| Parties | Anna Euela METZEL, Appellant, v. Willie Mae ROBINSON and Louis B. Robinson, Appellees. |
| Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Carey & Papy and Wesley G. Carey, Miami, for appellant.
Nichols, Gaither, Green, Frates & Beckham and Sam Daniels, Miami, for appellees.
This is an appeal by defendant from final judgment of the circuit court entered consequent upon a verdict for the plaintiffs.
Plaintiffs below, husband and wife, recovered judgment for injuries to the wife sustained in an automobile accident. The automobile which caused the injuries was driven by one Bryant, who was alone in the car when the accident occurred. Record title to the car was in the name of appellant, Anna Metzel, who is Bryant's aunt.
Appellant contends that she was not the actual owner of the car, and since she had nothing to do with the accident the judgment should be reversed.
Out of the presence of the jury, appellant tendered evidence that Bryant, at the age of 18, lived with appellant and her husband in Washington, D. C., where he was employed. Bryant wanted to buy an automobile but the seller objected to a person of his tender years signing the finance papers. Appellant thereupon agreed to sign the finance papers for him, did so, and took title to the automobile in her name. Bryant kept up the payments, and appellant had nothing further to do with the car. While visiting his mother in Miami, Bryant, driving the car in question was involved in the accident. It further appeared, however, that appellant had insured the car in her name to comply with the Automobile Assigned Risk Plan of the State of Virginia, and had stated in the insurance application that her nephew would be a driver of the car. Although the matter of transferring title to the car from appellant to her nephew had been discussed, no action toward this end had been taken.
The trial judge ruled that appellant was the owner of the automobile as a matter of law and she was not permitted to prove that the true ownership was in Bryant.
Appellant relies mainly upon Palmer v. R. S. Evans, Jacksonville, Inc., Fla., 81 So.2d 635 and 69 So.2d 342; Ragg v. Hurd, Fla., 60 So.2d 673, and related cases. These cases concern situations where a sale of the automobile has been consummated or is in progress. A more recent case in accord is McAfee v. Killingsworth, Fla., 98 So.2d 738, opinion filed November 22, 1957. In the case before us, however, admittedly no action was taken to divest appellant of her title to the car. She was still in a position to exert some dominion and control over the vehicle. Certainly both appellant and her nephew had a species of ownership and either or both of them could have been held liable for the accident.
...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Green v. American Tobacco Company
...of Civil Procedure. 3 Sections 768.01, 768.01, Florida Statutes 1959. 4 Montgomery v. Stary, Fla.1955, 84 So. 2d 34, 39; Metzel v. Robinson, Fla.1958, 102 So.2d 385, 386; see Great American Indemnity Co. v. Holloway, 5 Cir., 1960, 286 F.2d 106, 108-109. 5 Henkel v. Chicago, St. P., M. & O. ......
-
J.R. Brooks & Son, Inc. v. Quiroz
...beneficial ownership and its concomitant right to control the use of the truck was, at best, 2 a question for the jury. Metzel v. Robinson, 102 So.2d 385 (Fla.1958); Marshall v. Gawel, 696 So.2d 937 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997); American Nat'l. Bank of Jacksonville v. Riser, 212 So.2d 343 (Fla. 1st D......
-
Bowen v. Taylor–Christensen
...both of these points—Appellee's subjective intent and his non-use—is amply grounded in our high court's decision in Metzel v. Robinson, 102 So.2d 385 (Fla.1958). Metzel stands for three legal propositions all of which have direct bearing here: (1) as a matter of law, if a person causes or p......
-
Ray v. Earl
...principal-agent chain from owner to bailee to permittee remains intact for the purposes of vicarious liability. See also, Metzel v. Robinson, 102 So.2d 385 (Fla.1958); Re-Mark Chemical Co. v. Ross, 101 So.2d 163 (3d D.C.A.Fla.1958). Similarly, the chain of permission, express and implied, f......