Meurer v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
| Decision Date | 06 April 1955 |
| Docket Number | Docket 23163.,No. 135,135 |
| Citation | 221 F.2d 223,47 AFTR 417 |
| Parties | Mae F. MEURER, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit |
Emanuel A. Stern, New York City, for petitioner.
Carolyn R. Just, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen. (H. Brian Holland, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Ellis N. Slack and Lee A. Jackson, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., on the brief), for respondent.
Before CLARK, Chief Judge, FRANK, Circuit Judge, and GALSTON, District Judge.
This is a taxpayer's appeal from disallowance of a claimed deduction for $5,923.67 for property maintenance expenses under either I.R.C. §§ 23(e) (2) or 23(c) (1), 26 U.S.C. § 23(c) (1), (e) (2). Petitioner is executrix under the will of her mother, who died in 1937. The will left to the taxpayer and her two sisters all of the residual estate in trust, as well as a specific legacy of the proceeds of Belle Terre, the family summer residence on Long Island. The taxpayer as executrix was instructed to sell Belle Terre as soon as practicable, but without the loss incident to a forced sale. Pending sale the estate was made responsible for costs of maintenance, and the taxpayer was entitled to use the property rent free. In November, 1938, the sisters renounced their legacy shares in Belle Terre; several months later in 1939 they entered into the option agreement for the purchase of Belle Terre which is the basis of taxpayer's claim here. In this agreement the sisters, including the taxpayer, offered to buy Belle Terre or the proceeds of its sale from her as executrix for $48,000, obligating themselves to pay the cost of its upkeep so long as the option should remain open. The option remained open until 1944 when it was terminated by one of the sisters, after due notice according to its terms.
Petitioner now claims that her share of the upkeep expenditures from 1939 to the termination of the option in 1944 is deductible on her personal income tax return for 1944 either in toto as a loss incident to a transaction entered into for profit, under I.R.C. § 23(e) (2), or in part as payment of taxes, under I.R.C. § 23(c) (1). The Tax Court held that these were merely personal expenses for which no deduction is authorized by the Internal Revenue Code. 18 T.C. 530, modified in other respects, 20 T.C. 614.
We have recently reiterated the standard for loss deduction under I.R.C. § 23(e) (2). Ewing v. C.I.R., 2 Cir., 213 F.2d 438. We there said that the taxpayer must demonstrate that her motive for entering into the transaction was primarily profit. The Tax Court found that this was not the case here, and we are inclined to agree, if only on the ground of failure of proof. For it is hard to understand any motive whatsoever for the peculiar intrafamilial arrangement before us. The proffered explanation of protecting...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Murphy v. Commissioner
...(2d Cir. 1960), affg. in part, revg. in part [Dec. 23,240] 31 T.C. 346 (1958); Meurer v. Commissioner [55-1 USTC ¶ 9343], 221 F.2d 223, 224 (2d Cir. 1955).8 And petitioners have not proved that their primary objective was to make a profit. We turn now to the question whether petitioners' pr......
-
Austin v. CIR
...v. Commissioner, 277 F.2d 576, 578-579 (2d Cir. 1960); Ewing v. Commissioner, 213 F.2d 438, 439-440 (2d Cir. 1954); Meurer v. Commissioner, 221 F.2d 223 (2d Cir. 1955). Cf. Gevirtz v. Commissioner, 123 F.2d 707 (2d Cir. However petitioners also assert that the Tax Court's finding as to moti......
-
Cottrell v. Commissioner, Docket No. 667-69.
...has failed to prove that he suffered a deductible loss. Mae F. Meurer Dec. 19,035, 18 T. C. 530 (1952), affd. 55-1 USTC ¶ 9343 221 F. 2d 223 (C. A. 2, 1955). Secondly, petitioner contends that section 165(c) violates the due process clause of the fifth amendment of the Constitution. We disa......
-
Foehl v. Commissioner, Docket No. 82022.
...rely on Leland Hazard Dec. 15,273, 7 T. C. 372 (1946); Mae F. Meurer Dec. 19,742, 20 T. C. 614 (1953), affd. 55-1 USTC ¶ 9343 221 F. 2d 223 (C. A. 2, 1955); Fackler v. Commissioner 43-1 USTC ¶ 9270, 133 F. 2d 509 (C. A. 6, 1943), affirming Dec. 12,169 45 B. T. A. 708; and Gilford v. Commiss......