Meyer v. Barnes, 600

Decision Date06 February 1989
Docket NumberNo. 88-1531,No. 600,600,88-1531
Citation867 F.2d 464
Parties130 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2732, 110 Lab.Cas. P 10,930 Eugene MEYER, Thomas C. Welch, Thomas P. Knox, Theodore N. Welch, John C. Fisher, James T. Schmidt and Eugene C. Lemke, Appellants, v. Timothy D. BARNES, Ernest Kon, Robert Robertson, James Mason, individually, and as representatives, officers and agents, of the Highway, City and Air Freight Drivers, Dockmen & Helpers, Local Union, a Labor Union affiliated with the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America, and Jackie Presser and Weldon Mathis, individually and as representatives, officers and agents of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers, Appellees.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit

Stephen H. Gilmore, St. Louis, Mo., for appellants.

Cary Hammond, St. Louis, Mo., for appellees.

Before FAGG and WOLLMAN, Circuit Judges, and WOODS *, District Judge.

WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge.

Appellants, former officers and business representatives of Highway, City and Air Freight Drivers, Dockmen and Helpers Local Union No. 600, appeal the district court's 1 grant of summary judgment to present officers of Local 600 and to officers of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America (IBT). We affirm.

On October 3, 1974, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri rendered a judgment for $5,796,341.18 against Local 600 and in favor of The Motor Carriers Council of St. Louis, Inc. As a result, Local 600 filed a voluntary petition in bankruptcy in the United States Bankruptcy Court on September 24, 1976.

On December 8, 1976, appellants filed proofs of claims in the bankruptcy proceeding. They claimed, among other things, severance pay computed on the basis of one month's salary for each year of employment with Local 600. They based these claims on a resolution adopted by the Local 600 executive board on February 13, 1974:

Any full-time officer or business representative who shall die or terminate his employment for any reason, other than discharge for cause, or shall vacate an elected office for any reason, shall receive severance pay in an amount equal to one month's pay for each full year of service, either as an officer or business representative, with a maximum of fifteen (15) months pay. Severance pay shall be computed at the rate of compensation of the officer or business representative at the time of his death, termination or vacation of office.

In the fall of 1979, Local 600 and the Motor Carriers Council entered into a "Memorandum of Proposed Agreement." This agreement formed the basis of a comprehensive settlement concerning the creditors in bankruptcy. On October 31, 1979, the court authorized the trustee in bankruptcy to enter into the agreement.

As part of the comprehensive settlement, the trustee stipulated with Local 600 to obtain the written waivers of its officers and business representatives who had filed claims in the bankruptcy proceeding. Accordingly, on March 31, 1980, appellants waived their claims to severance pay. On August 22, 1980, the bankruptcy court granted Local 600 a general discharge in bankruptcy and released it from all dischargeable debts. Because the court had earlier noted that the Motor Carriers Council judgment was nondischargeable, that judgment survived.

On December 8, 1980, appellants Theodore Welch, Fisher, and Schmidt were defeated at the Local 600 election of officers. The new president, under the 1974 Local 600 constitution and bylaws, could appoint and remove all business agents and organizers, subject to the approval of the executive board. After the new president took office, he removed appellants Meyer, Lemke, Knox, and Thomas Welch.

During the time between the election of officers on December 8, 1980, and the beginning of the newly-elected officials' term on January 1, 1981, appellants Theodore Welch, Fisher, Schmidt, and Knox comprised a majority of the seven-member executive board. On December 19, 1980, the executive board approved the following resolution:

Be it resolved that the Officers and Business Representatives of Teamsters Local 600 be entitled to severance pay in the amount as set forth per Executive Board Meeting of February 13, 1974, a copy of said minutes and resolution being attached here to and incorporated herein;

And be it further resolved that in the event Local 600 disputes the claims for severance pay, and it is determined that Local 600 is liable, then any and all attorneys' fees incurred by officers and/or business representatives in obtaining said severance pay shall be assessed against Local 600.

On December 31, 1980, the executive board agreed to send the incoming board a written demand for a hearing concerning the payment of severance pay. The new executive board held such a hearing in February of 1981. Appellants requested severance pay totaling $191,000. The executive board denied the requests, whereupon appellants initiated this action. Appellants alleged that they were entitled to severance pay under the union's constitution and bylaws and the resolution of February 13, 1974. They claimed that Local 600 and IBT were jointly and severally liable because IBT had "ratified, implemented, and reaffirmed" the severance pay policies during a trusteeship of Local 600 that existed from June 1974 to February 1975...

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • Juveniles A, B, C, D, E, Matter of
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • March 11, 1993
  • Tile, Marble, Terrazzo, Finishers, Shopworkers and Granite Cutters Intern. Union AFL-CIO v. Tile, Marble, Terrazzo, Helpers and Finishers Local 32
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit
    • April 9, 1990
    ... ... The members also voted to transfer the balance of approximately $1,600 in the Local's bank account to a welfare fund established for the benefit of the members. In the ... 21 The case that the International primarily relies upon in its argument, Meyer v. Barnes, 867 F.2d 464 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 110 S.Ct. 86, 107 L.Ed.2d 51 ... ...
  • Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Kasal
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • August 31, 1990
    ... ... Page 488 ... Meuers, and Curtin & Barnes, Minneapolis, Minn., on the brief), for appellants ...         Brian E. Palmer, ... Meyer v. Barnes, 867 F.2d 464, 466 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----,110 S.Ct. 86, 107 L.Ed.2d 51 ... ...
  • Concerned Citizens of Nebraska (CCN) v. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Com'n (NRC)
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • August 17, 1992
    ... ... E.g., Meyer v. Barnes, 867 F.2d 464, 466 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 825, 110 S.Ct. 86, 107 L.Ed.2d 51 ... 9 See, e.g., Bowen v. Gilliard, 483 U.S. 587, 600-01, 107 S.Ct. 3008, 3016-17, 97 L.Ed.2d 485 (1987) (citing Dandridge v. Williams, 397 U.S. 471, ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT