Meyer v. Jacobs
Decision Date | 06 July 1903 |
Docket Number | 717. |
Citation | 123 F. 900 |
Parties | MEYER v. JACOBS et ux. |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of Nevada |
W. E F. Deal and Torreyson & Summerfield, for complainant.
Charles W. Slack, Cheney, Massey & Smith, and Thomas Wren, for defendants.
This is a suit in equity to set aside (I) a deed of conveyance of certain real estate situate in Reno, Nev., executed by Dora Lachman to Phillip Jacobs; (2) an assignment of insurance policies and the transfer of a note and mortgage to Phillip Jacobs in trust for her daughter Sylvia Jacobs; and (3) a bill of sale or assignment or transfer of all her personal property effects, jewelry, money in bank, stock, bonds, furniture, and securities of every kind and nature whatever, to her daughter Sylvia Jacobs-- upon the ground of the mental infirmities of Mrs. Lachman at the time of their execution, and of undue influence of the defendants during her illness.
Mrs Dora Lachman was the widow of Benjamin Lachman, deceased, from whom she inherited certain property, of the value of about $30,000. She had two daughters, both married-- Ettie Meyer, wife of Emil Meyer, complainant, and Sylvia Jacobs, wife of Phillip Jacobs, defendants herein. She died July 27, 1901, in San Francisco, Cal., aged 60 years. Her daughter Ettie was then 40 years of age. Sylvia was 20 years of age.
The deed of the real estate was executed and duly acknowledged July 8, 1901, in the presence of Morton R. Gibbons, George T. Knox, and Millie T. Barnett. The assignment of the insurance policies was executed and acknowledged on the same day. The transfer of the personal property was signed July 26th, the day before her death, in the presence of James Watt and George T. Knox. In the deed was a clause expressive of the uses and purposes of its execution, viz.:
The peculiar and unpleasant fact was brought out upon the trial that the opposing sisters prior to the institution of this suit had never met, although they had been in the same city at different times. The record shows that in 1878 Emil Meyer married the daughter Ettie; that after his marriage he and his wife lived with her parents as boarders for about three years; that during the time Ettie lived with her parents, both before and after her marriage, she did most of the ordinary housework; that in 1879 her husband became a partner with her father in a store at Reno, which relation continued for a short period of time, and then the Meyers removed from the Lachman residence, and rented other quarters; thereafter Benjamin Lachman left Reno and went to Ft. Bidwell; that in 1882, or thereabouts, Mrs. Dora Lachman returned to Reno for a short visit, and stayed with her daughter Ettie; that after the mother's return to Ft. Bidwell the daughter Ettie and her husband removed to San Francisco, and remained there three or four years, then went to Portland, Or., and lived there about four years, returned to San Francisco in 1896, and have lived there ever since. In the meantime the Lachmans returned to Reno, Nev.
There is more or less testimony that an estrangement occurred between the two families, owing to difficulties that occurred during the partnership of the husband with the father; the statement of the witnesses being to the effect that Emil Meyer, while a partner of Benjamin Lachman, had obtained more than his share of the money received from the business. This, say the witnesses, was the common talk of the relatives of the families, and of other people in Reno. The complainant, in her testimony, said:
More than two dozen letters were introduced, written by Mrs. Lachman to Mrs. Meyer, commencing in the early part of the year 1894, and continuing up to February, 1896. These letters were addressed either to 'Dear Children,' 'Dear Ettie,' 'Dear Ettie and Emil,' and three were to Dear Emil. ' They all breathe a warm and true affection and love towards Ettie, and a friendship and good will for her husband. There is not, up to the time of Sylvia's engagement, a jarring note of discord, or any unpleasant family expressions. To present the matter in its true light, some extracts should be taken therefrom. As a prelude thereto, it should be stated that at the time of the commencement of the correspondence Ettie was in poor health, suffering from an operation that had been performed. At the receipt of this news, the mother, February 26, 1894, said:
March 6th she said:
April 16th:
April 27th,
May 8th:
May 24th:
August 18th,
October 6th:
November 7th:
December, 1895:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Smelser v. Meier
...332; Taylor v. Taylor, 49 U.S. 183, 12 L.Ed. 1040; Jenkins v. Pye, 37 U.S. 241, 9 L.Ed. 1070; De Roux v. Girard's Exr., 112 F. 89; Meyer v. Jacobs, 123 F. 900; McElroy Masterson, 156 F. 36. We do not understand, nor do we hold, that the Married Woman's Act of 1889 has absolutely destroyed t......
-
Myers v. Myers
... ... without reason, or he may disinherit all his children and ... give his estate to a [185 Md. 218] stranger. Meyer v ... Jacobs, C.C., 123 F. 900, 909. Of course, where the ... issue is mental capacity, fraud, or undue influence, the ... fairness or ... ...
-
Myers v. Myers, 8.
...one and disinherit another with or without reason, or he may disinherit all his children and give his estate to a stranger. Meyer v. Jacobs, C.C., 123 F. 900, 909. Of course, where the issue is mental capacity, fraud, or undue influence, the fairness or unfairness of a gift may be considere......
-
Bush v. Bush
...Ct. 705, 34 L. Ed. 84; Towson v. Moore, 173 U.S. 17, 19 S. Ct. 332, 43 L. Ed. 597; Sawyer v. White, 122 F. 223, 58 C. C. A. 587; Meyer v. Jacobs, 123 F. 900. ¶23 The doctrine is recognized in Oklahoma: "While the relation of a parent and child exists between the parties, this, within itself......