Michigan Cab Co. v. Kavanagh

Decision Date03 October 1941
Docket NumberNo. 1837.,1837.
Citation82 F. Supp. 486
PartiesMICHIGAN CAB CO. v. KAVANAGH, Collector of Internal Revenue.
CourtU.S. District Court — Western District of Michigan

Shields, Ballard, Jennings & Taber and Donald G. Fox, all of Lansing, Mich, for plaintiff.

John C. Lehr, Dist. Atty., and J. Thomas Smith, Asst. Dist. Atty., both of Detroit, Mich., for defendant.

LEDERLE, Chief Judge.

Findings of Fact

I. Plaintiff, a Michigan corporation, filed its complaint against the Commissioner of Internal Revenue for the District of Michigan on May 1, 1940, seeking to recover taxes paid for the month of August, 1937, under Title VIII of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C.A. § 1001 et seq., which plaintiff claims were erroneously and illegally assessed and collected by the defendant Commissioner, in the amount of $233.40. Plaintiff paid under protest the tax as assessed in October, 1939, and duly filed a claim for a refund, which was denied by the Social Security Board on April 25, 1940.

II. Plaintiff owns and operates a fleet of approximately fifty taxicabs in the Cities of Lansing, Kalamazoo and Battle Creek, Michigan, and is authorized by the State of Michigan to conduct "a general cab and taxi business."

Since 1929 plaintiff's cabs have been operated under written agreements entitled "Agreement for Hire of Taxicab" by drivers licensed as chauffeurs by proper city and state authorities.

In accordance with the terms of these agreements, plaintiff owns and furnishes cabs, oil, insurance and mechanical services in connection therewith and dispatches all orders. The drivers in turn pay $4.25 per twelve-hour shift for the use of a cab and plaintiff's services, plus the cost of the gasoline consumed. In addition, each driver must deposit $25 with the plaintiff subject to a guarantee that the cab assigned to him will be returned in good condition and will be on the street properly manned each day the driver is supposed to be on duty unless notice is given to the company by the driver twenty-four hours in advance. For failure to work without giving the proper notice, the company has the right to deduct the stipulated rental for the cab from the driver's deposit.

The cabs must all be operated as units of the Plaintiff's fleet. The drivers all wear similar uniforms; are subject to company rules and regulations; and are subject to dismissal by the company for incompetency.

The drivers, except those in the City of Battle Creek, are all members of the American Federation of Labor, and have entered into the usual employer-employee union agreement with the plaintiff company.

They are required to report accidents to the company "immediately" and are bound to reimburse the company for any damage or expense caused by their fault or neglect.

III. Plaintiff was advised by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue on December 23, 1936, that it would be held liable for the tax under the Social Security Act. Plaintiff was unable to collect the tax and had difficulty in obtaining any reports of earnings from its drivers until 1939. On the failure of the plaintiff to collect the tax in 1936, the Commissioner assigned a deputy collector to prepare and file a tax return for the plaintiff company. After interviewing three of plaintiff's drivers and examining plaintiff's books and records as to the hours worked, the Examiner estimated the average earnings of plaintiff's drivers to be $6 per day. The assessment here involved was then based on the estimate obtained...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • United States v. Fleming
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • 29 d2 Agosto d2 1961
    ...1941, 121 F.2d 176; Kaus v. Huston, D.C.N.D.Iowa 1940, 35 F.Supp. 327, affirmed 8 Cir., 1941, 120 F.2d 183; Michigan Cab Co. v. Kavanagh, D.C.E.D.Mich. 1941, 82 F.Supp. 486; Read v. Warkentin, 185 Kan. 286, 341 P.2d 980; Salt Lake Transportation Co. v. Board of Review, 5 Utah 2d 87, 296 P.2......
  • Morgan Cab Co. v. Industrial Commission
    • United States
    • Illinois Supreme Court
    • 30 d4 Janeiro d4 1975
    ...Cir. 19741), 121 F.2d 176; Kaus v. Huston (N.D.Iowa 1940), 35 F.Supp. 327, aff'd (8th Cir. 1941), 120 F.2d 183; Michigan Cab Co. v. Kavanagh (E.D.Mich.1941), 82 F.Supp. 486; Kaus v. Unemployment Compensation Commission (1941), 230 Iowa 860, 299 N.W. 415; Salt Lake Transportation Co. v. Boar......
  • Party Cab Co. v. United States of America
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit
    • 18 d2 Janeiro d2 1949
    ...Kaus v. Huston, D.C., 35 F.Supp. 327 (affirmed without deciding the merits, 8 Cir., 120 F.2d 183), and Michigan Cab Co. v. Kavanagh, D.C.Mich., East Dist., Sou. Div., 82 F.Supp. 486. Such drivers have been held not to be employees in Woods v. Nicholas, 10 Cir., 163 F.2d 615; Magruder v. Yel......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT