Michl v. General Elec. Co.

Decision Date21 June 1988
Docket NumberNo. 87-755,87-755
Citation13 Fla. L. Weekly 1454,526 So.2d 1046
Parties13 Fla. L. Weekly 1454 Sonya MICHL, Appellant/Cross-appellee, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY and Gray Stores, Inc., Appellees/Cross-appellants.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County; Fredricka G. smith, judge.

Kirkpatrick & Lockhart and Jeffrey A. Tew and Robert B. Galt, III and Daniel A. Casey, Miami, for appellant.

Blackwell, Walker, Fascell & Hoehl and Douglas H. Stein, Miami, for appellee.

Before HUBBART, BASKIN and FERGUSON, * JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Sonya Michl raises several points on appeal. She maintains that the trial court erred in: failing to permit certain rebuttal testimony; refusing to permit introduction of correspondence between consumers and appellee General Electric Company; denying requested jury instructions; and limiting cross-examination of an expert witness. Finding no merit in these contentions, we affirm. See Giordano v. Ramirez, 503 So.2d 947 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Riveron v. Jervis B. Webb Co., 488 So.2d 547 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Gencorp, Inc. v. Wolfe, 481 So.2d 109 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), review denied, 491 So.2d 281 (Fla.1986); 3-M Corp.--McGhan Medical Reports Div. v. Brown, 475 So.2d 994 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); Thomas v. Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co., 424 So.2d 36 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Coral Plaza Corp. v. Hersman, 220 So.2d 672 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 229 So.2d 867 (Fla.1969); see also Robison v. Faine, 525 So.2d 903, 905 n. 2 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). Cf. State, Dept. of Transportation v. Alvarez, 490 So.2d 1068 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 500 So.2d 543 (Fla.1986).

Affirmed.

* Judge Ferguson did not participate in oral argument.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT