Michota v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.
Decision Date | 19 September 1980 |
Docket Number | 76-1931.,Civ. A. No. 77-2543 |
Citation | 526 F. Supp. 299 |
Parties | Bruno MICHOTA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ANHEUSER-BUSCH, INC., et al., Defendants. Gustav A. ADAMS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. TRUSTEES OF the N. J. BREWERY EMPLOYEES' PENSION TRUST FUND, et al., Defendants. |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of New Jersey |
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
Hellring, Lindeman, Goldstein & Siegal by Richard K. Coplon, Newark, N. J., for Michota et al.
McMenaman & Grasso by Ronald E. Hoffman, Spring Lake Heights, N. J., for Adams et al.
Kapp & Finkel by Herman W. Kapp, Newark, N. J., for defendant Rheingold Breweries.
Stryker, Tams & Dill by John J. Rizzo, Newark, N. J., for defendant Pabst Brewing Co.
Carpenter, Bennett & Morrissey by Edward F. Ryan, Rosemary A. Hall, Newark, N. J., for defendant Anheuser-Busch, Inc. Orloff, Lowenbach, Stifelman & Siegel by Jeffrey M. Garrod, Newark, N. J., for defendant Falstaff Brewing Corp.
This complex litigation concerns the pensions of certain former employees of the P. Ballantine & Sons (Ballantine) brewery formerly located in Newark, New Jersey.
In 1956, Ballantine, along with several other employers, entered into an Agreement and Declaration of Trust with the Brewery Workers Joint Local Executive Board of New Jersey (Teamsters Locals 843 and 153, hereinafter the Union) and the New Jersey Brewers Association. The Agreement was denominated "New Jersey Brewery Employees Pension Trust Fund" (hereinafter Trust Fund). Among the other participating employers were Anheuser-Busch, Inc. (Budweiser), Pabst Brewing Co. (Pabst) and Liebmann Breweries, Inc. (Rheingold). The Trust Fund was jointly administered under § 302(c)(5) of the Labor-Management Relations Act of 1947 (LMRA), 29 U.S.C. § 186(c)(5). In June 1956, the trustees of the Trust Fund established a pension plan (hereinafter Brewery Plan) effective August 1, 1955.
To lend context to the facts leading to the institution of this lawsuit, some explication of the salient provisions of the Trust Fund and Brewery Plan is necessary.
Additionally, upon withdrawal an employer had, with certain irrelevant exceptions, "no further ... obligations ... under this Trust Agreement." Article VI, § 6.2(b).
Ballantine's Newark brewery terminated operations effective April 1, 1972. As of that date,2 the Brewery Plan contained the following relevant provisions.
Article I, § 14 of the Brewery Plan defined "Credited Service" as "the years of an Employee's past service and future service credit." Past service referred to the years an employee had worked prior to his employer becoming a contributor to the Trust Fund. Article I, § 14(b). Future service referred to credit received by an employee for employment from the time his employer was obligated to contribute. Article I, § 14(a). As in the Trust Fund, the term "Employer" in the Brewery Plan referred to an employer obligated to contribute to the Trust Fund by the terms of a CBA. Article I, § 9. An "Employee" meant "an employee on behalf of whom contributions shall be required" by virtue of a CBA. Article I, § 11.
Pursuant to Article I, § 14(c), an employee lost his credited service if the employee "ceased to be employed by an Employer ... and did not become re-employed by such Employer or employed by another Employer within ... one year following ... cessation of employment, except as provided in Article X." Section 2 of Article X provided that "notwithstanding the provisions of § 14(c) ... an Employee whose employment is terminated shall be eligible for a pension at age 65 provided that at the time his employment is terminated he has completed ... the number of years of Credited Service for future service" determined by reference to a table set forth in the Brewery Plan. That table provided that, for plan years 1965 and later, 10 years of credited service for future service was necessary for an employee to come within Article X, § 2. This section was apparently derived from a proviso contained in earlier versions of Article I, § 14(c) which stated that the forfeiture provisions did not "apply as to loss of Credited Service if an Employee has completed at least 10 years of Credited Service for future service when he ceases to be employed by an Employer."
Eligibility for pension benefits was outlined in Article II. As provided in the Brewery Plan, an employee was eligible when he had "completed at least ten (10) years of Credited Service and attained age 65," had "completed at least thirty (30) years of Credited Service" or reached the compulsory retirement age of 67. Furthermore, Article II, § 2 provided for an early retirement option for an employee who had reached age 60 and had obtained between 15 and 30 years of credited service. That section included "a terminated Employee ... entitled to a deferred pension as provided in Article X." See also Article X, § 3 ( ).
To continue reading
Request your trial-
McLendon v. Continental Group, Inc.
...cited by defendant, see, e.g., Anderson v. Alpha Portland Industries, Inc., 727 F.2d 177 (8th Cir.1984); Michota v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc., 526 F.Supp. 299, 318-22 (D.N. J.1980), rev'd on other grounds, 670 F.2d 387 (3d Cir.1982), what is at issue here is not the enforcement of contractual ri......
-
Dameron v. Sinai Hosp. of Baltimore, Inc.
...e.g., Jenkins v. Local 705, 713 F.2d at 254; Mahan v. Reynolds Metal Co., 569 F.Supp. 482, 485 (E.D.Ark. 1983); Michota v. Anheuser Busch, Inc., 526 F.Supp. 299, 321 (D.N.J.1980), affirmed in part, reversed on other grounds, 670 F.2d 387 (3rd Cir.1982). Some balance must be struck to effect......
-
United Paperworkers v. International Paper Co.
...(D.Mass.1984) (Caffrey, C.J.); DeLisi v. United Parcel Service, Inc., 580 F.Supp. 1572, 1575 (W.D.Pa.1984); Michota v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc., 526 F.Supp. 299, 321 (D.N.J.1980). Courts have created limited exceptions to application of the exhaustion doctrine to ERISA suits where purposes unde......
-
Adams v. New Jersey Brewery Employees' Pension Trust Fund, Local Union 843
...and analysis to be both complete and correct. Accordingly, we adopt Parts V through VIII of the district court's opinion. 526 F.Supp. 299 (D.N.J.1980). Grievable Claims Against Budweiser 51. The Michota plaintiffs, claiming that it is not a grievable matter, have sued Budweiser over the lat......