Middle Rio Grande Water Users Ass'n v. Middle Rio Grande Conservancy District
Decision Date | 11 May 1953 |
Docket Number | No. 5544,5544 |
Citation | 258 P.2d 391,57 N.M. 287,1953 NMSC 35 |
Parties | MIDDLE RIO GRANDE WATER USERS ASS'N v. MIDDLE RIO GRANDE CONSERVANCY DIST. |
Court | New Mexico Supreme Court |
A. T. Hannett, G. W. Hannett and W. S. Lindamood, Albuquerque, for appellant.
Martin A. Threet and D. A. Macpherson, Jr., Albuquerque, for appellee.
This is an appeal from a decree holding legal a contract entered into by the United States of America and the Middle Rio Grande Conservancy District.
The appellant's statement of the case so clearly presents the issues raised below and the action of the court there that we will first copy it and then dispose of the legal questions under the points urged by them. We quote:
'That under the terms of said contract, among other things, appellee's obligation for the works and benefits to be performed by the United States of America is to reimburse the United States of America to the maximum of $18,000,000 payable over a period of forty years without interest.
'Appellee also alleges on information and belief that it would be and is for the best interests of the landowners, farmers, and water users within the appellee's boundaries that this contract be approved and confirmed in all respects by the Conservancy Court * * *.
'In response to said petition the Court made its order setting the matter for hearing, after due notice, on the 13th of December, 1951.
'On the 12th of December, 1951, the Middle Rio Grande Water Users Association, hereinafter referred to as appellant comprised of some 324 water users engaged in the cultivation of soil within the boundaries of appellee, in its own behalf and in behalf of others similarly situated, filed its demurrer and answer, by which appellant challenged the sufficiency of the petition for the following reasons:
'By the terms of appellant's answer appellant denies the allegations set forth in paragraph 4 of appellee's petition and affirmatively alleges that all of the alleged agreements on the part of the United States, by the terms of said contract, are subject to the vicissitudes of Congressional appropriations, and in event of failure on the part of the United States to make such appropriations neither the appellee not the water users would have a remedy.
'Appellant in its answer denied the allegations set forth in paragraph 6 of the petition which alleges in effect, upon information and belief, that it would be for the best interests of the landowners, farmers, and water users that the contract be in all respects approved and confirmed.
As there is no question but that a large number of landowners within the District belong to the appellant association and oppose the contract, and as the material facts are undisputed, we feel the attacks on the legality of the contracy may be answered by taking up the legal matters raised, first determining the jurisdiction of the trial court in passing upon the legality and validity of the contract, and, in turn, our jurisdiction in passing...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Holguin v. Elephant Butte Irrigation Dist.
...appurtenant to the land and that the district only stores and delivers them to the users. Middle Rio Grande Water Users Ass'n v. Middle Rio Grande Conservancy Dist., 57 N.M. 287, 258 P.2d 391 (1953). In State v. McLean, 62 N.M. 264, 308 P.2d 983 (1957) this court held that water belongs to ......
-
Cartwright v. Public Service Co. of N.M., 6172
...of confiscation always present when private and public rights or claims collide. Compare, Middle Rio Grande Water Users Ass'n v. Middle Rio Grande Conservancy Dist., 57 N.M. 287, 310, 258 P.2d 391. So, here, we see in the Pueblo Rights doctrine the elevation of the public good over the clai......
-
Craig v. Superior Court
...in his work. It is properly translated as 'The Safety of the people is the supreme law.' (See Middle Rio Grande W.U. Ass'n v. Middle Rio Grande C.D., 57 N.M. 287, 258 P.2d 391, 405; emphasis This time-honored truism of our law expresses the basis upon which all civilized, and even primitive......
-
U.S. v. Tulare Lake Canal Co.
...primarily to improve vested water rights would not appear to be unique. See, e. g., Middle Rio Grande Water Users Ass'n v. Middle Rio Grande Conservancy Dist., 57 N.M. 287, 258 P.2d 391 (1953); Application of Frenchman Valley Irrigation Dist., 167 Neb. 78, 91 N.W.2d 415 (1958); Hearings on ......