Midgett v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary, 11

Decision Date15 June 1962
Docket NumberNo. 11,11
Citation229 Md. 617,182 A.2d 52
PartiesCurtis Edward MIDGETT (Alias) Thoma Olin Ballance v. WARDEN OF the MARYLAND PENITENTIARY. Post Conviction
CourtMaryland Court of Appeals

Before BRUNE, C. J., and HENDERSON, HAMMOND, PRESCOTT, HORNEY, MARBURY and SYBERT, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Application for leave to appeal is denied for the specific reasons held by the trial judge in her opinion in this proceeding to be applicable to each of the applicant's grounds for relief, respectively.

Application denied.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Midgett v. Warden, Maryland State Penitentiary
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Maryland
    • June 11, 1963
    ...which was adopted by the Court of Appeals of Maryland when it denied Midgett's application for leave to appeal therefrom. Midgett v. Warden, 229 Md. 617, 182 A. 2d 52. The present petition sets out seven "reasons presented" for granting the writ, a confusing "statement of the case", a four-......
  • Midgett v. McClelland
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit
    • January 13, 1977
    ...per curiam had again made the same judgment, on the grounds stated by Judge Jones, a State trial judge, Midgett v. Warden, Post Conviction No. 11, 229 Md. 617, 182 A.2d 52 (1962), after the second trial. His statement is quoted by Judge Thomsen, 217 F.Supp. The absence of a "constitutional ......
  • Midgett v. Warden, Maryland State Penitentiary
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit
    • February 25, 1964
    ...Court of Baltimore. His petition was dismissed and leave to appeal was denied by the Maryland Court of Appeals, Midgett v. Warden, etc., 229 Md. 617, 182 A.2d 52 (1962), which adopted the opinion of the lower court. Because the background facts are thoroughly documented in these references,......
  • Midgett v. Warden, Md. Penitentiary, 79
    • United States
    • Maryland Court of Appeals
    • March 9, 1966
    ...CURIAM. This is applicant's fourth visit to this Court. The circumstances attendant upon the others will be found in Midgett v. Warden, 229 Md. 617, 182 A.2d 52 (1962); Midgett v. State, 223 Md. 282, 164 A.2d 526 (1960); Midgett v. State, 216 Md. 26, 139 A.2d 209 Along the way applicant als......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT