Midili v. Erie Insurance Group
| Decision Date | 11 January 2000 |
| Citation | 746 A.2d 1126 |
| Parties | Sandra W. MIDILI, in her own right, and as Executrix of the Estate of Arnold W. Midili, Deceased, Appellant v. ERIE INSURANCE GROUP, Appellee. |
| Court | Pennsylvania Superior Court |
John P. Gismondi, Pittsburgh, for appellant.
Stephen P. McCloskey, Washington, for appellee.
Before McEWEN, President Judge, DEL SOLE, KELLY, POPOVICH, JOHNSON, FORD ELLIOTT, EAKIN, JOYCE, and STEVENS, JJ.
¶ 1 This appeal asks us to determine the validity of a provision in an automobile insurance policy that precludes underinsured motorist coverage where the ostensibly underinsured vehicle is owned and operated by a government unit. We dispose of this appeal in accordance with our recent decision in Kmonk-Sullivan v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co., 746 A.2d 1118 (Pa.Super.1999), in which we concluded that such exclusions are contrary to the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law (MVFRL) and void against public policy. In the instant case, we reverse the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Washington County, which upheld an arbitration award denying underinsured motorist (UIM) benefits to an insured pursuant to a government vehicle exclusion in that insured's automobile insurance policy.
¶ 2 On October 2, 1994, Arnold W. Midili was killed in an automobile accident when the car he was driving was struck by a motor vehicle operated by an employee of Allegheny County. The parties stipulated that Mr. Midili's death resulted from the negligent conduct of the county employee. Sandra Midili, the decedent's wife, collected $500,000 in damages from Allegheny County. That amount was the maximum amount payable for a single tort claim against a local government unit under the Political Subdivision Tort Claims Act (PTSCA). 42 Pa.C.S. § 8553(b). Mrs. Midili then sought to recover $300,000 in UIM benefits under a personal automobile insurance policy issued to her and her decedent-husband by Erie Insurance Group (Erie). Although Erie agreed that Mrs. Midili's total damages exceed $800,000, Erie refused to pay the claim based on the government vehicle exclusion contained in the policy. The government vehicle exclusion in the policy states that an underinsured motor vehicle does not include motor vehicles owned by a government unit or agency. The exclusion precluded Mrs. Midili from claiming UIM benefits under her policy, since Mr. Midili was killed in an automobile accident caused by the negligence of an Allegheny County employee operating a vehicle owned by Allegheny County.
¶ 3 On June 20, 1997, a board of arbitrators, in a 2-1 decision, found in favor of Erie. The Honorable Thomas D. Gladden of the Court of Common Pleas of Washington County adopted the arbitrators' decision on October 27, 1997, and...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Richmond v. Prudential Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co.
...an arbitration award that declares an insurance policy clause void as violative of public policy). See also Midili v. Erie Ins. Group, 746 A.2d 1126, 1127 (Pa.Super.2000) (en banc) (reversing the decision of a panel of arbitrators and finding that a government vehicle exclusion in an automo......
-
Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co. v. Cosenza
...unambiguous definitions of underinsured vehicles that exclude vehicles owned by government agencies. See, e.g., Midili v. Erie Insurance Group, 746 A.2d 1126 (Pa. Super. 2000); Kmonk-Sullivan v. State Farm Mut. Ins. Co., 746 A.2d 1118 (Pa. Super. 1999). Courts have also refused to enforce c......
-
Richmond v. Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance Company, 2004 PA Super 328 (PA 8/24/2004)
...an arbitration award that declares an insurance policy clause void as violative of public policy). See also Midili v. Erie Ins. Group, 746 A.2d 1126, 1127 (Pa.Super. 2000) (en banc) (reversing the decision of a panel of arbitrators and finding that a government vehicle exclusion in an autom......
-
Kmonk-Sullivan v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
...set forth the facts and procedural history of the two cases, Kmonk-Sullivan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and Midili v. Erie Insurance Group. Kmonk-Sullivan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance In Kmonk-Sullivan, approximately fifty passengers on a Port Authority of......