Midland Funding, LLC v. Raney
Decision Date | 04 January 2018 |
Docket Number | NO. 5–16–0479,5–16–0479 |
Citation | 93 N.E.3d 724,2018 IL App (5th) 160479 |
Parties | MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, Plaintiff and Counterdefendant–Appellant, v. Teresa RANEY and Shirley Darnell, Defendants and Counterplaintiffs–Appellees. |
Court | United States Appellate Court of Illinois |
Heather L. Kramer, Rosa M. Tumialán, and Jennifer A. Warner, of Dykema Gossett PLLC, of Chicago, and Theodore W. Seitz, of Dykema Gossett PLLC, of Lansing, Michigan, for appellant.
David I. Cates and Chad M. Mooney, of Cates Mahoney, LLC, of Swansea, and Brendan M. Nester and Sean K. Cronin, of Donovan Rose Nester, P.C., of Belleville, for appellees.
¶ 1 In this interlocutory appeal brought pursuant to Illinois Supreme Court Rule 307(a)(1) (eff. Feb. 26, 2010), the plaintiff-counterdefendant, Midland Funding, LLC (Midland Funding), appeals the circuit court's order denying its motion to dismiss and to compel arbitration of counterclaims filed by the defendants-counterplaintiffs, Teresa Raney and Shirley Darnell. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
¶ 3 Darnell and Raney acquired consumer credit card accounts issued by Citibank, N.A. (Citibank), wherein they were provided with specified lines of credit for consumer purchases in exchange for paying at least the minimum amounts shown on monthly billing statements. On June 11, 2015, Midland Funding, as Citibank's assignee, filed complaints against Darnell and Raney, seeking judgments in the sums of $5848.91, and $16,843.42, respectively, plus court costs, for the amounts due and owing via the Citibank lines of credit. Midland Funding alleged that it was the successor in interest to the Citibank accounts, that Midland Funding had purchased Darnell's and Raney's credit card account obligations from Citibank in the regular course of business, that Darnell and Raney had failed to make the monthly payments on said accounts and were in default on the accounts, and that Midland Funding was entitled to a judgment for the unpaid balances plus costs. Midland Funding alleged that it had purchased the accounts from Citibank on October 14, 2014 (Darnell), and April 23, 2014 (Raney), for good and valuable consideration, as evidenced by an attached bill of sale and assignment. Midland Funding also attached account statements showing a $5848.91 Sears MasterCard account balance for Darnell and a $16,843.47 Sears Premier MasterCard balance for Raney.
¶ 4 Midland Funding attached to its complaint against Darnell the affidavit of Andrew Lankey. In the affidavit dated April 16, 2015, Lankey stated that he was employed as a legal specialist with access to pertinent account records for Midland Credit Management, Inc. (MCM), servicer of Darnell's account on behalf of Midland Funding. Based upon his personal knowledge of the account records, Lankey stated that Midland Funding was the current owner of the obligation and was assigned all rights, title, and interest to Darnell's Citibank account. Lankey stated that MCM's records showed that Darnell owed a balance of $5848.91, as of April 13, 2015. Lankey stated that Darnell opened the Citibank account on November 1, 1986, the last payment posted to the account on December 17, 2013, and the account was charged off on July 29, 2014.
¶ 5 Midland Funding attached to its complaint against Raney the affidavit of Rhonda Schubloom. In the affidavit dated April 16, 2015, Schubloom stated that she was employed as a legal specialist with access to pertinent account records for MCM, servicer of Raney's account on behalf of Midland Funding. Based on her personal knowledge of the account records maintained on Midland Funding's behalf, Schubloom stated that Midland Funding was the current owner of the obligation and was assigned all rights, title, and interest to Raney's Citibank account. Schobloom stated that MCM's records showed that Raney owed a balance of $16,843.42 as of April 14, 2015. Schubloom stated that Raney opened the Citibank account on February 1, 1994, the last payment posted to the account on March 1, 2013, and the account was charged off on October 7, 2013.
¶ 6 In July 2015, Raney and Darnell filed answers and affirmative defenses. They also filed class action counterclaims seeking to certify statewide and nationwide classes and seeking damages based on purported violations of the Collection Agency Act ( 225 ILCS 425/1 et seq. (West 2014)), the Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act ( 815 ILCS 505/1 et seq. (West 2014)), and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ( 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq. (2012) ). The counterclaims challenged Midland Funding's alleged practice of suing to collect debt purchased from others without sufficient proof of ownership of the debt.
¶ 7 On November 18, 2015, and December 1, 2015, Midland Funding filed motions to dismiss the counterclaims pursuant to section 2–619 of the Code of Civil Procedure ( 735 ILCS 5/2–619 (West 2014) ) and to compel arbitration. Midland Funding argued that because the counterclaims were within the scope of a binding card agreement that included an agreement to arbitrate and a class action waiver provision (the Card Agreement), the class claims were barred and should be dismissed. Midland Funding argued that the arbitration provision in the Card Agreement was subject to the Federal Arbitration Act ( 9 U.S.C. § 1 et seq. (2012) ) and that Midland Funding was entitled to elect arbitration as the forum within which to address the putative class claims alleged in the counterclaims. To its motions, Midland Funding attached account statements and a November 25, 2015, declaration of Michael Burger, senior manager of operations for MCM. In the declaration, Burger stated, in pertinent part:
¶ 8 Midland Funding attached the Card Agreement referenced in paragraph 8 of the declaration identified as Exhibit E. The language of the Card Agreement stated, Arbitration was identified as a section change to the Card Agreement. In the arbitration section of the Card Agreement, it stated, in relevant part:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hartz v. Brehm Preparatory Sch., Inc.
...procedure effectively restrained defendant's exercise of contractual right to compel arbitration); Midland Funding, LLC v. Raney , 2018 IL App (5th) 160479, 419 Ill.Dec. 605, 93 N.E.3d 724 (motion to dismiss and compel arbitration); Travis v. American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Co. , 33......
-
Brookner v. Gen. Motors Corp.
...under federal rules or state law, there can be no forced arbitration without a valid contract to arbitrate." Midland Funding, LLC v. Raney , 2018 IL App (5th) 160479, ¶ 19, 419 Ill.Dec. 605, 93 N.E.3d 724 (citing Tortoriello v. Gerald Nissan of North Aurora, Inc. , 379 Ill. App. 3d 214, 226......
-
Siena At Old Orchard Condo. Ass'n v. Siena at Old Orchard, L.L.C.
...Insurance Co. v. Personnel Staffing Group, LLC , 2018 IL App (1st) 172281, ¶ 10, 423 Ill.Dec. 571, 105 N.E.3d 979 ; Midland Funding, LLC v. Raney , 2018 IL App (5th) 160479, ¶ 1, 419 Ill.Dec. 605, 93 N.E.3d 724. Accordingly, we have jurisdiction to consider the present appeal. ¶ 19 In the c......