Midtown Properties, Inc. v. Madison Tp., A--956
Decision Date | 22 March 1963 |
Docket Number | No. A--956,A--956 |
Citation | 78 N.J.Super. 471,189 A.2d 226 |
Parties | MIDTOWN PROPERTIES, INC., a corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOWNSHIP OF MADISON, New Jersey, a municipal corporation, and Planning Board of the Township of Madison, Defendants-Respondents. |
Court | New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division |
Aaron Heller, Passaic, for appellant (Heller & Laiks, Passaic, attorneys).
Harold G. Smith, Matawan, for respondents (Harold G. Smith, Matawan, attorney for Township of Madison, John J. Salvest, Parlin, attorney for Planning Bd. of Township of Madison).
Before Judges FOLEY, PRICE and SULLIVAN.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Halpern, reported in 68 N.J.Super. 197, 172 A.2d 40 (Law Div.1961).
To continue reading
Request your trial-
METRO. HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP. v. Village of Arlington Heights
...Inc. v. Township of Madison, 68 N.J.Super. 197, 205-207, 172 A.2d 40, 45-46 (1961) (reaching similar result), aff'd. 78 N.J.Super. 471, 189 A.2d 226 (App.Div.1963). See also Allender v. City of Chicago Zoning Board of Appeals, 63 Ill.App.3d 204, 211, 21 Ill.Dec. 69, 75, 381 N.E.2d 4, 10 (1s......
-
City of Jersey City v. Roosevelt Stadium Marina, Inc.
...discussion infra. Midtown Properties, Inc. v. Madison Tp., 68 N.J.Super. 197, 208, 172 A.2d 40 (Law Div.1961), aff'd o.b. 78 N.J.Super. 471, 189 A.2d 226 (App.Div.1963); City of Tulsa v. Oklahoma State Pen. & Retirement Bd., 674 P.2d 10 (Okla.1983); 17 McQuillan, Municipal Corporations (3rd......
-
Warner Co. v. Sutton
...Similarly, in Midtown Properties, Inc. v. Madison Tp., 68 N.J.Super. 197, 202, 172 A.2d 40 (Law Div.1961), aff'd o.b., 78 N.J.Super. 471, 189 A.2d 226 (App.Div.1963), the property owner had obtained preliminary subdivision but before final subdivision approval was granted, the Township amen......
-
Piscitelli v. Township Committee of Scotch Plains Tp.
...(1952); Midtown Properties, Inc. v. Madison Tp., 68 N.J.Super. 197, 207, 172 A.2d 40 (Law Div.1961), affirmed per curiam 78 N.J.Super. 471, 189 A.2d 226 (App.Div.1963). See also Stoker v. Irvington, 71 N.J.Super. 370, 177 A.2d 61 (Law Div.1961); Magnolia Development Co., Inc. v. Coles, 10 N......