Midtown Properties, Inc. v. Madison Tp.
| Decision Date | 22 March 1963 |
| Docket Number | No. A--956,A--956 |
| Citation | 189 A.2d 226,78 N.J. Super. 471 |
| Parties | MIDTOWN PROPERTIES, INC., a corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOWNSHIP OF MADISON, New Jersey, a municipal corporation, and Planning Board of the Township of Madison, Defendants-Respondents. |
| Court | New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division |
Aaron Heller, Passaic, for appellant(Heller & Laiks, Passaic, attorneys).
Harold G. Smith, Matawan, for respondents(Harold G. Smith, Matawan, attorney for Township of Madison, John J. Salvest, Parlin, attorney for Planning Bd. of Township of Madison).
Before Judges FOLEY, PRICE and SULLIVAN.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Halpern, reported in 68 N.J.Super. 197, 172 A.2d 40(Law Div.1961).
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
33 cases
-
METRO. HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP. v. Village of Arlington Heights
...Inc. v. Township of Madison, 68 N.J.Super. 197, 205-207, 172 A.2d 40, 45-46 (1961) (reaching similar result), aff'd. 78 N.J.Super. 471, 189 A.2d 226 (App.Div.1963). See also Allender v. City of Chicago Zoning Board of Appeals, 63 Ill.App.3d 204, 211, 21 Ill.Dec. 69, 75, 381 N.E.2d 4, 10 (1s......
-
City of Jersey City v. Roosevelt Stadium Marina, Inc.
...discussion infra. Midtown Properties, Inc. v. Madison Tp., 68 N.J.Super. 197, 208, 172 A.2d 40 (Law Div.1961), aff'd o.b. 78 N.J.Super. 471, 189 A.2d 226 (App.Div.1963); City of Tulsa v. Oklahoma State Pen. & Retirement Bd., 674 P.2d 10 (Okla.1983); 17 McQuillan, Municipal Corporations (3rd......
-
Warner Co. v. Sutton
...Similarly, in Midtown Properties, Inc. v. Madison Tp., 68 N.J.Super. 197, 202, 172 A.2d 40 (Law Div.1961), aff'd o.b., 78 N.J.Super. 471, 189 A.2d 226 (App.Div.1963), the property owner had obtained preliminary subdivision but before final subdivision approval was granted, the Township amen......
-
Piscitelli v. Township Committee of Scotch Plains Tp.
...(1952); Midtown Properties, Inc. v. Madison Tp., 68 N.J.Super. 197, 207, 172 A.2d 40 (Law Div.1961), affirmed per curiam 78 N.J.Super. 471, 189 A.2d 226 (App.Div.1963). See also Stoker v. Irvington, 71 N.J.Super. 370, 177 A.2d 61 (Law Div.1961); Magnolia Development Co., Inc. v. Coles, 10 N......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
Chapter 31 Settlements and Consent Orders
...Dec. 46 (5th Dist. 1977).[4] . Midtown Properties, Inc. v. Township of Madison, 68 N.J. Super. 197, 172 A.2d 40 (Law Div. 1961), aff'd, 78 N.J. Super. 471 (App. Div. 1963).[5] . Id. 172 A.2d at 45 (citations omitted). For an Illinois Supreme Court case in accord, see Ad-Ex, Inc. v. City of ......