Midway Mfg. Co. v. Bandai-America, Inc.
Decision Date | 22 July 1982 |
Docket Number | Civ. A. No. 81-3911. |
Citation | 546 F. Supp. 125 |
Parties | MIDWAY MFG. CO., an Illinois corporation, Plaintiff, v. BANDAI-AMERICA, INC., a New Jersey corporation, Bandai Company, Ltd., a Japanese corporation, Bandai Overseas Corporation, a Japanese corporation, Epoch Company Ltd., a New Jersey corporation, Epoch Corporation, a New Jersey corporation, Toys R. US, Inc., a California corporation, Lionel Leisure, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation, Best Products, Inc., a Virginia corporation, and Lash-Tamaron Distributors, Inc., a New Jersey corporation, Defendants. COLECO INDUSTRIES, INC., a Connecticut corporation, Plaintiff, v. BANDAI-AMERICA, INC., a New Jersey corporation, Bandai Company, Ltd., a Japanese corporation, Bandai Overseas Corporation, a Japanese corporation, Epoch Company Ltd., a Japanese corporation, and Epoch Corporation, a New Jersey corporation, Defendants. |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of New Jersey |
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
Pitney, Hardin, Kipp & Szuch by Gregory C. Parliman, Morristown, N. J., and Loeb & Loeb by Robert A. Meyer, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff Midway Mfg. Co.
Kaye, Scholer, Fierman, Hays & Handler by Frederic W. Yerman, New York City, for plaintiff Coleco Industries, Inc.
Carella, Byrne, Bain & Gilfillan, New York City by R. Gale Rhodes, Jr., Newark, N. J., for defendants Bandai-America, Inc., Bandai Overseas Corp., Bandai Co., Ltd. and Toys R. US, Inc.
Technological advances and the incessant quest for new forms of leisure time amusement converge in the instant case to thrust this Court into the center of the current video game mania gripping the United States. Specifically, this case involves two of the most popular video games of all time, Pac-Man and Galaxian. Plaintiffs, Midway Manufacturing (Midway) and Coleco Industries (Coleco), manufacture and sell, respectively, the full-size arcade and two of the authorized handheld miniaturized versions of these games. They are suing Bandai Industries (Bandai), a New Jersey corporation importing two other handheld games named Galaxian and Packri Monster. These games are manufactured and exported from Japan respectively by defendants Bandai Company, Ltd. (BL) and Bandai Overseas Corp., (BO). Both of these Japanese corporations are related to Bandai.1
Plaintiffs allege that the Bandai handheld games violate the copyright and trademark laws of the United States, as well as the unfair competition laws of New Jersey and California. Midway in particular charges that the audiovisual displays of the Bandai games infringe its copyright in the audiovisual works of its own arcade games while the names of the Bandai games infringe Midway's trademarks in the names of its arcade machines. Coleco as a licensee of these copyrights and trademarks joins in Midway's allegations of infringements of same. Presently before the court are Midway's motions for summary judgment that:
In the alternative, Midway requests preliminary injunctive relief on these claims.2
Midway is a well-known American producer of video arcade games. Its Galaxian and Pac-Man games were created by Namco, Ltd. (Namco), a Japanese corporation. Both games were first published in Japan by Namco, Galaxian on September 17, 1979 and Pac-Man on May 22, 1980. Midway learned of both games at showings in Japan and determined that they had commercial potential in the United States. Namco and Midway accordingly entered into an agreement whereby Midway would receive all copyright and trademark rights in the two games in both the United States and the rest of the Western Hemisphere. Assignments of the copyright rights in Galaxian and Pac-Man were recorded with the Copyright Office on March 6, 1980 and November 13, 1980, respectively. On the strength of these assignments, Midway was issued copyright registrations in its name for both games as audiovisual works, effective the same dates as the assignments were filed.3
Midway began marketing Galaxian in the beginning of 1980 and Pac-Man in early 1981. It has promoted these games at considerable expense and they have proved to be two of the most successful video games ever. Although Midway ceased marketing its Galaxian in July 1981, it apparently continues to sell Pac-Man.4 Midway has actively licensed rights to its two games. As part of a consent judgment, Midway granted Entex Ltd. a limited license, since expired, to produce handheld Pac-Man and Galaxian games. A similar license as to a Galaxian-type game was granted Epoch, originally a defendant here but since dismissed. Tomy Corporation also has a license to produce its own handheld Pac-Man electronic game. This license expires on December 1, 1983 and was part of a quit claim assignment by Tomy to Midway of any rights it might have claimed in the mark Pac-Man as well as in Tomy's mechanical game of the same name. Midway also licensed back Namco, its original assignor of the copyright rights, the rights to the home video versions of the games. Namco has since sublicensed Atari to manufacture such units. Finally, Midway has licensed its co-plaintiff in this suit, Coleco, to produce handheld versions of both Galaxian and Pac-Man bearing those marks. This "semi-exclusive" license is of an indefinite duration and commenced on February 1, 1982. Coleco has been soliciting orders for its games at least since January 1982. Its Pac-Man game was available for retail sale then and its Galaxian game apparently was so available the following month; in any event, both are now being sold to the public. Coleco has expended large sums in advertising and marketing its handheld games.
Bandai's Packri Monster Game was designed for it by another Japanese company named Kaken. Work on the game apparently began in October 1980; it was first produced for distribution in April or May 1981. BL created its Galaxian game in Japan apparently during early 1980. BL sells these games to BO; BO sells them, in Japan, to Bandai which, in turn, actually imports them into the United States. Bandai has been selling Galaxian units in the United States since late 1980 and Packri Monster Games since July 1981.
Midway's Arcade games cost several thousand dollars and are sold primarily to arcades, bars, and similar establishments. Bandai's games sell for approximately $30-$50 and are retailed to the general public mainly through toy stores.
At the heart of a copyright infringement action are the works themselves. Since audiovisual works are at issue here, extensive visual and aural examinations have been undertaken. A description of the various games is thus in order.5
A. Midway's Pac-Man: The Seventh Circuit in the recent case of Atari v. North American Philips Consumer Electronics Corp., 672 F.2d 607 (7th Cir. 1982) had before it an infringement action involving the very same Midway Pac-Man game as is at issue here. The following description, which this court adopts, may be found at 672 F.2d 610-611:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Williams Electronics, Inc. v. Bally Mfg. Corp.
...611 F.2d 296, 300 n. 1 (9th Cir. 1979); Morrissey v. Proctor & Gamble Co., 379 F.2d 675 (1st Cir.1967); Midway Mfg. Co. v. Bandai-America, Inc., 546 F.Supp. 125, 148 (D.N.J.1982); Midway Mfg. Co. v. Arctic Int'l, Inc., 211 U.S.P.Q. 1152, 1157-58 (N.D.Ill.1981), aff'd, 704 F.2d 1009 (7th Cir......
-
Data General Corp. v. Grumman Systems Support Corp.
...have the discretion to limit its examination to the facial validity of the application and deposit. See Midway Mfg. Co. v. Bandai-America, Inc., 546 F.Supp. 125, 143-44 (D.N.J.1982) (citing, inter alia, Donald v. Uarco Business Forms, 478 F.2d 764, 765 n. 1 (8th Cir.1973)). Nevertheless, an......
-
Lotus Dev. Corp. v. Paperback Software Intern., Civ. A. No. 87-76-K.
...and pervasive" as to preclude, as a matter of law, any assertion of independent creation, see Midway Manufacturing Co. v. Bandai-America, Inc., 546 F.Supp. 125, 141 n. 11, 149 (D.N.J.1982) ("overwhelming and pervasive" copying can preclude, as a matter of law, finding of independent creatio......
-
M. Kramer Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Andrews
...this issue has reached the same conclusion. as "audiovisual works" under this reasoning that the court in Midway Mfg. Co. v. Bandai-America, Inc., 546 F.Supp. 125, 139 (D.N.J.1982), 14 said: "It is also unquestionable that video games in general are entitled to copyright protections as audi......
-
Intellectual Property Summer Bulletin 2011
...or imaginative generally have received greater protection against infringers. For example, in Midway Mfg. Co. v. Bandai-America, Inc., 546 F. Supp. 125 (D.N.J. 1982), Midway sought a preliminary injunction to stop Bandai from distributing an alleged knockoff of Midway's Galaxian, an outer s......
-
The Heart of the Matter: the Property Right Conferred by Copyright - Douglas Y'barbo
...the existing state of the art leaves off, the inventor's claims begin. 95. Id. at 742. 96. Midway Mfg. Co. v. Bandai-America, Inc., 546 F. Supp. 125, 143 (D.N.J. 1982) (citing H.R. REP. No. 94-1476, at 157, reprinted in 1976 U.S.C.C.A.N. 5659, 5773). 97. Cadence Indus. Corp. v. Ringer, 450 ......
-
Federal Copyright Law in the Computer Era: Protection for the Authors of Video Games
...672 F.2d 607, 615 (7th Cir. 1982); Stem Elecs., Inc. v. Kaufman, 669 F.2d 852, 857 (2d Cir. 1982); Midway Mfg. Co. v. Bandai-Am., Inc., 546 F. Supp. 125, 155 (D.N.J. 1982); Atari, Inc. v. Ken Williams, No. 81-410 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 28, 1981) (available prior to publication of this article on L......
-
Copying copyright's willful infringement standard: a comparison of enhanced damages in patent law and copyright law.
...411(a) (codifying necessity of preregistration to commence infringement action). (54.) See Midway Mfg. Co. v. Bandai-Am., Inc., 546 F. Supp. 125, 143-44 (D.N.J. 1982) (noting Copyright Office's failure to examine does not invalidate copyright (55.) See 17 U.S.C. [section] 408(a) (requiring ......
-
Ownership of Software and Computer-stored Data
...of plaintiff's is economically rewarded. See, Midway (Artic), supra, note 36 at 1015; Midway Mfg. Co. v. Bandai-America, Inc., 546 F.Supp. 125, 142 (D. N.J. 1982) at 155 [hereafter, Midway (Bandai)]. Approached another way, if the piracy and copying of others' works were freely permitted, f......