Migar Enterprises, Inc. v. DeMent, WD

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
Writing for the CourtKENNEDY
CitationMigar Enterprises, Inc. v. DeMent, 817 S.W.2d 911 (Mo. App. 1990)
Decision Date27 March 1990
Docket NumberNo. WD,WD
Parties5 IER Cases 337 MIGAR ENTERPRISES, INC., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Larry L. DeMENT, Defendant/Respondent. 42374.

William N. Marshall, III, Grandview, for plaintiff-appellant.

Douglas F. Noland, Kansas City, for defendant-respondent.

Before KENNEDY, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and TURNAGE, JJ.

KENNEDY, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff Migar Enterprises, Inc., appeals an adverse judgment in its suit for an injunction and damages against defendant Larry L. DeMent for the alleged breach by DeMent of an agreement not to compete.

Migar was the owner and proprietor of a land survey business named Land Survey Company, headquartered in Grandview, Missouri. On May 27, 1986, it purchased from Larry L. DeMent his land survey business located in Gladstone, Missouri, and entered upon the operation thereof under the name of Land Survey North. The purchase price was $25,000.

The contract between Migar and DeMent contained the following provision: "From and after the closing, the seller agrees not to directly or indirectly own, manage, operate, join, control or participate in the ownership, management, operation or control of, or be connected in any manner with, any survey business for a period of five years after the closing within 75 miles of the city limits of Kansas City, Missouri."

Beginning June 1, 1988, two years after the sale to Migar, Larry L. DeMent became an employee of D & D Survey, Inc., a corporation engaged in the land survey business in North Kansas City, Missouri. The sole shareholder of D & D Survey, Inc., is Neil DeMent, who is the son of Larry L. DeMent. Beginning in June, 1985, plaintiff suffered a sharp decline of its Land Survey North business, which it attributed to Larry L. DeMent's reentry into the land survey business.

Larry L. DeMent since his employment by D & D has personally supervised the land surveys undertaken by D & D and has signed and affixed his seal to survey documents and instruments. Section 327.401.2, RSMo 1986, makes such personal participation by a registered land surveyor mandatory, and the requirement is amplified by Mo.Code Regs. tit. 4, § 30-10.010(2) (1982) and Mo.Code Regs. tit. 4, § 30-13.010 (1982). Larry L. DeMent is a registered land surveyor and the only registered land surveyor in D & D's employ or otherwise connected with it. He in fact performs the registered land surveyor's duties in his employment by D & D.

The foregoing facts are not in dispute. The questions presented by this appeal are questions of law. On questions of law the trial court is entitled to no deference on appeal. City of Cabool v. Missouri State Board of Mediation, 689 S.W.2d 51, 54-5 (Mo. banc 1985); Taylor v. City of Pagedale, 746 S.W.2d 576, 577-78 (Mo.App.1987); Buchanan v. Graf, 671 S.W.2d 379, 381 (Mo.App.1984).

At the conclusion of the court tried non-jury case the trial court rendered judgment for the defendant without any findings of fact or conclusions of law. We affirm if the evidence supports the judgment upon any theory. Randel v. McClanahan, 760 S.W.2d 607, 608 (Mo.App.1988); Jensen v. Borton, 734 S.W.2d 580, 584 (Mo.App.1987); Telge v. Telge, 677 S.W.2d 403, 405 (Mo.App.1984).

We are unable, even with respondent's help, to find any theory upon which the judgment of the trial court may be affirmed.

That Larry L. DeMent breached the non-competition provisions of the contract is clear. To use the words of the contract, he directly participated in the operation of a survey business, D & D Survey, and was directly connected with such business during the time and within the area forbidden by his agreement. D & D Survey was headquartered within 75 miles of the city limits of Kansas City--in fact, in the municipality adjacent to such city limits. Larry L. DeMent's proscribed activity was commenced June 1,...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
1 cases
  • Baker v. Bristol Care, Inc.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • August 19, 2014
    ...concerning things such as pay and benefits that have an immediate and certain value to the employee.6 See also Migar Enterprises, Inc. v. DeMent, 817 S.W.2d 911, 913 (Mo.App.1990) (covenant not to compete in contract selling business was supported by consideration because, “[w]hile the cont......
4 books & journal articles
  • Section 60 Requirement of a Valid and Enforceable Contract
    • United States
    • The Missouri Bar Practice Books Employer-Employee Law Deskbook Chapter 6 Employees Not
    • Invalid date
    ...to the continuation of employment. The question of valid consideration was also raised in Migar Enterprises, Inc. v. DeMent, 817 S.W.2d 911 (Mo. App. W.D. 1990), a case involving the sale of a business. Migar purchased a land survey business from DeMent along with DeMent’s contractual promi......
  • Section 4.35 Specific Performance of Negative Covenants
    • United States
    • The Missouri Bar Practice Books Contracts Deskbook Chapter 4 Remedies
    • Invalid date
    ...business, one court has held that five years and 75 miles from the city’s limits are not unreasonable. Migar Enters., Inc. v. DeMent, 817 S.W.2d 911 (Mo. App. W.D. 1990). Before the court grants an injunction that will deprive an employee of a means of livelihood, it should be very certain ......
  • Section 62 Examples of Time and Area Restrictions Upheld by Courts
    • United States
    • The Missouri Bar Practice Books Employer-Employee Law Deskbook Chapter 6 Employees Not
    • Invalid date
    ...not to compete entered into in connection with the sale of businesses are generally longer in duration. Migar Enters., Inc. v. DeMent, 817 S.W.2d 911 (Mo. App. W.D. 1990) (seller of land survey business; five years; seventy-five-mile radius of city limits); Champion Sports Ctr., Inc. v. Pet......
  • Section 10 Examples of Time and Area Restrictions Upheld by Courts
    • United States
    • The Missouri Bar Employer-Employee Law (2008 Supp) Chapter 17 Restrictive Employment Covenants
    • Invalid date
    ...not to compete entered into in connection with the sale of businesses are generally longer in duration. Migar Enters., Inc. v. DeMent, 817 S.W.2d 911 (Mo. App. W.D. 1990) (seller of land survey business; 5 years; 75-mile radius of city limits); Champion Sports Ctr., Inc. v. Peters, 763 S.W.......