Milhouse v. Levi, No. 75-1844
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia) |
| Writing for the Court | Before BAZELON, Chief Judge, WILKEY; MERHIGE |
| Citation | 548 F.2d 357,179 U.S.App.D.C. 1 |
| Parties | Lester D. MILHOUSE et al., Appellant, v. Edward H. LEVI, United States Attorney General, et al. |
| Docket Number | No. 75-1844 |
| Decision Date | 13 December 1976 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
53 practice notes
-
Al Bahlul v. United States, No. 11–1324.
...1735, 118 L.Ed.2d 352 (1992) ); see United States v. Hernandez–Rodriguez, 352 F.3d 1325, 1328 (10th Cir.2003) ; cf. Milhouse v. Levi, 548 F.2d 357, 363 (D.C.Cir.1976) ; United States v. Gorski, 47 M.J. 370, 375 (C.A.A.F.1997). This principle applies in both criminal and civil cases. See Wil......
-
Ali Hamza Ahmad Suliman Al Bahlul v. United States, No. 11–1324.
...S.Ct. 1735, 118 L.Ed.2d 352 (1992)); see United States v. Hernandez–Rodriguez, 352 F.3d 1325, 1328 (10th Cir.2003); cf. Milhouse v. Levi, 548 F.2d 357, 363 (D.C.Cir.1976); United States v. Gorski, 47 M.J. 370, 375 (C.A.A.F.1997). This principle applies in both criminal and civil cases. See ......
-
U.S. v. Mills, Nos. 90-3007
...not vitiate the essential character of the District [and its Code] as an arm of the sovereign United States."). See also Milhouse v. Levi, 548 F.2d 357, 360 n. 6 (D.C.Cir.1976) ("[V]iolation of the criminal provisions of the District of Columbia Code are considered offenses against the laws......
-
Donovan v. Crisostomo, No. 81-4305
...court but not considered, especially when the issue involves legal and not factual considerations. 9 In Millhouse v. Levi, 179 D.C.App. 1, 548 F.2d 357, 362 (1976), the Court held it appropriate to consider whether the ex post facto clause 10 prohibited an order by the Attorney General desp......
Request a trial to view additional results
52 cases
-
United States v. Al Bahlul, No. CMCR 09–001.
...to waiver. Id. citing Curtis Pub. Co. v. Butts, 388 U.S. 130, 87 S.Ct. 1975, 18 L.Ed.2d 1094 (1967) (First Amendment); Milhouse v. Levi, 548 F.2d 357 (D.C.Cir.1976) ( Ex Post Facto ); United States v. Jones, 527 F.2d 817 (D.C.Cir.1975) (Due Process). Second, the record does not support a co......
-
U.S. v. Mills, Nos. 90-3007
...not vitiate the essential character of the District [and its Code] as an arm of the sovereign United States."). See also Milhouse v. Levi, 548 F.2d 357, 360 n. 6 (D.C.Cir.1976) ("[V]iolation of the criminal provisions of the District of Columbia Code are considered offenses against the laws......
-
Geraghty v. U.S. Parole Commission, Nos. 77-1679
...140 Id. at 1335. 141 Shepard v. Taylor, 556 F.2d at 654 (dictum). 142 Ruip v. United States, 555 F.2d at 1335. Cf. Milhouse v. Levi, 179 U.S.App.D.C. 1, 548 F.2d 357 (1976) (alteration of eligibility regulations for furlough program not Ex post facto law since furlough, unlike parole, was n......
-
ASSOCIATION OF CIVILIAN TECHNICIANS, INC. v. US, No. 09-5153.
...States' "policy and practice" of refusing to issue orders of individual reinstatement to a state National Guard. See Milhouse v. Levi, 548 F.2d 357, 363 (D.C.Cir.1976). As the Guardsmen acknowledge, for many years the Board has consistently issued recommendations rather than orders to the s......
Request a trial to view additional results