Miljkovic v. Shafritz and Dinkin, P.A.
| Docket Number | 14-13715 |
| Decision Date | 30 June 2015 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
238 cases
-
Tedder v. Inch
...can be drawn from such allegations. Burban v. City of Neptune Beach, 920 F.3d 1274, 1278 (11th Cir. 2019); Miljkovic v. Shafritz & Dinkin, P.A., 791 F.3d 1291, 1297 (11th Cir. 2015) (quotations and citations omitted). As such, the recited facts are drawn from the SAC and may differ from tho......
-
Feggins v. LVNV Funding Llcand Resurgent Capital Servicing L.P. (In re Feggins)
...standard should apply when the debt collection activity is directed to a consumer's attorney. SeeMiljkovic v. Shafritz & Dinkin, P.A.,791 F.3d 1291, 1306 n. 10, 1308 n. 12 (11th Cir.2015). However, as this Court noted in Feggins II,the Eleventh Circuit did not decide the issue in Miljkovic,......
-
Stratton v. Portfolio Recovery Assocs., LLC
...not persuasive because in that case, the defendant did not “erroneously state the amount of the debt owed by” the plaintiff. 791 F.3d 1291, 1306 (11th Cir.2015). [Record No. 54, p. 27] Further, to the extent that Miljkovic discussed § 1692f, it merely focused on that provision as a “catchal......
-
In re Disposable Contact Lens Antitrust
...plaintiff. See , e.g. , Davidson v. Capital One Bank (USA). N.A. , 797 F.3d 1309, 1312 (11th Cir. 2015) ; Miljkovic v. Shafritz & Dinkin, P.A. , 791 F.3d 1291, 1297 (11th Cir. 2015) ; Jacobs , 626 F.3d at 1333. Rule 8(a)(2) "requires only ‘a short and plain statement of the claim showing th......
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
Am I subject to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act?
...the broad view that "documents filed in court in the course of judicial proceedings to collect on a debt...are subject to the FDCPA." 791 F.3d 1291, 1295 (11th Cir. 2015). But even under this approach, SPS's motion to tax costs is not a "debt" because it is not a document filed in a proceed......
4 books & journal articles
-
9.1 Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
...168, 176-77 (3d Cir. 2015); Powers v. Credit Mgmt. Servs., 776 F.3d 567, 573-74 (8th Cir. 2015); Miljkovic v. Shafritz & Dinkin, P.A., 791 F.3d 1291, 1297-1300 (11th Cir. 2015); Stratton v. Portfolio Recovery Assocs., LLC, 770 F.3d 443, 449-50 (6th Cir. 2014); James v. Wadas, 724 F.3d 1312,......
-
9.1 Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
...168, 176-77 (3d Cir. 2015); Powers v. Credit Mgmt. Servs., 776 F.3d 567, 573-74 (8th Cir. 2015); Miljkovic v. Shafritz & Dinkin, P.A., 791 F.3d 1291, 1297-1300 (11th Cir. 2015); Stratton v. Portfolio Recovery Assocs., LLC, 770 F.3d 443, 449-50 (6th Cir. 2014), as amended Dec. 11, 2014; Jame......
-
Trial Practice and Procedure
...Id. (citing 15 U.S.C. § 1692a(2)).64. Id. at 1273 (quoting 15 U.S.C. § 1692e).65. Id. (relying on Miljkovic v. Shafritz & Dinkin, P.A., 791 F.3d 1291, 1301-03 (11th Cir. 2015)). 66. Id. at 1274 (quoting 15 U.S.C. § 1692g(a)).67. Id.68. Id.69. Id.70. Id. (quoting LeBlanc v. Unifund CCR Partn......
-
Gorsuch's Purgatory: Attempting to Define Debt Collector Under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
...legislation would also limit the CFPB's power to reach attorneys acting in this manner. Id.125. See Miljkovic v. Shafritz & Dinkin, P.A., 791 F.3d 1291, 1304 (11th Cir. 2015) ("Guided by Supreme Court precedent and the plain language of the FDCPA, we find that the Act applies to the litigat......