Miller Piano Co. v. Parker
Decision Date | 10 April 1893 |
Docket Number | 228 |
Citation | 26 A. 303,155 Pa. 208 |
Parties | Miller Piano Co. v. Parker, Appellant |
Court | Pennsylvania Supreme Court |
Argued March 23, 1893
Appeal, No. 228, Jan. T., 1893, by defendant, Gilbert F Parker, from judgment of C.P. No. 1, Phila. Co., Sept. T 1891, No. 845, on verdict for plaintiffs, the Henry F. Miller & Sons Piano Co.
Trespass for conversion of piano.
At the trial, before BREGY, J., it appeared that plaintiff leased a piano to Mary A. Davis for the term of three months at a rental of $20.00. Subsequently Mrs. Davis sold the piano to defendant.
Defendant's points were as follows:
Refused. [1]
Refused. [2]
Refused. [3]
Refused. [4]
Refused. [5]
Refused. [6]
Refused. [7]
8. Request for binding instructions. Refused. [8]
Binding instructions were given for plaintiff. [9]
Verdict and judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appealed.
Errors assigned were (1-9) instructions, quoting them.
The judgment is affirmed.
W. A. Manderson, for appellant, cited: Entriken v. Brown, 32 Pa. 364; Penna. R.R. Co.'s Ap., 86 Pa. 84.
Ormond Rambo, for appellee, not heard, cited: Lehigh Co. v. Field, 8 W. & S. 232; Enlow v. Klein, 79 Pa. 488; Chamberlain v. Smith, 44 Pa. 431; Rowe v. Sharp, 51 Pa. 26; Crist v. Kleber, 79 Pa. 290; Edwards v. Stranghellen, 105 Pa. 103; Dando v. Foulds, 105 Pa. 74; Wheeler & Wilson Mfg. Co. v. Heil, 115 Pa. 487; Ditman v. Cottrell, 125 Pa. 606; Wertz & Co. v. Collender Co., 20 W.N. 59.
Before WILLIAMS, McCOLLUM, MITCHELL, DEAN and THOMPSON, JJ.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Handley Motor Co. v. Wood
...208 Pa. 504, 57 A. 984; Quinn v. Davis, 78 Pa. 15; O'Connor v. Clark, 170 Pa. 318, 32 A. 1029, 29 L.R.A. 607; Miller Piano Co. v. Parker, 155 Pa. 208, 26 A. 303, 35 Am.St. Rep. 873; McMahon v. Sloan, 12 Pa. 229, 51 Am.Dec. 601; Werley v. Dunn, supra; 46 Am.Jur., Sales, section 464; 77 C.J.S......
-
City Bank of Buffalo v. Easton Boot & Shoe Co.
... ... Judgment affirmed ... Russell ... C. Stewart and George C. Miller, for appellant. -- The ... defendant was not a "subsequent purchaser in good ... faith:" Van ... Leonard, 24 Pa. 17; Gonser v. Smith, 115 Pa ... 456; Barnard v. Campbell, 55 N.Y. 456; Parker v ... Baxter, 86 N.Y. 586; Winne v. McDonald, 39 N.Y ... 240; Goodwin v. Wertheimer, 99 N.Y ... Pa. 358; Sensinger v. Boyer, 153 Pa. 628; ... Griffiths v. Sears, 112 Pa. 523; Miller Piano ... Co. v. Parker, 155 Pa. 208; Bank v. Wentzel, ... 151 Pa. 142; Clow v. Woods, 5 S. & R. 275; ... ...
-
Leitch v. Sanford Motor Truck Co.
...Ryman v. Gerlach, 153 Pa. 197; Bank of North America v. Motor Car Co., 235 Pa. 194; Estey Co. v. Dick, 41 Pa.Super. 610; Miller Piano Co. v. Parker, 155 Pa. 208; Commercial Security Co. v. Greer, 77 Pa.Super. 458; Quinn v. Davis, 78 Pa. 15. Before FRAZER, WALLING, SIMPSON, KEPHART, SADLER a......
-
Boozer v. Jones
... ... v. De Loach Manuf'g ... Co., 139 Ala. 645, 36 So. 765, 101 Am. St. Rep. 63; ... Miller Piano Co. v. Parker, 155 Pa. 208, 26 A. 303, ... 35 Am. St. Rep. 873, 874. McKinley was shown, ... ...