Miller v. BROWN SHIP-BUILDING CO., 12097.

Citation165 F.2d 956
Decision Date27 January 1948
Docket NumberNo. 12097.,12097.
PartiesMILLER et al. v. BROWN SHIP-BUILDING CO.
CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)

Chris Dixie, of Houston, Tex., for appellants.

J. A. Rauhut, of Austin, Tex., and C. E. Bryson, Brian S. Odem, U. S. Atty., and W. F. Lehigh, Asst. U. S. Atty., all of Houston, Tex., for appellee. Contra.

Before SIBLEY, WALLER, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Jurisdiction of a federal district court is not presumed, and the complaint must, as against a motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction, allege facts showing jurisdiction. The complaint here does not with sufficient clearness show what the controversy is and that the court has jurisdiction over it. The judgment of dismissal for this cause is affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines v. Amalgamated Ass'n
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    • June 10, 1952
    ...the defect be corrected by amendment." See also Gibbs v. Buck, 1939, 307 U.S. 66, 59 S.Ct. 725, 83 L.Ed. 1111; Miller v. Brown Shipbuilding Co., 5 Cir., 1948, 165 F. 2d 956; Gustafson v. Fred Wolferman, Inc., W.D.Mo.1945, 6 F.R.D. 503; Gates v. Graham Ice Cream Co., D.Neb.1940, 31 F.Supp. 8......
  • Underwood v. Maloney
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit
    • March 26, 1958
    ...1926, 270 U.S. 456, 46 S.Ct. 338, 70 L.Ed. 682; Gibbs v. Buck, 1939, 307 U.S. 66, 59 S.Ct. 725, 83 L.Ed. 1111; Miller v. Brown Shipbuilding Co., 5 Cir., 1948, 165 F.2d 956. Indeed, in the complaints in the cases at bar there are not even averments of the respective citizenships of all the m......
  • Cooper v. County Bd. of Review of Grant County
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • December 13, 1971
    ...pleaded, and in the absence of proper jurisdictional averments the complaint may be dismissed. (See Miller v. Brown Ship-Building Co., (1948) (C.A. 5) 165 F.2d 956.) Specific jurisdictional allegations are usually not necessary under our practice since most courts of this state possess gene......
  • BROWN BROTHERS EQUIPMENT CO. v. State of Michigan
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Michigan
    • April 7, 1967
    ...the complaint must, as against a motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction, allege facts showing jurisdiction. Miller v. Brown Shipbuilding Co., 5 Cir., 165 F.2d 956. Under Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C., a plaintiff suing in a United States district court, mu......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT