Miller v. California
| Decision Date | 04 December 1967 |
| Docket Number | No. 154,154 |
| Citation | 88 S.Ct. 460,389 U.S. 968,19 L.Ed.2d 459 |
| Parties | Lucille MILLER, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
F. Lee Bailey and Alan M. Dershowitz, for petitioner.
Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen. of California, William E. James, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Philip C. Griffin, Deputy Atty. Gen., for respondent.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, granted limited to questions 1 and 2 presented by the petition which read as follows:
'1. Whether the introduction of admissions made to an undercover agent planted in petitioner's jail cell constituted a violation of petitioner's constitutional rights to counsel and against self-incrimination.
...
To continue reading
Request your trial
19 cases
-
Norwalk Core v. Norwalk Redevelopment Agency
... ... Redevelopment Agency of the City of Oakland, California, 317 F.2d 872 (9 Cir.), cert. denied 375 U.S. 915, 84 S.Ct. 216, 11 L.Ed.2d 154 (1963), and Green Street Association v. Daley, 373 F.2d 1 (7 Cir.), ... ...
-
State v. Fish
...65 Cal.2d 543, 55 Cal.Rptr. 393, 421 P.2d 401, (1966) cert. den. 389 U.S. 850, 88 S.Ct. 43, 19 L.Ed.2d 119, reh. den. 389 U.S. 996, 88 S.Ct. 460, 19 L.Ed.2d 506 (1967); People v. Conterno, 170 Cal.App.2d Supp. 817, 339 P.2d 968 (1959); People v. Dawson, 184 Cal.App.2d Supp. 881, 7 Cal.Rptr.......
-
State v. Cormier
...for breathalyzer constitutionally admissible), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 850, 88 S.Ct. 43, 19 L.Ed.2d 119, reh'g denied, 389 U.S. 996, 88 S.Ct. 460, 19 L.Ed.2d 506 (1967). This is in fact the majority view. See South Dakota v. Neville, supra, 459 U.S. at 560-61, 103 S.Ct. at 921 and cases coll......
-
Jones v. Alfred Mayer Co, 645
...307 U.S. 496, 507—514, 527—532, 59 S.Ct. 954, 960—963, 969—971, 83 L.Ed. 1423. 2. 255 F.Supp. 115. 3. 379 F.2d 33. 4. 389 U.S. 968, 88 S.Ct. 479, 19 L.Ed.2d 459. 5. Because we have concluded that the discrimination alleged in the petitioners' complaint violated a federal statute that Congre......
Request a trial to view additional results