Miller v. Central Dispatch, Inc., No. 80-2135
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit) |
| Writing for the Court | Before BROWN and GOLDBERG; JOHN R. BROWN |
| Citation | 673 F.2d 773 |
| Parties | Ruth MILLER, Petitioner, v. CENTRAL DISPATCH, INC. and Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, Respondents. . Unit A * |
| Docket Number | No. 80-2135 |
| Decision Date | 22 April 1982 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
24 practice notes
-
Boudreaux v. American Workover, Inc., No. 80-3287
...933. The employer's insurer did, in fact, intervene herein to assert its claim for reimbursement. 4 See Miller v. Central Dispatch, Inc., 673 F.2d 773, 784 (5th Cir. 1982); Aparicio v. Swan Lake, 643 F.2d 1109 (5th Cir. 5 33 U.S.C. § 903(a) provides: Compensation shall be payable under this......
-
Coastal Production Services Inc. v. Hudson, No. 06-60766.
...involved in the loading of vessels — a traditional maritime activity — so we need not reach this issue. 7. Miller v. Cent. Dispatch, Inc., 673 F.2d 773, 778 (5th 8. Dir., OWCP v. Ingalls Shipbuilding, Inc., 125 F.3d 303, 305 (5th Cir. 1997). 9. B & D Contracting v. Pearley, 548 F.3d 338, 33......
-
Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. Rock, SEA-LAND
..."integral part" of unloading process), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 836, 102 S.Ct. 140, 70 L.Ed.2d 116 (1981); Miller v. Central Dispatch, Inc., 673 F.2d 773 (5th Cir.1982) (security guard/courier guarding detainees aboard ship and transported cargo between vessels and shore held covered); Kelly ......
-
McDermott, Inc. v. Boudreaux, No. 81-4309
...to its construction of the Longshoremen's Act in reviewing its determinations for errors of law. See Miller v. Central Dispatch, Inc., 673 F.2d 773 at 779 & n.12 (5th Cir. 6 A panel of this court recently examined a Jones Act claim using what it referred to as a "McKie/Robison analysis." Ar......
Request a trial to view additional results
24 cases
-
Boudreaux v. American Workover, Inc., No. 80-3287
...933. The employer's insurer did, in fact, intervene herein to assert its claim for reimbursement. 4 See Miller v. Central Dispatch, Inc., 673 F.2d 773, 784 (5th Cir. 1982); Aparicio v. Swan Lake, 643 F.2d 1109 (5th Cir. 5 33 U.S.C. § 903(a) provides: Compensation shall be payable under this......
-
Coastal Production Services Inc. v. Hudson, No. 06-60766.
...involved in the loading of vessels — a traditional maritime activity — so we need not reach this issue. 7. Miller v. Cent. Dispatch, Inc., 673 F.2d 773, 778 (5th 8. Dir., OWCP v. Ingalls Shipbuilding, Inc., 125 F.3d 303, 305 (5th Cir. 1997). 9. B & D Contracting v. Pearley, 548 F.3d 338, 33......
-
Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. Rock, SEA-LAND
..."integral part" of unloading process), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 836, 102 S.Ct. 140, 70 L.Ed.2d 116 (1981); Miller v. Central Dispatch, Inc., 673 F.2d 773 (5th Cir.1982) (security guard/courier guarding detainees aboard ship and transported cargo between vessels and shore held covered); Kelly ......
-
McDermott, Inc. v. Boudreaux, No. 81-4309
...to its construction of the Longshoremen's Act in reviewing its determinations for errors of law. See Miller v. Central Dispatch, Inc., 673 F.2d 773 at 779 & n.12 (5th Cir. 6 A panel of this court recently examined a Jones Act claim using what it referred to as a "McKie/Robison analysis." Ar......
Request a trial to view additional results