Miller v. Consolidated Traction Company

Decision Date06 January 1902
Docket Number83,82
Citation201 Pa. 175,50 A. 1119
PartiesMiller v. Consolidated Traction Company, Appellant
CourtPennsylvania Supreme Court

Argued October 31, 1901

Appeals, Nos. 82 and 83, by defendant, from judgment of C.P No. 1, Allegheny Co., Dec. T., 1900, No. 500, in case of Joseph L. Miller and Susan L. Miller, his Wife, v Consolidated Traction Company. Affirmed.

Trespass for personal injuries. Before COLLIER, J.

At the trial it appeared that Susan L. Miller, plaintiff, was run over by one of defendant's cars on December 8, 1898 while attempting to cross from the north side to the south side of Frankstown avenue at Station street in Pittsburg. The evidence as to the speed of the car and whether a signal was given was conflicting. It was not disputed that the distance from the north track to the curb of Frankstown avenue was seven feet and six inches. A large covered wagon was standing in such a position between the north track and the curb as to obstruct the view of the north track in the direction from which the car came which struck plaintiff. Mrs. Miller described the accident as follows:

"I started to cross the street. I stepped down off the curb and as I stepped off the curb I saw a car coming towards Wilkinsburg. I stopped until it left off its passengers and went on. Then I went to start to go across the street, and I looked towards town, and then I looked towards Wilkinsburg, but I couldn't see for a wagon, so I listened and I thought there was nothing coming, and I started for to cross the street, and when I got within a step or so of the track, why, the car came and I had no chance to turn or nothing, and I just threw up my hands."

"Q. Now, when you stepped down from the curbstone, or rather down from the curb, how far from the curb did you first go before you stopped? A. Only a step. Q. That would leave several feet between where you stood and the track? A. Yes, sir. Q. Now, were you standing there when the car to Wilkinsburg passed you? A. Yes, sir. Q. And after that started, you say you then moved forward? A. Yes, sir. Q. And did you stop again? A. No, sir. As I went to cross, as I went on, I seen the car coming right there, and I hadn't a chance to run or anything else. I throwed my hands up that way (indicating). Q. How far was that car from you when you first saw it? A. I couldn't say that. Q. Was it right on you? A. It was right on me, yes. It was that near to me that I hadn't a chance to get out of its way. Q. As you walked forward, did you look towards Wilkinsburg in your effort to see a car? A. Yes, sir; I did. Q. And you say you couldn't see one? A. No, sir; I couldn't see one. Q. Did you listen? A. I did listen. Q. Did you hear the car approaching? A. No, I didn't hear no car. I don't think I would have attempted to cross if I had heard a car."

Kerr, a witness for plaintiff, testified, as follows:

"Q. The Wilkinsburg car was standing on the other side of the street? A. On the far track. Q. And when it started, she then stepped closer to the track? A. She took a step or two and again stopped. Q. And she was standing here, facing Wilkinsburg, when the car came along? A. No; she had just took this step or two and stopped and looked and turned her head towards Wilkinsburg to see -- from the way she acted, I suppose she couldn't see, and just took another step as the car came on. Q. So far as your idea goes, she never got on to the track, and did not get in front of the car? A. She didn't step right on the track, no. Q. Then, when she went under the car, you say she went under the motor car? A. Yes, sir. Q. And it was the back wheels of the motor car? A. They passed over her. Q. The front wheels did not? A. The front wheels of the motor car did not. Q. This was an ordinary closed car? A. Yes, sir. Q. And according to the best of your recollection, was it as far back as the middle of the car that she put her hands up, and went under the car? A. It was about the middle of the motor car."

Sullivan, plaintiff's witness, said:

"Q. The car hit her? A. Yes, sir; kind of pushed her and turned her around, and the back step of the front car caught her and throwed her under the trailer."

Engineering evidence for the defendant tended to show that at the point where the accident occurred a person could stand within two feet of the rail, with the wagon ten feet away close to the rail as it could be placed, and see 950 feet of the track.

The court submitted the case to the jury.

Verdicts for $12,000 and $5,000 in favor of Joseph L. Miller and Susan L. Miller respectively. Joseph L. Miller remitted $2,000 and judgments were entered for $10,000 and $5,000, respectively. Defendant appealed.

Error assigned was in refusing binding instructions for defendant.

The judges who heard this case being equally divided in opinion, the judgment is affirmed.

J. H Beal, with him Knox & Reed, for appellant. -- Where a party walks against a moving car or locomotive, or gets so close to the track as to be struck by the side of the car or locomotive, he is guilty of contributory negligence: Hauser v. Central Railroad Co., 147 Pa. 440; Walsh v. Hestonville, etc., Pass. Railway Co., 194 Pa. 570; ...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT