Miller v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.
Decision Date | 22 November 1899 |
Citation | 97 F. 836 |
Parties | MILLER v. FIDELITY & CASUALTY CO. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York |
E Spencer Miller, for plaintiff.
S Sidney Carrere, for defendant.
The policy in question runs that the defendant--
'Does hereby insure Hobart Miller, residing in Coeburn, county of Wise, and state of Virginia, by occupation lawyer, classified by the company as A special, for the term of 12 months,' 'in the amount of five thousand dollars, principal sum,' 'against bodily injuries sustained through external, violent, and accidental means, as follows: If death shall result within ninety days from such injuries independently of all other causes, the company will pay the principal sum of this policy to the legal representatives of the assured. ' 'This insurance does not cover disappearances; nor war risk; nor voluntary exposure to unnecessary danger; nor injuries, fatal or otherwise resulting from poison or anything accidentally or otherwise taken, administered, absorbed, or inhaled, nor injuries fatal or otherwise received while or in consequence of having been under the influence of, or affected by, nor resulting directly or indirectly from, intoxicants, anaesthetics, narcotics, sunstroke, freezing, vertigo, sleepwalking, fits, hernia, or any disease or bodily infirmity.'
The complaint alleges that the policy was in full force and effect on the 1st day of July, 1898, and:
The hard, pointed, and resistant substances of food appear from the allegations to have been external, violent, and accidental means, for they originated outside of the body and were accidentally violent, although the accidental effect took place within. The insurance is not, by the first clause quoted,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of United States v. Gratiot, 1742
... ... 102 N.W. 190; Cretney v. Woodmen Acc. Co., (Wis.) ... 219 N.W. 448; Michener v. Fidelity etc. Co., (Ia.) ... 203 N.W. 14; Johnson v. Aetna Life Ins. Co., (Ga.) ... 101 S.E. 134; ... notwithstanding the verdict. U. S. Casualty Co. v ... Thrush, (Ohio) 152 N.E. 796; Corsones v. Monarch ... Ins. Co., 154 A. 693; ... Similar, ... in effect, are the following cases: Miller v. Fidelity & ... Casualty Co., (C. C.) 97 F. 836; Mutual Life Ins ... Co. v. Dodge, (C. C ... ...
-
Caldwell v. Travelers Ins. Company
...Mut. Acc. Co., 231 N.Y. 148; Lewis v. Ocean Acc. & G. Co., 244 N.Y. 18; Int. St. Bus. Men's Assn. v. Lewis, 257 F. 251; Miller v. Fidelity & Cas. Co., 97 F. 836; v. State Life, 184 N.W. 84; Interstate Business Men's Assn. v. Lester, 257 F. 225, certiorari denied in 250 U.S. 662; State Life ......
-
Brannaker v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America
...of Am., 167 Mich. 524, 133 N.W. 486; Nax v. Travelers Ins. Co., 130 F. 985; Horton v. Trav., 45 Cal.App. 462, 187 Pa. 1070; Miller v. Fidelity & Cas. Co., 97 F. 836; Hornby State Life Ins. Co., 106 Neb. 5757, 184 N.W. 84. Fordyce, White, Mayne, Williams & Hartman, William H. McBratney, Mich......
-
Caldwell v. Travelers' Ins. Co.
...therefore that the injury was inflicted by accidental means. The case lends no support to plaintiff's contention. Miller v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. (C. C.) 97 F. 836 (1899): While in a weakened condition the insured ate food containing hard, pointed, and resistant substances, and internal i......