Miller v. Gillette, 316
| Decision Date | 15 June 1959 |
| Docket Number | No. 316,Docket 25469.,316 |
| Citation | 267 F.2d 783 |
| Parties | Minniola O. MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Russell L. GILLETTE, Rose M. Gillette et al., Defendants-Appellees. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit |
Minniola O. Miller, pro se.
Howard J. Maxwell, of Steele, Collins & Maxwell, Hartford, Conn., for defendants-appellees.
Bernard E. Francis, West Hartford, Conn., for defendants-appellees Russell L. Gillette and Rose M. Gillette.
Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and LUMBARD and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges.
In Miller v. Town of Suffield, 2 Cir., 249 F.2d 16, we affirmed Judge Smith's dismissal of plaintiff's antitrust action which we characterized as an attempt to revive certain "fantastic claims of fraud and conspiracy" rejected in earlier litigation. The Supreme Court denied certiorari, 356 U.S. 978, 78 S.Ct. 1143, 2 L.Ed. 2d 1151, and then a motion for rehearing, 358 U.S. 859, 79 S.Ct. 16, 3 L.Ed.2d 93. After our affirmance Judge Smith, on motion of certain defendants, dissolved an attachment pendente lite upon their property and plaintiff has appealed. She has failed, however, to show any reason why the order was not only within the power of the district court, but also required upon the termination of her action. Affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
New England Merchants National Bank v Iran Power
...Thus, it is legally and factually impossible to obtain a pre-commencement order of attachment in federal court. Cf. Miller v. GilletteUNK, 267 F.2d 783 (2d Cir. 1959) (per curiam), cert. denied, 362 U.S. 922, 80 S.Ct. 676, 4 L.Ed.2d 742 (1960); Lloyd v. Lawrence, 60 F.R.D. 116, 120 (S.D.Tex......
-
FOREIGN EXCHANGE TRADE v. ONCETUR, SA
...Cir.1948). Indeed, Rule 64 allows attachment only "at the commencement of and during the course of an action ...." See Miller v. Gillette, 267 F.2d 783 (2d Cir.1959), cert. denied, 362 U.S. 922, 80 S.Ct. 676, 4 L.Ed.2d 472 (1960); Lloyd v. Lawrence, 60 F.R.D. 116, 120 (S.D.Tex. 1973); 7 Moo......
-
New England Merchants Nat. Bank v. Iran Power, 79 Civ. 6380 (KTD).
...it is legally and factually impossible to obtain a pre-commencement order of attachment in federal court. Cf. Miller v. Gillette, 267 F.2d 783 (2d Cir. 1959) (per curiam), cert. denied, 362 U.S. 922, 80 S.Ct. 676, 4 L.Ed.2d 742 (1960); Lloyd v. Lawrence, 60 F.R.D. 116, 120 (S.D.Tex.1973). S......
-
Pegram v. United States, 13767.
... ... Before MARTIN, Chief Judge, and ALLEN and MILLER, Circuit Judges ... PER CURIAM ... The principal question raised ... ...