Miller v. Melde
| Decision Date | 05 March 1987 |
| Docket Number | No. 13-86-427-CV,13-86-427-CV |
| Citation | Miller v. Melde, 730 S.W.2d 12 (Tex. App. 1987) |
| Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
| Parties | K.R. MILLER, et al., Appellants, v. Curtis Odell MELDE & Cities Service Oil and Gas Corporation, Appellees. |
W.T. McNeil, Vance & McNeil, Edna, for appellants.
Henry A. Welfel, Jr., Woody, Gum, Heintz & Villafranca, P.C., Victoria, for appellees.
Before UTTER, SEERDEN and DORSEY, JJ.
Appellee, Melde, brought a declaratory judgment action seeking a declaration that he owns 1/2 of the minerals and a 3/4 royalty interest pursuant to a deed conveying 15.734 acres of land to him. The trial court agreed with Melde and declared that he owns 1/2 of the minerals and a 3/4 royalty interest and that the Millers owned no interest in the mineral estate. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. 1
By their sole point of error, the Millers claim that the trial court erred in rendering judgment for Melde.
In 1969, Allen conveyed the land to K.R. Miller in fee simple, making no reservations or exceptions. According to the record before us, there had been no prior reservations or exceptions of any mineral interest. Miller conveyed the same land to the Bergstroms in 1975. However, the deed contained the following clause:
However, there is reserved and excepted in prior conveyances one-half ( 1/2) of the oil, gas and other minerals in or under said premises for a term of fifteen (15) years from the date of said reservation.
The Bergstroms conveyed the land to Melde, with the following clauses contained in the deed:
This conveyance is made and accepted SUBJECT TO the following:
(1) There is reserved and excepted in prior conveyances one-half ( 1/2) of the oil, gas and other minerals in or under said premises for a term of fifteen (15) years from the date of said reservation.
(2) The said Grantors herein reserve unto themselves, their heirs and assigns, an undivided one-fourth ( 1/4) interest in royalty in the oil, gas and other minerals in and under the above described land.
* * *
* * *
It is the intent and purpose of the foregoing reservation to reserve an undivided one-half of the oil, gas and other minerals, and in addition thereto an undivided one-fourth interest in royalty, for the term above provided, and to convey unto Grantee, his heirs, successors and assigns, an undivided one-half interest in the oil, gas and other minerals in and under the above described land, and an undivided one-fourth interest in royalty in the oil, gas and other minerals in and under said land.
The Millers argue that the clause in the Miller to Bergstrom deed operated to reserve a one-half interest in the oil, gas, and other minerals unto the grantors, the Millers. They cite Pich v. Lankford, 302 S.W.2d 645 (Tex.1957), as authority for their position. We find Pich distinguishable.
In Pich, as in the case at bar, there were two deeds containing similar clauses. The Howard to Sharp deed included the following clause: "Save and Except an undivided three-fourths of the oil, gas and other minerals in, on and under said land, which have been heretofore reserved." Id. at 646. The Sharp to Lankford deed contained the following language: "Save and Except an undivided three-fourths of the oil, gas and other minerals in and under the Southwest Quarter thereof, and an undivided one-fourth of the minerals in and under the remainder of said survey, which minerals do not belong to the grantors herein." Id.
The Court held...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Farm & Ranch Investors, Ltd. v. Titan Operating, L.L.C.
...subject to the previously recorded restrictions, but those restrictions were insufficient to reserve the mineral interests. See Miller v. Melde, 730 S.W.2d 12, 13 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 1987, no writ) (holding that a deed noting that prior conveyances reserved and excepted interests in th......
-
Roberson v. El Paso Exploration & Prod. Co.
...support the Nix Estates' proposition.7 On the other hand, El Paso and Craig rely on the cases of Ladd v. DuBose, Sharp v. Fowler, and Miller v. Melde. In Sharp v. Fowler, a deed from Cockrell, who had title to the surface of fifty acres of land and an undivided one-quarter interest in the m......
-
Thomason v. Badgett
...royalty, timber, or other interests] are available to be conveyed" because that language was not an explicit reservation); Miller v. Melde, 730 S.W.2d 12, 13 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1987, no writ) (holding that deed that only excepted interests in minerals as "reserved and excepted in pri......
-
CHAPTER 11 ASSIGNMENTS AND CONVEYANCES
...prior deed was both an exception from the warranty and a reservation of in favor of grantor in any such mineral rights); Miller v. Melde, 730 S.W.2d 12 (Tex. App.--Corpus Christi 1987) (conveyance, erroneous described as being subject to a reservation of minerals in a prior deed, was effect......