Miller v. Miller
| Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
| Writing for the Court | Dunklin |
| Citation | Miller v. Miller, 283 S.W. 1085 (Tex. App. 1926) |
| Decision Date | 06 February 1926 |
| Docket Number | (No. 11377.) |
| Parties | MILLER et al. v. MILLER et al. |
Appeal from District Court, Johnson County; Irwin T. Ward, Judge.
Suit by Frederick James Miller and others against William Gordon Miller and others, in which defendants filed a cross-action. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs appeal. Reversed and rendered.
Capps, Cantey, Hanger & Short, of Fort Worth, for appellants.
Walker & Baker, of Cleburne, and S. C. Padelford, of Fort Worth, for appellees.
The following statement taken from appellants' brief is a correct statement of the facts developed upon the trial of this case:
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
4 cases
-
Curtis v. Aycock
...he is bound thereby. 21 C.J. p. 1067, § 26; 31 C.J.S., Estoppel, § 10; 14 Am.Jur. p. 521, § 51; 19 Am.Jur. p. 619, § 91; Miller v. Miller, Tex.Civ.App., 283 S.W. 1085, error dismissed; Wilson v. Beck, Tex.Civ. App., 286 S.W. 315, error refused; Hanks v. Magnolia Petroleum Co., Tex.Civ.App.,......
-
Hammett v. Farrar
...sale and conveyance, but in a proper case an executory contract of sale by one competent to contract will be enforced. Miller v. Miller (Tex. Civ. App.) 283 S. W. 1085; Hale v. Hollon, supra; Beckley v. Newland, 2 P. Wms. 182, cited with approval in Hale v. But it is also well settled in th......
-
Frint v. Tate
...with the contention that no such trust can be created without the conscious intention of the grantor in the deed. Miller et al. v. Miller et al., Tex.Civ.App., 283 S.W. 1085. In the cited case the heirs of Mrs. Miller, before her death and without her knowledge, entered into a contract wher......
-
Grimes v. Collie
...allotted is entitled to contribution from the other parties to the partition for the resultant loss. Miller v. Miller, 283 S.W. 1085, 1091 (Tex.Civ.App.--Fort Worth 1926, writ dism'd). If there be error as asserted in Points of Error Nos. One and Two, Appellants have participated in invitin......